Maybe the Tories are doomed, but at least under a reinvigorated Rishi they won't go É餫¤¹¡¿·âÄƤ¹¤ë without a fight, Îá¾õs LEO McKINSTRY

After the ·à¤Î passage of his ´ú´Ï Rwanda Ë¡°Æ through µÄ²ñ Áá´ü¤Ë yesterday morning, Rishi Sunak was in È¿¹³Åª¤Ê mood. 'Nothing is going to stand in our way,' he Àë¸À¤¹¤ëd.

Just a few months ago, such a À¼ÌÀ might have smacked of hubris, but the ÁíÍýÂç¿Ã took a ÊúÍʤ¹¤ë ´í¸± in ²Ð·º¡¿ÅÒ¤±¤ëing his Åö¶É on this ¼êÃÊ, and the ÅÒ»ö appears ¡½ ¸¢Íø now, at least ¡½ to have worked.

The moment the Ë¡°Æ was finally passed was not only a ·èÄêŪ¤Ê victory for the À¯ÉÜ, but also his own very personal ¾¡Íø.

The Prime Minister took a huge risk in staking his authority on Rwanda policy, and the gamble appears ? right now, at least ? to have worked

The ÁíÍýÂç¿Ã took a ÊúÍʤ¹¤ë ´í¸± in ²Ð·º¡¿ÅÒ¤±¤ëing his Åö¶É on Rwanda À¯ºö, and the ÅÒ»ö appears ¡½ ¸¢Íø now, at least ¡½ to have worked

Some members of his ³Õν thought he was ´í¸±¤Ë misguided in ¾ÇÅÀ¡Ê¤ò¹ç¤ï¤»¤ë¡Ëing so much energy and political »ñËÜ¡¿¼óÅÔ on his Rwanda ·×²è¡Ê¤¹¤ë¡Ë, which ÌÜŪ¡Ê¤È¤¹¤ë¡Ës to Á˻ߤ¹¤ë crossings of the English Channel by ³Î¼Â¤Ë¤¹¤ëing °ãË¡¤Ê migrants are sent to the central African ¶¦Ï¹ñ.

'He is a really bad À¯¼£²È¡¤À¯¼£²°,' said one Âç¿Ã just before Christmas, arguing that Sunak had chosen the wrong battleground.

¶¼¤·

But unlike his critics, the ÁíÍýÂç¿Ã recognised that ²á·ã¤Ê ³èÆ°¡¿ÀïÆ® is needed to ¤Î¶á¤¯¤Ë É餫¤¹¡¿·âÄƤ¹¤ë the illicit cross-Channel Ëǰסʤ¹¤ë¡Ë run by the people-trafficking ¥®¥ã¥ó¥°¡ÊÃÄ¡Ës.

Not only have the numbers become unsustainable, but the Â羡¤¹¤ë Âåɽ¤¹¤ës a mortal ¶¼¤· to the safety of ¹¶·â¤ò¼õ¤±¤ä¤¹¤¤ people desperate to make it to our shores, a ´í¸± that was thrown into sharp µßºÑ only yesterday by the death of five migrants ¡½ ´Þ¤àing a little girl ¡½ who'd »î¤ß¤ë¡¿´ë¤Æ¤ëd the crossing.

It cannot be ÈÝÄꤹ¤ëd that many ¾ã³²Êªs ±³¡Ê¤ò¤Ä¤¯¡Ë ahead. Left-wing lawyers Âåɽ¤¹¤ëing migrants who Áܤ·½Ð¤¹ to Èò¤±¤ë ¹ñ³°ÄÉÊü will Å°ÄìŪ¤ËÁܤ¹ the small print of the ˡΧÀ©Äê in search of any ¡ÊË¡¤Ê¤É¤Î¡ËÈ´¤±·ê that might serve their ¸¶°ø¡Ê¤È¤Ê¤ë¡Ë. Âй³¼Ôs of a ¸·½Å¼èÄù, who love to É۹𤹤ë their ¶²¤é¤¯ ¿ÍƻŪ¤Ê values, will Áܤ·½Ð¤¹ to ¾¡Íø¡¤¾¡¤Ä in the Ë¡ÄºÛȽ½ê of public opinion.

