EXCLUSIVEÁªµó±¿Æ°¼Ôs ¼ûÍס¦Í׵᤹¤ëing Prince Harry's U.S. ¥Ó¥¶ be made public Éþ½¾¤µ¤»¤ë¡¿Äó½Ð¤¹¤ë '¶Ã¤¯¤Ù¤¡¿ÆÃÌ¿¤Î¡¿Î×»þ¤Î' comments by Joe Biden's U.K. ³°¸ò´±¡¿Âç»È to ºÛȽ´± in new ´ë¤Æ¡¤ÅØÎÏ¡¤Äó°Æ to make his °Ü̱¡¿°Ü½» status public
- ºÇ¿·¤Î ¿·¤¿¤ÊŸ³« in Freedom of ¡Ê·Ù»¡¤Ê¤É¤Ø¤Î¡ËÌ©¹ð¡¤¹ðÁʡʾõ¡Ë »öÎã¡¿´µ¼Ô over Prince Harry's ¥Ó¥¶ µÏ¿¡¤µÏ¿Åª¤Ê¡¿µÏ¿¤¹¤ës
- READ MORE:?Duke of Sussex says he has 'considered' U.S. »Ô̱¸¢
Áªµó±¿Æ°¼Ôs trying to ·³Ââ the ²òÊü¡Ê¤¹¤ë¡Ë of Prince Harry¡Çs U.S. ¥Ó¥¶ µÏ¿¡¤µÏ¿Åª¤Ê¡¿µÏ¿¤¹¤ës have submitted to a ºÛȽ´± what they called '¶Ã¤¯¤Ù¤¡¿ÆÃÌ¿¤Î¡¿Î×»þ¤Î¡Ç comments by Joe Biden¡Çs ³°¸ò´±¡¿Âç»È to the U.K.
³°¸ò´±¡¿Âç»È Jane Hartley recently said that Harry would never be ¹ñ³°ÄÉÊü¤¹¤ëd from the U.S. while Biden is ÂçÅýÎΡ¤¡¿¼ÒĹ.
The °ä»º ÁÏΩ¡¿´ðÁÃ, a Washington D.C.-based think Àï¼Ö¡¿¥¿¥ó¥¯, is ¸½ºß¡¿°ìÈÌ¤Ë ¹ðÁʤ¹¤ëing Biden's Department of Êì¹ñ °ÂÁ´ for Àܶá to the ²¦¼¼¤Î's °Ü̱¡¿°Ü½» papers.
It argued the ³°¸ò´±¡¿Âç»È's ȯ¸À¡¿½Ò¤Ù¤ës ÅÚÂæ¤òÊø¤¹d the Biden ¹ÔÀ¯'s ´ë¤Æ¡¤ÅØÎÏ¡¤Äó°Æ to keep the ʸ½ñs secret and »Ù±ç¤¹¤ëd up the »öÎã¡¿´µ¼Ô for ¸øɽ¤¹¤ë¡¿Ë½Ïª¤¹¤ëing them.
In a ¹çˡŪ¤Ê ¤È¤¸¹þ¤ß¡¿Äó½Ð¤¹¤ëing of over 100 pages in Washington D.C. the think Àï¼Ö¡¿¥¿¥ó¥¯ said ³°¸ò´±¡¿Âç»È Hartley's ȯ¸À¡¿½Ò¤Ù¤ës in a March 25 interview on Sky News were ¡È¶Ã¤¯¤Ù¤¡¿ÆÃÌ¿¤Î¡¿Î×»þ¤Î¡Ç and ¶¡µë¤¹¤ëd a transcript to ºÛȽ´± Carl Nichols.
Donald Trump said that '³èÆ°¡¿ÀïÆ®' could be taken against the Duke of Sussex if he is ÀßΩ¤¹¤ë to have lied about taking ËãÌôs on his US ¥Ó¥¶ »ÈÍÑ¡¿Å¬ÍÑ
It ¡Êµ¡¤Î¡Ë¥«¥à as ºÛȽ´± Nichols is reviewing µÏ¿¡¤µÏ¿Åª¤Ê¡¿µÏ¿¤¹¤ës relating to Harry's °Ü̱¡¿°Ü½» status and deciding whether they should be made public.
