Harvey Weinstein's 強姦 有罪の判決 overturned over '決定的な mistake' by New York 裁判官... and he could now walk 解放する/自由な
- New York 法廷,裁判所 of 控訴,上告s has overturned Harvey Weinstein's 強姦 有罪の判決
- The movie mogul, 72, was serving 23 years in 刑務所,拘置所 for 重罪 sex 罪,犯罪s
- He will remain in 刑務所,拘置所 予定 to his 有罪の判決 in Los Angeles for another 強姦?
Harvey Weinstein's New York 強姦 and 性の 強襲,強姦 有罪の判決s have been 劇的な overturned after an 控訴,上告s 法廷,裁判所 支配するd the 裁判官 made a '決定的な' error in his 扱うing of the 事例/患者.?
The New York 法廷,裁判所 of 控訴,上告s 支配するd on Thursday that the 不名誉d movie 生産者 did not receive a fair 裁判,公判 when he was 罪人/有罪を宣告するd in 2020.
The bombshell 判決,裁定 made by New York's highest 法廷,裁判所 will not 解放する/自由な him from 刑務所,拘置所, as he still has another 有罪の判決 in Los Angeles for a separate 強姦, which his team is also 控訴,上告ing.
Weinstein, 72, has been serving 23 years in a New York 刑務所,拘置所 for the two sex attacks against aspiring actress Jessica Mann and 生産/産物 assistant Mimi Haleyi. He was 手渡すd a その上の 16 years に引き続いて his 有罪の判決 in LA in 2022.
Weinstein became the 直面する of the #MeToo movement after dozens of women (機の)カム 今後 主張するing 性の 乱用. Thursday's 決定/判定勝ち(する) was 述べるd as 'profoundly 不正な' by his accusers.
Iranian 大統領,/社長 Ebrahim Raisi is 伴う/関わるd in ヘリコプター '出来事/事件'
LIZ JONES: Give Harry and Meghan the best 周年記念日 gift.
地図/計画する 明らかにする/漏らすs anti-to urism 抗議するs and 支配するs spreading over Europe
A new 裁判,公判 has been ordered after it was 決定するd 司法(官) James M. Burke, who 統括するd over Weinstein's New York City 事例/患者 in 2020, made a '決定的な' mistake during the 初期の 裁判,公判.?
In a 4-3 決定/判定勝ち(する), the 控訴人,上告人 法廷,裁判所 決定するd that the 裁判官 Burke had made an error in 許すing women to 証言する who were not part of the 事例/患者.?
'It is an 乱用 of judicial discretion to 許す untested 主張s of nothing more than bad 行為 that destroys a 被告's character but sheds no light on their 信用性 as 関係のある to the 犯罪の 告発(する),告訴(する)/料金s 宿泊するd against them,'?the 決定/判定勝ち(する) read.
'The news today is not only disheartening, but it's profoundly 不正な,' a 声明 from Silence Breakers, the group behind the #MeToo movement said.
'But this 判決,裁定 does not 減らす the 有効性,効力 of our experiences or our truth; it's 単に a 後退. The man 設立する 有罪の continues to serve time in a California 刑務所,拘置所.
'We continue to stand strong and 支持する for that change. We will continue to fight for 司法(官) for 生存者s everywhere.'
Actress Ashley Judd, one of the first to 公然と 告発する/非難する Weinstein, 株d her 失望 with the 判決,裁定.
?'That's really hard for the 生存者s … We still live in our truth. And we know what happened,' she told the New York Times.
But Weinstein's lawyer あられ/賞賛するd the 決定/判定勝ち(する) as, 'not just a victory for Mr Weinstein, but for every 犯罪の 被告 in the 明言する/公表する of New Yor k'.
'We compliment the 法廷,裁判所 of 控訴,上告s for 支持するing the most basic 原則s that a 犯罪の 被告 should have in a 裁判,公判,' he told the 出口.
Manhattan 地区 弁護士/代理人/検事 Alvin Bragg 公約するd to do 'everything?in our 力/強力にする' to retry the 事例/患者, 追加するing his office, 'remains 確固たる in our かかわり合い to 生存者s of 性の 強襲,強姦.'
If his second 控訴,上告 against his Los Angeles is successful, the shamed film boss could walk 解放する/自由な.?
弁護 弁護士/代理人/検事 示す Werksman who defended Weinstein in the LA 事例/患者 was 楽観的な about his chances.
‘This is a 広大な/多数の/重要な 結果 and the 権利 result. We 直面するd the same 根底となる unfairness in the Los Angeles 事例/患者 where the 裁判官 許すd the 陪審/陪審員団 to hear 証拠 about four uncharged and unproven 主張s of 性の 強襲,強姦, Werksman told DailyMail.com.
'It’s impossible to get a fair 裁判,公判 when the 起訴’s 事例/患者 consists of more uncharged 行為/法令/行動するs than 告発(する),告訴(する)/料金d. The 事例/患者 here should be 逆転するd in the same fashion as the New York 事例/患者.’
Weinstein was 刑務所,拘置所d in New York for the two attacks in 2006 and 2013. He was 罪人/有罪を宣告するd of third degree 強姦 against Mann and 犯罪の 性の 行為/法令/行動する against Haleyi, but acquitted of first degree 強姦 and two counts of predatory 性の 強襲,強姦.