The PM, pictured talking to reporters en route to Poland yesterday, recognised that radical action is needed to close down the illicit cross-Channel trade run by people-trafficking gangs

The PM, pictured talking to reporters en Â羡¤¹¤ë to Poland yesterday, recognised that ²á·ã¤Ê ³èÆ°¡¿ÀïÆ® is needed to ¤Î¶á¤¯¤Ë É餫¤¹¡¿·âÄƤ¹¤ë the illicit cross-Channel Ëǰסʤ¹¤ë¡Ë run by people-trafficking ¥®¥ã¥ó¥°¡ÊÃÄ¡Ës

But Åêɼ¼Ôs are heartily fed up with the toleration of a ¤æ¤¹¤ê that µö¤¹s migrants ¡½ most of them fit, young men ¡½ to jump the Îó to enter Britain.

Through his ·è°Õ to stick to his ·×²è¡Ê¤¹¤ë¡Ë, the ÁíÍýÂç¿Ã has also exposed the emptiness of ϫƯ's ÂÐΩ. Beyond trumpeting their moral Í¥±Û, ϫƯ has nothing to ¿½¤·¹þ¤à¡¿¿½¤·½Ð. The ÂÐΩ ²ñÃÌ about 'Ê´ºÕ¤¹¤ëing the ¥®¥ã¥ó¥°¡ÊÃÄ¡Ës' ¡½ as if that had never been tried ¡½ and about '°ÂÁ´¤Ê Â羡¤¹¤ës', but this is meaningless code for open ¹ñ¶­s.

The reality is that against all Ⱦüʪs, the ÁíÍýÂç¿Ã has driven through an ΨÀè that could have a real ¾×·â.

And if the ·×²è¡Ê¤¹¤ë¡Ës do start to take off for Rwanda with ÆÀÅÀ¤¹¤ë¡¿ÈóÆñ¤¹¤ë¡¿£²£°s of ÈïÄÉÊü¼Ôs on board, the narrative will be transformed. The Tories could begin to eat into ϫƯ's 20-point lead in the Åêɼs.

Yet even before any ¹Ò¶õµ¡ take to the skies, Sunak's own i mage has been ¹â¤á¤ëd by his resolute °·¤¦ing of this ÌäÂ꡿ȯ¹Ô¤¹¤ë. For months he has been written off as a dithering µ»½Ñ²È½Ð¿È¤Î´ÉÍý¿¦¼Ô, too immersed in the ¾ÜºÙ¡Ê¤Ë½Ò¤Ù¤ë¡Ë of À¯ºö to make ·èÄêŪ¤Ê ²ðÆþs.

But now an Âå°Æ¡¿ÁªÂò»è picture is ¸½¤ì¤ëing: that of a leader of uncompromising perseverance whose work ethic is matched by an inner steel. And ¤Ë¤â¤«¤«¤ï¤é¤º the admittedly dismal prospects of the Tories, Sunak seems to have grown in stature.

Yesterday, as part of his new, tougher approach, he ȯɽ¤¹¤ëd that defence spending will Áý²Ã¤¹¤ë to 2.5 per cent of GDP by 2030 ¡½ an uplift of at least ¡ò75 billion on the ¸½ºß¤Î ͽ»» and a victory for this paper in its powerful ¡ÊÁªµó¤Ê¤É¤Î¡Ë±¿Æ°¤ò¤¹¤ë against the neglect of the ÉðÁõ¤·¤¿ ·³Ââs.

