My bridesmaid asked to bring her fianc? to the bachelorette 週末 my sister is 支払う／賃金ing for so it can '二塁打 as their vacation'
- An American bride took to Reddit to get opinions on the heated 交流
- She 株d screenshots of the texts where the 演劇 went 負かす／撃墜する?
- READ MORE:?I was paid by a stranger to be the best man at his wedding
A bride has been left shocked after her cheeky bridesmaid 招待するd her boyfriend to the bachelorette party - and 推定する／予想するd her to 支払う／賃金 for it.?
The 混乱させるd bride from the US took to Reddit to get opinions, and 株d four screenshots of messages in the bridesmaid group 雑談（する）, where the 演劇 went 負かす／撃墜する.
It was 株d to the r/ChoosingBeggars 会議, which is 述べるd as 'a subreddit for 地位，任命するing screenshots, pictures, or stories of people who are 存在 way too picky when begging for things'.
In the 雑談（する）, the bridesmaid said she 手配中の，お尋ね者 her fianc? to come along to the hotel - which the bride's sister is 支払う／賃金ing for - so that they can use the hot tub and other 施設s, 追加するing: 'This 週末 肉親，親類d of （テニスなどの）ダブルス as our vacation.'
However, she got a short shrift from the bride's sister who wrote 支援する, 説: 'You should not bring your partner to 衝突，墜落 a bachelorette party. It's just rude.'?
In the 地位，任命する, she 株d four screenshots of messages in the bridesmaid group 雑談（する）, where the 演劇 went 負かす／撃墜する
The stunned bride 答える／応じるd 'I really don't think you should bring your partner to a bachelorette party...'
The conversation kicked off with the bridesmaid （人命などを）奪う，主張するing that someone else - 推定では the bride - had told her it would be 罰金 to bring her fianc? along to the bachelorette.??
She said she 手配中の，お尋ね者 to '二塁打 check how many rooms there are' and 追加するd 'it doesn't 事柄 if we have our own room but I just like having him next to me and 手配中の，お尋ね者 to go in the pool and the hot tub and everything with him.'
追加するing 'that 週末 肉親，親類d of （テニスなどの）ダブルス as our vacation.'?
She then went on to ask for the 詳細（に述べる）s as soon as possible 含むing what hotel they were staying at.
She wrote 'I'm very everything taken care of as soon as I can type of person. It'll all go on my calendar.'?
The stunned bride's sister 答える／応じるd 'I really don't think you should bring your partner to a bachelorette party...
Still 決定するd to get her beau to the bachelorette, the bridesmaid said 'So you'll 支払う／賃金 for a whole room for just me and I can't 株? And I just said it's not at the party'
'I 港／避難所't 選ぶd out a hotel yet or the rooms, but they are very expensive. I am not going to 補助金を支給する you and your boyfriend's vacation.'
The bridesmaids トン quickly turned snappy as she replied 'Fianc?, and it's not to the party just the hotel room.'?
Not 支援 負かす／撃墜する, the bride's sister said 'Let's just change it to partner. You should not bring your partner to 衝突，墜落 a bachelorette party. It's just rude.
She 追加するd: '[the bride] is too nice to tell you さもなければ. Fortunately I am not.'?
Still 決定するd to get her beau to the bachelorette, the bridesmaid said 'So you'll 支払う／賃金 for a whole room for just me and I can't 株? And I just said it's not at the party.'
The furious woman replied: 'I 絶対 would not 支払う／賃金 for a whole room for you, no. If you want to sleep in your own room with your partner and spend time with him at the hotel instead of the girls, you can 支払う／賃金 for your own room.'
Rather than わびるing, the bridesmaid frostily replied: 'Okay that's why I was asking not s tating. If it was my own room I would have brought him, that was the point of this conversation.'