'³°¸ò´±¡¿Âç»È Hartley¡Çs À¼ÌÀs ·àŪ¤Ê ¹â¤á¤ë the already ÀâÆÀÎϤΤ¢¤ë public Íø±×¡¿¶½Ì£ in ¸øɽ¡¤Ë½Ïª,' the °ä»º ÁÏΩ¡¿´ðÁà said in its ¤È¤¸¹þ¤ß¡¿Äó½Ð¤¹¤ëing.
It said the ³°¸ò´±¡¿Âç»È 'selectively ¸øɽ¤¹¤ë¡¿Ë½Ïª¤¹¤ëd' ¾ÜºÙ¡Ê¤Ë½Ò¤Ù¤ë¡Ës while the DHS was 'Ʊ»þ¤Ë vigorously resisting any ¸øɽ¡¤Ë½Ïª in this »öÊÁ' and that 'should be considered' by the ºÛȽ´±.
The °ä»º ÁÏΩ¡¿´ðÁà wants Harry's ¥Ó¥¶ µÏ¿¡¤µÏ¿Åª¤Ê¡¿µÏ¿¤¹¤ës ²òÊü¡Ê¤¹¤ë¡Ëd to see if he ³Îǧ¤¹¤ëd on his »ÈÍÑ¡¿Å¬ÍÑ that he had used ËãÌôs, and if he was given any special ¼£ÎÅ by °Ü̱¡¿°Ü½» Åö¶É.?
In his memoir Spare, which was published after he moved to America in 2020, he ǧ¤á¤ë having °ÊÁ° used ËãÌôs ´Þ¤àing ¥Þ¥ê¥Õ¥¡¥Ê, ¥³¥«¥¤¥ó and ¸¸³ÐŪ¤Ê mushrooms.
U.S. ¥Ó¥¶ applicants are Í׵᤹¤ëd to make a disclo sure about any history of ËãÌô use, which can ¾×·â their »ÈÍÑ¡¿Å¬ÍÑ.
Lying on an »ÈÍÑ¡¿Å¬ÍÑ can result in ·ºÈ³¡¤È³Â§s ´Þ¤àing ¹ñ³°ÄÉÊü.
US ³°¸ò´±¡¿Âç»È Jane Hartley laughed off the suggestion Harry could be ¹ñ³°ÄÉÊü¤¹¤ëd, telling Sky News: 'It's not gonna happen in the Biden ¹ÔÀ¯'
Last month, Donald Trump said if Harry was ÀßΩ¤¹¤ë to have lied on his ¥Ó¥¶ »ÈÍÑ¡¿Å¬ÍÑ about ËãÌô-taking he would Áܤ·½Ð¤¹ to take 'appropriate ³èÆ°¡¿ÀïÆ®' if he becomes ÂçÅýÎΡ¤¡¿¼ÒĹ again.
Trump µñÀ䤹¤ë¡¿Äã²¼¤¹¤ëd to »ÙÇÛ¤¹¤ë out Harry ¸ºß ¹ñ³°ÄÉÊü¤¹¤ëd from the ÉôÂâd ÌÀ¸À¤¹¤ë¡¿¸øɽ¤¹¤ës.
When asked about Trump's comments ³°¸ò´±¡¿Âç»È Hartley said that was 'not going to happen in the Biden ¹ÔÀ¯.'
In its ¤È¤¸¹þ¤ß¡¿Äó½Ð¤¹¤ëing the °ä»º ÁÏΩ¡¿´ðÁà said the DHS had always »ý³¤¹¤ëd that 'Èó¡¤ÉÔ¡¤Ìµ of the ¡Ê·Ù»¡¤Ê¤É¤Ø¤Î¡ËÌ©¹ð¡¤¹ðÁʡʾõ¡Ë that we have can be ²òÊü¡Ê¤¹¤ë¡Ëd without ǧ¤á¤ëing what Prince Harry¡Çs °Ü̱¡¿°Ü½» status is or tipping our ¼êÅϤ¹ as to what it is.'
Interviewed for GB News by Nigel Farage last Tuesday, Donald Trump said Harry should not get 'special Æø¢s'
It went on: 'But on March 25 2024, the Hon. Jane Hartley, the ÉôÂâd ÌÀ¸À¤¹¤ë¡¿¸øɽ¤¹¤ës ³°¸ò´±¡¿Âç»È to the Ë¡ÄºÛȽ½ê of Saint James¡Çs did just that.?