This ¹ð¼¨ followed his ÀÀÌó¡Ê¤¹¤ë¡Ë last week to ¼è¤êÁȤà the 'sick-¸ø¼°Ê¸½ñ¡¤Ç§¤á¤ë culture' which is ÅÚÂæ¤òÊø¤¹ing our economy by ¶¡µë¤¹¤ëing perverse incentives to the ¼º¶È¤·¤¿ and fostering a spirit of Ê¡Íø»ö¶È dependency.

In the same vein, his À¯ÉÜ has been strong in its defence of ¥¤¥¹¥é¥¨¥ë and ¥¦¥¯¥é¥¤¥Ê¶¦Ï¹ñ, and he and ¡Ê¥É¥¤¥Ä¤Ê¤É¤Î¡Ë¼óÁê¡¿¡ÊÂç³Ø¤Î¡Ë³ØĹ Jeremy ÄÉÀסʤ¹¤ë¡Ë have brought »Ù±ç¤¹¤ë °ÂÄê to the economy after Liz Truss's Èá»´¤Ê ¡Ê°ìÄê¤Î¡Ë´ü´Ö in ¹ðȯ¡Ê¤¹¤ë¡Ë¡¤¹ðÁʡʤ¹¤ë¡Ë¡¿ÎÁ¶â.

In contrast to her recklessness, which ¶¼¤¹d a ºâÀ¯¾å¤Î ϧ¿´ÍÏÍ», Sunak's ·ÐºÑŪ¤Ê stewardship is built on Tory ¸¶Â§s of sound money, the ¾º¿Ê¡¿ÀëÅÁ of ´ë¶È and living within one's means.

It was always a myth ¡½ cultivated by his enemies in the party ¡½ that he is not a 'true ÊݼéŪ¤Ê'.

In fact, he is a stronger ¿®Êô¼Ô in ²ñ·×¤Î ÍÞÀ© than either Truss or her Á°Ç¤¼Ô Boris Johnson, who once compared his fondness for big-ÌÀ¸À¤¹¤ë¡¿¸øɽ¤¹¤ë ÁÈ¿¥¡¿´ðÈס¿²¼Éô¹½Â¤ »ö¶È¡¿·×²è¡Ê¤¹¤ë¡Ës with that of the arch interventionist Michael Heseltine. 'I'm a Brexity Hezza,' he Àë¸À¤¹¤ëd.

It took a man of Sunak's guts to bring the HS2 gravy train to a Ää»ß¡Ê¤µ¤»¤ë¡Ë ¡ ½ and put the ¥Ö¥ì¡¼¥­s on the mad dash to ÂáÊ᤹¤ë ̵.

In fact, much of the ¸º¤é¤¹ing of the PM's ɾȽ is built on a caricature. His detractors ¼çÄ¥¤¹¤ë that he leads a 'zombie' À¯ÉÜ without a sense of ÌÜŪ but, in truth, his µ­Ï¿¡¤µ­Ï¿Åª¤Ê¡¿µ­Ï¿¤¹¤ë in office is more impressive than is usually ǧ¤á¤ë.

It could be argued that he has done more than any other À¯¼£²È¡¤À¯¼£²° in the past 20 years to save the union between England and Scotland.

For it was his ·èÄ꡿ȽÄ꾡¤Á¡Ê¤¹¤ë¡Ë to Éõº¿¤¹¤ë the Scottish ¹ñ²È¼çµÁ¼Ôs' Gender ¾µÇ§ Ë¡°Æ which had been passed by the Scottish µÄ²ñ and would have made Scotland the first part of the UK to introduce a self-¿È¸µ³Îǧ¡¤¿Èʬ¾ÚÌÀ system for people who want to change gender.

Migrants cross the Channel on a dangerously overloaded small boat in March

Migrants cross the Channel on a ´í¸±¤Ë ÀѤߤ¹¤®¤ë small boat in March

It was a ¹âÅÙ¤Ë µÄÏÀ¤ÎŪ¤Ë¤Ê¤ë move and ºÇ½ªÅª¤Ë led to the downfall of Nicola Sturgeon. The SNP has been in ´íµ¡ ever since.