Keeping her 冷静な／正味の, the bride's sister 追加するd: '陳謝s for the 混乱. Everyone is not going to get their own rooms. I am looking into 2 rooms to 株 権利 now, but the cost is around $600 for the two rooms for the two nights, so I 港／避難所't pulled the 誘発する／引き起こす yet.
The Reddit 地位，任命する has over 800 comments, the 大多数 of which are 味方するing with the bride
'I'll let you know before this 週末 which hotel I decide on so you can get your own room.'
However, the bridesmaid was still 混乱させるd, 説 she 'didn't know if there were more rooms or not' and her partner won't be coming if there are 株d rooms.
The bride's sister said: 'As long as your partner isn't with you, you are 解放する／自由な to 株 a room with the girls. If you bring your partner, you are 解放する／自由な to get your own room. Hope that （疑いを）晴らすs things up.'
She later 地位，任命するd on the thread to 明らかにする that some of the bridesmaids have 財政上の difficulties so that she is 支払う／賃金ing for the hotel to 確実にする that her sister has a 広大な／多数の／重要な time and everyone can be there.
'The bridesmaids know that I am covering the cost of the hotel, but I failed to make it （疑いを）晴らす that we would be 株ing the rooms,' she said. 'I thought this would be assumed, but we all know what assuming things does.'?
The Reddit attracted more than 800 comments, the 大多数 of which 味方するd with the bride and her sister.?
One husband wrote 'My wife couldn't 支払う／賃金 me to be anywhere 近づく the bachelorette party. Like go away and have a good time. Don't 招待する me and don't feel like you need to 接触する me unless you REALLY need/want to or its an 緊急.'
Reddit 使用者s are 味方するing with the bride, asking 'why in a million years would you ever say that to someone?'
Someone else joked 'This is going to be the most ぎこちない 週末 ever, can I come? I’m going to need my own room' with another replying 'I’m going to need a room also, but my partner will be joining. It’s really our honeymoon, hope you don’t mind 補助金を支給するing.'
One Reddit 使用者 said the whole 状況／情勢 seems a 'little 半端物': 'I'm more stuck on the fact she 手配中の，お尋ね者 to bring her partner on a bachelorette party. Is she not able to be away from him for a couple of days to hang out with the girls - the whole 推論する／理由 the trip was planned?
'Is she 推定する／予想するing him to hang out with everyone while you do girly things? Is she going to 主張する he come along?
'If she does bring him, assume she will take most of the time to be with him and 溝へはまらせる／不時着する the ギャング（団）. If she has paid for anything wh ere 財政／金融s are 連合させるd, I wonder if she will ask for money 支援する if she decides not to go and spend time with her partner.'?
However, not everyone thinks the bridesmaid is 存在 不当な
Another said: 'I would bet my entire life that if the fianc? was going to a stag 週末 with his mates, this type of 協定 would never even be a consideration. Even if (biiiiig if) he did want her there, he would never ask the groom/best man.'
However, not everyone thinks the bridesmaid is 存在 不当な - one 使用者 wrote: 'Based on the first few texts, it is 全く 不明瞭な how many rooms are 存在 gotten, so the 'beggar' is wondering why it’s 承認する for her to get a 解放する／自由な room alone, but it’s not ok to bring her boyfriend/fianc?.
'Whoever [not sure if Bride or MOH] is covering the cost of 2 rooms; of which all the girls will be 株ing space, which isn’t made （疑いを）晴らす until later.?
'If OP is planning to 分裂（する） that cost between the group, it’s 完全に 不明瞭な from any of those texts. 'Beggar' seems 完全に 罰金 存在 told no, it’s just both of them 明らかにするing their points 支援する and 前へ／外へ after that I don’t see this as 存在 choosy, or 存在 a beggar?
'I see it as a 混乱させるd person not having all the （警察などへの）密告，告訴（状）, and 存在 罰金 with 存在 told no.'
They 追加するd: 'Now why would she bring fianc? to a bachelorette party. That's a 完全に different craziness.'?
