Trans ロビー group Stonewall brands lesbians '性の 人種差別主義者s' for raising 関心s about 存在 圧力d into having sex with transgender women who still have male genitals

• e-mail

For many, it was a 勇敢に立ち向かう and long-延滞の 公表／放送 of an important and 苦しめるing 支配する: a painstaking 調査 into （人命などを）奪う，主張するs that predatory trans women have been 圧力ing lesbians for sex, published on the BBC News website.

But a 漏れるd email shows that the 影響力のある trans ロビー group Stonewall 試みる／企てるd to 抑える the 調査 before it had even been published ? and made the 驚くべき／特命の／臨時の （人命などを）奪う，主張する that 審議ing the 問題／発行するs was 同等（の） to ‘性の 人種差別主義’.

This 最新の move to try to stifle 解放する／自由な speech will 追加する to growing 関心s about the 影響（力） of Stonewall, which is paid millions of 続けざまに猛撃するs for advising public 団体／死体s ? 含むing 政府 departments, police 軍隊s and universities ? 加える a 範囲 of 私的な companies.

DON’T BETRAY US: Lesbians 抗議する at 存在 ostracised by trans 行動主義者s. Over 30,000 関係者s march at Pride in London Parade in 2015

Stonewall started as a （選挙などの）運動をする group for gay 権利s and has been 広範囲にわたって 拍手喝采する for its 決定的な work.

Today, however, it is 支配するd by the （選挙などの）運動をする for trans 権利s and controversially 始める，決めるs out to 促進する self-宣言するd ‘gender 身元’ ? the doctrine that people are whatever gender they say they are ? ahead of 生物学の sex.

It supports the belief, for example, that people with penises can be lesbians and those with vaginas can be gay men. Those who 同意しない, says Stonewall, are bigots.

Such is Stonewall’s 影響（力） that a former 補佐官 to Boris Johnson has （人命などを）奪う，主張するd the group has been 許すd to dictate 政府 政策 by 助言者s who 現在の him with ‘skewed’ プロの／賛成の-trans （警察などへの）密告，告訴（状）.

Earlier this month, the BBC followed several other high-profile 団体／死体s, 含むing Whitehall departments, in dropping its 会員の地位 of Stonewall’s 多様制 支持する／優勝者s programme.

Under the 計画／陰謀, 雇用者s 支払う／賃金 the ロビー group to help ‘embed LGBTQ+ 傾向’ in the way they work.

The BBC’s 告示 （機の）カム two weeks after the 会社／団体 published an 調査 by 新聞記者／雑誌記者 Caroline Lowbridge in which some lesbians told how they felt 圧力d into having a 性の 関係 with trans women ? 特に, men who say they are women but who have 保持するd their male genitals.

THE 調査 特記する／引用するd three lesbian women who said they 恐れるd 存在 labelled ‘transphobic’, and 危険d 存在 shunned and 脅すd by the gay and trans community if they 辞退するd to take trans women as partners.

People supporting the organization Stonewall which 作品 for the equality and 司法（官） for lesbians, gay men and bisexuals, during the Pride London on July 27 2015

They told Lowbridge they felt under a bizarre form of 圧力 to ‘受託する the idea that a penis can be a 女性（の） sex 組織／臓器’.

One told how she had been 述べるd as a ‘genital fetishist’ for only wanting to have 関係s with 生物学の women.

Another said: ‘I was told I 借りがあるd it to my trans sisters to unlearn my “genital 混乱”.’

The article also 含むd a 議論の的になる argument made by several trans 行動主義者s that 表明するing any preference in 性の partners should be considered ‘差別的な’ as such preferences often 除外する trans people.

This is いつかs referred to as ‘the cotton 天井’ ? a distasteful 言及／関連 to underwear 示唆するing that trans women a re systematically 封鎖するd from having 性の 関係s with 生物学の 女性（の）s.

The BBC won much 賞賛する for its 調査, which 誘発するd some lesbians to 表明する their 怒り／怒る at how they felt ostracised for wishing to form 関係s only with women.

選挙運動者 Kat Howard wrote that she was ‘incredibly 感謝する to Caroline Lowbridge, and the BBC for this article’, 追加するing: ‘We need help 保護するing young lesbians everywhere from an LGBT community that would rather see them silenced than stand up to the male 悪党／犯人s of 強襲，強姦.’

