74:38
Sex 星／主役にする 競争
追加するd: 2014-05-29 I’m going to do something that some may みなす 不公平な, but I hope it will 最終的に 証明する a point about 発射-on-ビデオ features. I watched Sex 星／主役にする 競争 支援する-to-支援する with another L.A. ビデオ feature, 激しく揺する Hard. Sex 星／主役にする 競争 代表するs what is wrong with direct-to-ビデオ features; 激しく揺する Hard 代表するs a lot of what is 権利. For example, Sex 星／主役にする 競争 苦しむs from shoddy lighting, with very bad 影をつくる／尾行するs during the outdoor scene at the beginning and a 薄暗い 見解（をとる） of most of the sex scenes. 激しく揺する Hard is crisp and （疑いを）晴らす,with excellent lighting and ビデオ 質. With the exception of a hot scene with Peter North and blonde nymph Bunny Bleu (who’s the only 推論する／理由 to even look at this tape), the sex in Sex 星／主役にする 競争 苦しむs miserably, with a typical orgy scene, a segment 発射 in a plain bed against a plain white 塀で囲む and two scenes with 刑事 (16”) Rambone that 偉業／利用するs the man’s oversized thing in a cruel way. I mean, it’s 逆転する sexism here, with Rambone 存在 referred to as an “it” rather than a person. In 新規加入, the 極小の story, something (and I mean, who knows what?) to do with the casting of a film (they throw around phrases like “model 解放（する）”), is ever so わずかに developed by phone calls.How cheap can a 生産者 be? But the 対話 is very poor and the 肩書を与える has nothing to do with what we see on 審査する (I guess the word “競争” （一定の）期間s success; who knows?) I have no 疑問 that ビデオ 消費者s and 蓄える／店 owners would choose something like Sex 星／主役にする 競争 over 激しく揺する Hard (or 副／悪徳行為 versa) because of a nice box cover. But it takes a careful 買い手 to realize the difference between something like Sex 星／主役にする 競争 and its unattractive 女性（の） cast (except for Bunny Bleu) and a 質, higher-予算d story like 激しく揺する Hard. Will somebody please start putting the 生産／産物 予算 on the 一括ing?
83:46
Nikki Never Says No
86:44
Adolescentes Vicieuses
68:35
Sex Flex
86:19
黒人／ボイコット Velvet 3
74:46