'Hartley spoke ľÀÜ¡¿¤Þ¤Ã¤¹¤°¤Ë not only to the Duke of Sussex¡Çs ¸½ºß¤Î °Ü̱¡¿°Ü½» status, but HRH¡Çs ̤Íè °Ü̱¡¿°Ü½» status ƱÍͤË.'
The think Àï¼Ö¡¿¥¿¥ó¥¯ argued that ÅÚÂæ¤òÊø¤¹d the DHS argument that the ¡Ê·Ù»¡¤Ê¤É¤Ø¤Î¡ËÌ©¹ð¡¤¹ðÁʡʾõ¡Ë must be kept secret.
It said: '³°¸ò´±¡¿Âç»È Hartley spoke ľÀÜ¡¿¤Þ¤Ã¤¹¤°¤Ë to some of the very ¡Ê·Ù»¡¤Ê¤É¤Ø¤Î¡ËÌ©¹ð¡¤¹ðÁʡʾõ¡Ë ´Ø¿´ing the Duke of Sussex¡Çs °Ü̱¡¿°Ü½» status sought by ¸¶¹ð¡¿ÄóÁÊ¿Ís¡Ç FOIA (Freedom of ¡Ê·Ù»¡¤Ê¤É¤Ø¤Î¡ËÌ©¹ð¡¤¹ðÁʡʾõ¡Ë ¹Ô°Ù¡¿Ë¡Îá¡¿¹ÔÆ°¤¹¤ë) Request - ¡Ê·Ù»¡¤Ê¤É¤Ø¤Î¡ËÌ©¹ð¡¤¹ðÁʡʾõ¡Ë DHS has ·«¤êÊÖ¤·¤Æ told this Ë¡ÄºÛȽ½ê must be kept confidential.'
In the ¤È¤¸¹þ¤ß¡¿Äó½Ð¤¹¤ëing Harry was referred to as 'HRH Prince Henry Charles Albert David George, the Duke of Sussex, Earl of Dumbarton, and Baron Kilkeel K.C.V.O.¡Çs (¡ÈHRH¡ É or ¡ÈDuke of Sussex¡É).'?
Harry has said he is considering becoming a US ¹ṉ̃
Nile Gardiner, Director of the °ä»º ÁÏΩ¡¿´ðÁÃ's Margaret Thatcher Ãæ¿´ for Freedom, said: 'The US ³°¸ò´±¡¿Âç»È to London¡Çs arrogant ȯ¸À¡¿½Ò¤Ù¤ës on Prince Harry are an ¶Ã¤¯¤Ù¤¡¿ÆÃÌ¿¤Î¡¿Î×»þ¤Î ²ðÆþ by a ¾åµé¤Î U.S. ³°¸ò´± on an ¸½ºß¿Ê¹ÔÃæ¤Î Ϣˮ¤Î Ë¡ÄºÛȽ½ê »öÎã¡¿´µ¼Ô.
'The US ³°¸ò´±¡¿Âç»È¡Çs ȯ¸À¡¿½Ò¤Ù¤ës ÌÀ³Î¤Ë spoke ľÀÜ¡¿¤Þ¤Ã¤¹¤°¤Ë not only to the Duke of Sussex¡Çs ¸½ºß¤Î °Ü̱¡¿°Ü½» status, but to Prince Harry¡Çs ̤Íè °Ü̱¡¿°Ü½» status ƱÍͤË.'
He Äɲ乤ëd: 'The Biden ¹ÔÀ¯ has gone to ¹Âç¤Ê¡¿Â¿¿ô¤Î¡¿½ÅÍ×¤Ê lengths to Êݸ¤ë Prince Harry, and has even »ÙÇÛ¤¹¤ëd out the possible ¹ñ³°ÄÉÊü of the Duke of Sussex if he lied on his U.S. °Ü̱¡¿°Ü½» »ÈÍÑ¡¿Å¬ÍÑ and ¿¯³²¤¹¤ë¡¿°ãÈ¿¤¹¤ëd US °Ü̱¡¿°Ü½» ˡΧ.