Yet now it has 現れるd that months before the article appeared Stonewall’s 長，指導者 (n)役員／(a)執行力のある Nancy Kelley wrote to the 編集（者）の director of BBC News to 公然と非難する Lowbridge’s work in an 明らかな 試みる／企てる to get her piece stopped.

In her email, Kelley 示唆するd that the BBC article would 結局最後にはーなる 存在 ‘transphobic’ because it 代表するd trans women as ‘性の predators’, which was a ‘central anti-trans argument’.

She その上の complained that the ‘高度に 有毒な’ cotton 天井 問題／発行する was ‘analogous to 問題／発行するs like 性の 人種差別主義’.

The 年次の Trans Pride parade makes its way from Wellington Arch next to Hyde Park 負かす／撃墜する to Soho square on 14 September 2019

And although she 定評のある that in 性の 関係s ‘同意 is 最高位の and we all want who we want’, she 追加するd that ‘構造上の 圧迫 can 影響（力） who we want’.

Which is to say that social bias, in this 事例／患者 against those who say they are trans, can 影響する／感情 even our most 私的な thoughts.

It is understood that it took many months of 編集（者）の discussions before the article was published on October 26.

Stonewall has appeared to 確認する that changes were made to the 初めの piece, although it remains 不明瞭な whether this was as a direct result of the 漏れるd email, sent in September 2020.

Nor is it known whether the 編集（者）の director of BBC News at the time, Kamal Ahmed, took any 活動／戦闘 based on the 明確な／細部 関心s raised by Kelley. He was made redundant in February.

同様に as 賞賛する, the article 誘発するd 集まり （民事の）告訴s from trans 権利s groups.

An open letter, from Trans Activism UK, had 20,000 署名s and 述べるd the article as ‘incredibly dangerous’ for 示唆するing the 問題／発行する of lesbians 存在 coerced into sex with trans women was 普及した.

The BBC received 4,819 （民事の）告訴s in the days に引き続いて 出版（物）, while 5,520 messages 賞賛するd its ニュース報道.

Angela Wild, a member of lesbian （選挙などの）運動をする group Get The L Out who was 引用するd in the article, told The Mail on Sunday: ‘For years lesbian 行動主義者s have been trying to get the message out that it is not bigoted to say “no” to 性の 圧力 from males who identify as women.

‘The fact that Nancy Kelley has でっちあげる，人を罪に陥れるd the 報告（する）／憶測ing of this 問題／発行する as transphobia is disgusting. Stonewall are a 不名誉 and no longer 代表する the 利益／興味s of lesbians.’

Author John Boyne 述べるd Stonewall as 権威主義者 for ‘telling gays how to think, who to date and betraying lesbians 完全に.’

The BBC 拒絶するd the （民事の）告訴s against the article arguing it had gone through ‘rigorous 編集（者）の 過程s’. 追加するing that its journalism should 調査する 問題／発行するs ‘even where there are 堅固に held positions’.

Last month, former BBC foreign 特派員 Paul 支持を得ようと努めるd told The Mail on Sunday there has been a ‘気候 of 恐れる’ at the 会社／団体 around 問題／発行するs of race and gender, with self-任命するd censors の中で the 放送者’s own staff.

rotesters 持つ／拘留する a 旗，新聞一面トップの大見出し／大々的に報道する during a 決起大会／結集させる at 議会 Square in October this year

支持を得ようと努めるd wrote that 関心d (n)役員／(a)執行力のあるs had 設立する themselves at the centre of a ‘culture war’.

Last month an 独立した・無所属 報告（する）／憶測 into the BBC 警告するd that ‘網状組織s’ of 内部の 影響（力） ? 含むing those 代表するing 性の 少数，小数派s ? could 影響する／感情 its 公平さ.

In a 声明 to The Mail on Sunday, Stonewall said: ‘We can 確認する that we wrote to the former 編集（者）の director 14 months ago to raise a 関心 about a previous 見解／翻訳／版 of the article that was 関連した to his 役割 in 支持するing the BBC’s 編集（者）の 指導基準s.’

The 放送者’s 撤退 from Stonewall’s 多様制 支持する／優勝者s programme 誘発するd a 抱擁する （激しい）反発, with many （民事の）告訴s from BBC staff.