The 法廷,裁判所 heard Mann was attacked by Weinstein in a Manhattan hotel room in 2013.
Haleyi 証言するd that he 強制的に 成し遂げるd oral sex on her in his apartment while she had her period in 2006.
The predatory 性の 強襲,強姦 告発(する),告訴(する)/料金, which was the most serious, 会社にする/組み込むd Sopranos actress?Anabella Sciorra's 主張 that she was 強姦d by Weinstein in her Manhattan apartment in the 中央の-1990s.?
Sciorra's 主張 was too old to be 告発(する),告訴(する)/料金d on its own because of the 法令 of 制限s, but 賠審員s had to consider it as a basis for 告発(する),告訴(する)/料金s 主張するing Weinstein is a 性の predator.?
In total, six women took to the stand to give harrowing accounts of 申し立てられた/疑わしい 乱用.
衣装 designer 夜明け Dunning, model Tarale Wulff and actress Lauren Marie Young were の中で those who 証言するd they were enticed into 会合 Weinstein for professional 推論する/理由s and then groped or 強姦d.
Weinstein was given an 付加 16 year 宣告,判決 in Los Angeles に引き続いて 有罪の判決 for a 強姦 which took place in 2013.
The 犠牲者 was attacked by the shamed Miramax boss at a hotel room after a film festival, but only (機の)カム 今後 after #MeToo opened the floodgates against him.?
Weinstein was acquitted in Los Angeles on 告発(する),告訴(する)/料金s?against Mann who 申し立てられた/疑わしい he also 強姦d her in California.
Weinstein's lawyers argued 裁判官 James Burke's 判決,裁定s in 好意 of the 起訴 turned the 裁判,公判 into '1-800-GET-HARVEY.'?
But Wigdor 法律, which 代表するd eight of Weinstein's accusers 含むing two connected to the New York 裁判,公判, 爆破d the 控訴,上告 法廷,裁判所's 判決,裁定.
'Today's 決定/判定勝ち(する) is a major step 支援する in 持つ/拘留するing those accountable for 行為/法令/行動するs of 性の 暴力/激しさ.?
'法廷,裁判所s routinely 収容する/認める 証拠 of other uncharged 行為/法令/行動するs where they 補助装置 陪審/陪審員団s in understanding 問題/発行するs 関心ing the 意図, modus operandi or 計画/陰謀 of the 被告.?
'The 陪審/陪審員団 was 教えるd on the relevance of this 証言 and overturning the 判決 is 悲劇の in that it will 要求する the 犠牲者s to 耐える yet another 裁判,公判.'?
The 判決,裁定 was 手渡すd 負かす/撃墜する by 裁判官 Jenny Rivera, with 長,指導者 裁判官 Rowan D. Wilson and 裁判官s Betsy Barros and Christine Clark concurring.
裁判官s Madeline Singas, Michael Garcia and An thony Cannataro dissented, while?裁判官s Shirley Troutman and Caitlin Halligan took no part.
In a scathing dissent, 裁判官 Singas (刑事)被告 the 大多数 裁判官s of 'whitewashing the facts to 適合する to a he-said/she-said narrative'.
'The 大多数's 決意 perpetuates outdated notions of 性の 暴力/激しさ and 許すs predators to escape accountability,' Singas said.
The 逆転 of his 有罪の判決 is the second major #MeToo 後退 in the last two years, after the U.S. 最高裁判所 辞退するd to hear an 控訴,上告 of a Pennsylvania 法廷,裁判所 決定/判定勝ち(する) to throw out 法案 Cosby's 性の 強襲,強姦 有罪の判決.
Weinstein's 有罪の判決 stood for more than four years, 先触れ(する)d by 行動主義者s and 支持するs as a milestone 業績/成就, but dissected just as quickly by his lawyers and, later, the 法廷,裁判所 of 控訴,上告s when it heard arguments on the 事柄 in February.
New York 明言する/公表する of 控訴,上告s 長,指導者 裁判官 Janet DiFiore 支配するd that Weinstein's 控訴,上告 could proceed in 2022.
At the time, his lawyer Arthur Aidala argued that women who did not form part of the 犯罪の 主張s should not have been 許すd to take the stand and 証言する about 申し立てられた/疑わしい sex 乱用 by his (弁護士の)依頼人.
He also?申し立てられた/疑わしい that one 賠審員 did not 公表する/暴露する they'd 以前 written a 調書をとる/予約する on 性の predators, which he said should have disqualified them from serving.?
Weinstein 否定するd the 告発(する),告訴(する)/料金s against him and?主張するd that his relations with the women were consensual.
More than 80 women (機の)カム 今後 to 告発する/非難する the Oscar-winning 生産者 of 性の 強襲,強姦 and いやがらせ.?
The 主張s first surfaced 公然と in a New York Times story in 2017 詳細(に述べる)ing 10年間s of 申し立てられた/疑わしい 乱用.
Actresses Rose McGowan and Ashley Judd were の中で those who were 指名するd in the piece as accusers.?
The 主張s 誘発するd a sea change in 態度s に向かって 性の 不品行/姦通 in the workplace.
Comments
Comments
{{formattedShortCount}}
comments