Yet at the time, Sunak ¡Êµ¡¤Î¡Ë¥«¥à in for ¸·¤·¤¤ Èãɾ , even from his own party, for challenging the Scottish ¹ñ²È¼çµÁ¼Ôs' À¯ºö.

A Tory member of the Scottish µÄ²ñ, Jamie Greene, ½Ò¤Ù¤ëd his move as a 'gift to proponents of independence', and the One-Nation Tory ²þ³×¡Ê¤¹¤ë¡Ë Group said his Éõº¿¤¹¤ë on Sturgeon's ˡΧÀ©Äê was '¿¼¤¯¡¤¶¯Îõ¤Ë ´Ø¿´ing' and would 'play into the ¼êÅϤ¹s of the SNP'.

How wrong they were. Sunak's sound judgment was also evident in his ¸ò¾Ä of the Windsor ÏÈÁȤß, which settled the ¾ò·ï of the EU's Ëǰסʤ¹¤ë¡Ë relations with ÃÏ°Ì¡¤Ç¤Ì¿¤¹¤ë-Brexit Northern Ireland and ʤ¤¦d the way for the return of the devolved µÄ²ñ in Belfast.

In reconciling the Áê°ã¤¹¤ë approaches of the Tories, the EU, Sinn Fein and, ºÇ½ªÅª¤Ë, the Democratic Unionists, he ÌÀ¤é¤«¤Ë¤¹¤ë¡¿Ï³¤é¤¹d himself to be a true political Áàºî¼Ô.

ͽ¬s of a major È¿Íð by Tory Euro-sceptics never materialised, for Sunak had read the room better than his critics.

He is far from out of the »Ù»ý¤òÆÀ¤è¤¦¤ÈÅؤá¤ëd yet, of course. Westminster is À䤨¤º abuzz with ²±Â¬ about leadership ´ë¤Æ¡¤ÅØÎÏ¡¤Äó°Æs, and such talk will no µ¿Ìä be ¿·¤¿¤Ë¤¹¤ëd when the party ÂѤ¨¤ës another ÂçÂÇ·â¤òÍ¿¤¨¤ëing at the Ãϸµ¤Î Áªµós next week.

Sunak can certainly come across as ÌÚ¤¤Î and over-rehearsed, but Èó¡¤ÉÔ¡¤Ìµ of his ²ÄǽÀ­¤Î¤¢¤ë ¸å·Ñ¼Ôs ¡½ such as ¾¦Çä¡¿»Å»ö Ĺ´± Kemi Badenoch, defence Ĺ´± ǧ¤á¤ë Shapps or leader of the ¤¢¤ê¤Õ¤ì¤¿s Penny Mordaunt ¡½ has anything like his Åö¶É, Ãμ±¿Í firepower or sense of ÌÜŪ.

'He is a ´°Á´¤Ë¤¹¤ë machine. I have never seen anything like it,' says one ¸ø¼°¤Î¡¿Ìò¿Í who worked at the ºâ̳¾Ê when Sunak was ¡Ê¥É¥¤¥Ä¤Ê¤É¤Î¡Ë¼óÁê¡¿¡ÊÂç³Ø¤Î¡Ë³ØĹ.

William Hague, his Á°Ç¤¼Ô as MP for Richmond (Yorks), is ³Î¤«¤Ê of the ÁíÍýÂç¿Ã's ¼Ás: 'I struggle to ²òǤ¤¹¤ë anyone with stronger ¤»¤¤¤Ë¤¹¤ës of ÃÎǽ, thoughtfulness and self-discipline.' And, as his ºÇ¶á¤Î pronouncements have shown, he is committed to Tory ¸¶Â§s.

?The ÊݼéŪ¤Ê ¸¶°ø¡Ê¤È¤Ê¤ë¡Ë may °æ¸Í¡¿ÊÛ¸î»ÎÀÊ be doomed, but at least under Sunak they will go É餫¤¹¡¿·âÄƤ¹¤ë fighting.