When the 告示 was made, 会社／団体 (n)役員／(a)執行力のある Rhodri Talfan Davies 辞退するd to 確認する whether Stonewall had ever 首尾よく swayed its journalistic 生産（高）.

But speaking to 無線で通信する 4’s Women’s Hour last week, Kelley was open about her group’s 意向s. ‘I want Stonewall to have more 影響（力） on the 編集（者）の 政策 of the BBC,’ she said.

The 会社／団体’s 決定／判定勝ち（する） to abandon 関係 with Stonewall ? and publish the article ? 示唆するs the BBC is taking a much more 強健な approach

The 問題／発行する of the lobbyists’ 影響（力） on the BBC was also covered in a ten-part investigative podcast 肩書を与えるd Stonewall, made by presenter Stephen Nolan and 解放（する）d on BBC Sounds.

Stonewall chose not to engage with the series’ 製造者s.

Stonewall first 選ぶd to 含む transgender 問題／発行するs in 2015 under the leadership of Ruth 追跡（する）, now Baroness 追跡（する） of Bethnal Green, a crossbench peer who 以前 worked for the Equality Challenge 部隊, advising on 性の orientation and gender 身元 equality.

She was 後継するd by Kelley last year. The group has since become a vociferous 支持する／優勝者 of transgender 権利s, 誘発するing some ? 含むing two of the charity’s 創立者s, 放送者s Simon Fanshawe and Matthew Parris ? to 告発する／非難する Stonewall of abandoning the 利益／興味s of lesbians, gay men and bisexual people.

Under Kelley’s leadership, Stonewall believes that individuals have a ‘gender 身元’ based on how they feel inside, which is more important than their sex at birth.

条件 含むing ‘homosexual’, ‘gay’ and ‘lesbian’ have now been reframed to 言及する to ‘same-gender’ attraction ? rather tha n ‘same- sex’ attraction ? to 避ける 除外するing trans people.

This means, in 影響, that trans men ? 生物学の 女性（の）s ? who still 保持する their vaginas can be gay if they are attracted to men, while trans women ? 生物学の males ? with penises can be lesbians.

The BBC, which has paid 相当な sums to Stonewall under its 多様制 支持する／優勝者s programme, recently 可決する・採択するd these new 鮮明度／定義s in its 内部の 編集（者）の style guide. It is 不明瞭な whether these will remain.

Programmes such as 多様制 支持する／優勝者s earn Stonewall millions as 商売／仕事s 支払う／賃金 to be vetted on their woke 政策s.

条件 含むing ‘homosexual’, ‘gay’ and ‘lesbian’ have now been reframed to 言及する to ‘same-gender’ attraction ? rather than ‘same- sex’ attraction ? to 避ける 除外するing trans people (とじ込み／提出する photo)

Hundreds of thousands of 続けざまに猛撃するs have been spent on the programmes by 政府 depar tments alone.

存在 part of the 計画／陰謀 gives 雇用者s the chance to appear in the charity’s coveted 最高の，を越す 100 workplace 索引 if their 政策s 会合，会う Stonewall’s 是認.

Last year’s 名簿（に載せる）／表（にあげる） 含むd Sainsbury’s, MI6, Oxford University, Sussex Police, Barclays, the 省 of 司法（官） and the Army.

But those who have 削減（する） their links with the 計画／陰謀 含む Channel 4, Ofcom, Ofsted, the University of Essex, the Equality and Human 権利s （売買）手数料，委託（する）／委員会／権限 and several Whitehall departments.

Philosophy professor Kathleen 在庫／株 ? who was hounded out of Sussex University for 説 that 生物学の sex 事柄s and wrote about her experience in the MoS this month ? has （刑事）被告 Stonewall of helping 運動 a 気候 of bigotry in British universities.

A BBC 広報担当者 said: ‘Many people and organisations make 代表s to the BBC about さまざまな 面s of our ニュース報道.

‘BBC News is editorially 独立した・無所属 and the BBC alone decides what we broadcast or publish. The story is on our website for anyone to read.’

The BBC’s experience with Stonewall is just one fascinating example of how a host of organisations ? both public and 私的な ? are coming under 激しい 圧力 by a powerful ロビー group that many 恐れる is 原因（となる）ing 深遠な 損失 to the 権利s of women.