A 首相 League '高級な 税金' would 許す clubs outside the 'Big Seven' to dream and compete just as it should be, 令状s MIKE KEEGAN
- But 除去するing the ultimate 罰 could 土台を崩す the whole system, 特に for those for whom money is no 反対する
‘There's only one thing 首相 League clubs have in ありふれた,’ one 最高の，を越す-flight (n)役員／(a)執行力のある recently told me. ‘They’re all in it for themselves.’
It should, then, come as little surprise that 協定 on a new system to 取って代わる the 現在の 利益（をあげる） and Sustainability 支配するs (PSR) remains, によれば another, ‘a million miles off’.
There is, however, one point on which most agree ― when these 規則s were brought in, nobody thought the likes of Nottingham Forest and Everton would be the 犠牲者s.
Two clubs that have ‘had a go’ have ended up 存在 the ones that the 首相 League 力／強力にするs have gone after.
Is this what we want? A league in which those at the 最高の，を越す pull up the drawbridge? A lifetime in which the same small number pass the 首相 League 肩書を与える between them?
It's 恐れるd by clubs they won't be able to attract the best players in 未来 予定 to the PSR 支配するs (pictured 首相 League CEO Richard Masters)
Everton 苦しむd a six-point deduction this 称する，呼ぶ／期間／用語 for breaking 利益（をあげる） and Sustainability 支配するs
首相 League clubs are discussing the 可能性 of bring in an NBA style 高級な 税金 as a 許可／制裁 to PSR 支配する 違反s
A ‘競争’ where anyone who has the cash to make the dreams of long-苦しむing 支持者s come true is stopped in their 跡をつけるs?
So the ‘高級な 税金’ idea 明らかにする／漏らすd by Mail Sport today ― where clubs can spend what they want and 支払う／賃金 罰金s if they overspend ― would 許す those outside the Big Six to have those dreams and, should it be 提携させるd with the ultimate 脅し of a points deductions (to stop those for whom money is no 反対する) from その上の distorting the playing field, it could work.
Forest and Everton are not the only ones 傷つけるing. A chairman at a cash-strapped EFL club 公表する／暴露するd they had a 最高の，を越す- flight team lined up to buy one of their best young players.?
The 料金 had been agreed and the cash would have gone a long way に向かって them 存在 able to see out their season without 財政上の 恐れるs.
But when news of Everton’s points deduction landed, the 申し込む／申し出 was taken off the （米）棚上げする／（英）提議する. The buying club were spooked and the EFL club would have to find another way of making it to the finish line. Bravo.
首相 League insiders are 毅然とした that any new ‘高級な 税金’ 提案 would 保持する the 脅し of what they 称する，呼ぶ／期間／用語 ‘冒険的な 許可／制裁s’ ― not just 罰金s ― and you can see why.?
Nottingham Forest were 攻撃する，衝突する with a four-points deduction this season too for the same 許可／制裁 as Everton
Alignment with UEFA is likely to be central to whatever the 解答 is. (Pictured UEFA 大統領，／社長 Aleksander Ceferin)
除去するing the ultimate 罰 of a points deduction could 土台を崩す the whole system, 特に for those for whom money is no 反対する. Should the 税金 come in the feeling is it would 効果的に make points deductions a thing of the past as the spending wriggle room 供給するd would be 十分な.?
The 見解（をとる） would be that only clubs who show an utter 無視（する） and 乱用 the new landscape would see points ドッキングする／減らす／ドックに入れるd as a last 訴える手段／行楽地.
Other 提案s are also 存在 worked up, 含むing the depressing prospect of ‘錨，総合司会者ing’. Such a system would see the 量 of permitted spend tied to that of the 底（に届く） club, with 4.5 times also 討議するd.?
If, as looks likely, Sheffield 部隊d finish 底（に届く） this year, then would we really 推定する／予想する a Manchester City, whose last accounts 明らかにする／漏らすd a 行う 法案 of around £400m, to only be permitted 支払う／賃金 4.5 times that of the Blades whose 人物／姿／数字 last season, admittedly in the 選手権, was around £48.6m? Bring your trolleys Europe ― there are 取引s to be had at the Etihad.
On a 正規の／正選手 basis a 思い出の品 減少（する）s that the 財政上の 支配するs are not working. Clubs are 引き上げ（る）ing season ticket prices as they look for ways to 減ずる the losses. It can’t be 権利 that fans are having to fork out so clubs can 確実にする they don’t ‘overspend’.
Earlier this week Tottenham 発表するd losses of £86.8m. They are not alone. With a couple of exceptions ― honourable について言及する for Brighton ― the 広大な 大多数 of 首相 League clubs make 注目する，もくろむ-watering 赤字s every year. But if they can afford them, or they are 一時的な, where’s the 害（を与える）? Tottenham are 支払う／賃金ing off their stadium, the best in the land. Surely they shouldn’t be punished for that?
There is a growing 失望／欲求不満 の中で some clubs at a perceived 欠如（する） of leadership and 指導／手引 from the 首相 League.
Rightly or wrongly comparisons of the 現在の 政権 and that of Richard Scudamore have been made. The former 長，指導者 exec would ‘行為／行う the clubs like an orchestra’ and would almost never put a 投票（する） on the （米）棚上げする／（英）提議する without knowing 正確に／まさに what the result would be.
A （疑いを）晴らす, defined position on what would be best for the league.
However, given his ability to read the room, some wondered if Scudamore left be 原因（となる） he saw this coming. A league in which self-利益／興味 would 勝利 the 集団の／共同の.?
It remains to be seen where this 行き詰まり leaves the いわゆる ‘New 取引，協定’ and an 協定 on 財政上の 議席数是正 to EFL clubs?
It remains to be seen where this 行き詰まり leaves the いわゆる ‘New 取引，協定’ and an 協定 on 財政上の 議席数是正 to EFL clubs. Some believe the 状況／情勢 is preposterous and, in a 解放する／自由な market, 資本主義者 country it is hard to 同意しない.
The 姿勢 is becoming more bullish as time passes. As Mail Sport has 以前 報告（する）／憶測d, there is a growing feeling that should 政府 試みる／企てる to crowbar a 決意／決議 that is unpalatable to 首相 League clubs then they will see them in 法廷，裁判所.
The 首相 League would no 疑問 反対する 説 that they will 調査する every avenue before it gets to that 行う／開催する／段階.
All 注目する，もくろむs, then, are on June. No 発生地 has yet been 確認するd for the 会合. Given the 推定する／予想するd 花火s, it might be an idea to make it al fresco.