'The Biden ¹ÔÀ¯ has ¹Ô°Ù¡¿Ë¡Îá¡¿¹ÔÆ°¤¹¤ëd without transparency and accountability to the American people regarding the °ä»º ÁÏΩ¡¿´ðÁáÇs Freedom of ¡Ê·Ù»¡¤Ê¤É¤Ø¤Î¡ËÌ©¹ð¡¤¹ðÁʡʾõ¡Ë request relating to Prince Harry¡Çs US °Ü̱¡¿°Ü½» »ÈÍÑ¡¿Å¬ÍÑ. They should ²òÊü¡Ê¤¹¤ë¡Ë Harry¡Çs i mmigration µÏ¿¡¤µÏ¿Åª¤Ê¡¿µÏ¿¤¹¤ës to the American people.'
ÃÏ¶è ºÛȽ´± Carl Nichols who is Åý³ç¤¹¤ëing over the »öÎã¡¿´µ¼Ô in Washington D.C.
SPARE, the memoir of Prince Harry, The Duke of Sussex, was published globally on January 10, 2023
Earlier this week, the DHS ¼êÅϤ¹d over ʸ½ñs relating to Harry' ¥Ó¥¶ to ºÛȽ´± Nichols.
The ºÛȽ´± had ordered the DHS to ¶¡µë¤¹¤ë more ¡Ê·Ù»¡¤Ê¤É¤Ø¤Î¡ËÌ©¹ð¡¤¹ðÁʡʾõ¡Ë about why his °Ü̱¡¿°Ü½» ¾ÜºÙ¡Ê¤Ë½Ò¤Ù¤ë¡Ës should not be ²òÊü¡Ê¤¹¤ë¡Ëd.
The DHS said that it ½¾¤¦d with the order by submitting 'Àë¸Às with attachments for ex parte in camera [in »äŪ¤Ê] review' ·Ðͳ¤Ç an encrypted link.
U.S. °Ü̱¡¿°Ü½» Åö¶É routinely ask about ËãÌô use on ¥Ó¥¶ »ÈÍÑ¡¿Å¬ÍÑs.
In the past British celebrities ´Þ¤àing singer Amy Winehouse and model Kate Moss have run into difficulties.
But ǧ¤á¤ëing past ËãÌô use does not ¤ä¤à¤òÆÀ¤º result in (a)¼«Æ°Åª¤Ê¡¿(n)¼«Æ°·ý½Æ µñÀä.
The DHS said from the beginning that it could not ²òÊü¡Ê¤¹¤ë¡Ë the Duke's ¥Ó¥¶ »ÈÍÑ¡¿Å¬ÍÑ, Îá¾õing in a Ë¡ÄºÛȽ½ê ¤È¤¸¹þ¤ß¡¿Äó½Ð¤¹¤ëing: 'Ë¡ÄºÛȽ½ês ½ª»Ï°ì´Ó¤·¤Æ »ý¤Ä¡¿¹´Î±¤¹¤ë that a person's ¥Ó¥¶ or °Ü̱¡¿°Ü½» status is »äŪ¤Ê, personal ¡Ê·Ù»¡¤Ê¤É¤Ø¤Î¡ËÌ©¹ð¡¤¹ðÁʡʾõ¡Ë ÌȽü¤µ¤ì¤¿ from ¸øɽ¡¤Ë½Ïª.
'ÆäË, the µÏ¿¡¤µÏ¿Åª¤Ê¡¿µÏ¿¤¹¤ës would ÌÀ¤é¤«¤Ë¤¹¤ë¡¿Ï³¤é¤¹ the types of ʸ½ñs that Prince Harry used to travel to the ÉôÂâd ÌÀ¸À¤¹¤ë¡¿¸øɽ¤¹¤ës, his admission status, and any °Ü̱¡¿°Ü½», or Èó¡¤ÉÔ¡¤Ìµ-°Ü̱¡¿°Ü½», Íø±×s that he may have sought.'
After a ¿³Íý¡¤¸øÄ°²ñ in February, ºÛȽ´± Nichols told the DHS its arguments were 'insufficiently ¾ÜºÙ¡Ê¤Ë½Ò¤Ù¤ë¡Ëd' for him to make a Ƚ·è¡¤ºÛÄê.