Neil Woodford is 支援する as a finfluencer: You may remember me as the '不名誉d' 基金 経営者／支配人
- 'Woodford 見解（をとる）s' （人命などを）奪う，主張するs to 申し込む／申し出 readers an 代案／選択肢 to '合意 thinking'
A challenge to '合意 thinking'? Neil Woodford has returned with a new blog and newsletter
'You may remember me as the 基金 経営者／支配人 who 避けるd the dot-com 泡 and the banking 危機.... or perhaps as the "不名誉d" 基金 経営者／支配人 who 統括するd over Woodford 投資 管理／経営's 崩壊（する） in 2019.'
Those are the words of Neil Woodford, who has?re-現れるd with a newsletter and blog - （人命などを）奪う，主張するing to 申し込む／申し出 readers an 代案／選択肢 to '合意 thinking' - just a week after the City 監視者 爆破d the former 基金 経営者／支配人's しっかり掴む of 危険 管理／経営.
And while there may be many 投資家s 気が進まない to follow the advice of the man who famously 衝突，墜落d his 巨大（な） 公正，普通株主権 income 基金, his Woodford 見解（をとる）s blog has 即時に become the talk of the 投資 world.
Woodford 投資 管理／経営 imploded in 2019 after its once-£3.7billion 基金 c ollapsed when 投資家s 急ぐd to the 出口 in droves まっただ中に a 支えるd period of underperformance.
The 崩壊（する） of Woodford 公正，普通株主権 Income left some 300,000 投資家s 立ち往生させるd and left to wait five years to be 補償するd with a fraction of the 資本／首都 they had ゆだねるd with the 基金 経営者／支配人.
Now Mr Woodford has taken to Instagram, X and a newly-開始する，打ち上げるd website to help readers 'navigate the 複雑さs of 財政上の markets'.
Last week the 財政上の 行為／行う 当局, which is yet to take any formal 許可／制裁s against Mr Woodford, said he had a '欠陥のある and unreasonably 狭くする understanding' of his 責任／義務 for managing 'liquidity 危険s' ? the need to be able to turn 資産s into cash.
It is not （疑いを）晴らす how or if Mr Woodford ーするつもりであるs to 利益（をあげる） from his 最新の 投機・賭ける, which follows the 失敗 of a new 基金 商売／仕事, WCM Partners, in 2021.?
In his first Woodford 見解（をとる）s 地位，任命する, he said: 'You m ay remember me as the 基金 経営者／支配人 who 避けるd the dot-com 泡 and the banking 危機 and 配達するd 索引-（警官の）巡回区域，受持ち区域ing 業績／成果 for over 25 years, or perhaps as the "不名誉d" 基金 経営者／支配人 who 統括するd over Woodford 投資 管理／経営's 崩壊（する） in 2019.
'Others may not have heard of me at all. Whatever your 視野, you may be curious about what I have to say about a wide 範囲 of 経済的な, social, and political 問題／発行するs that 衝撃 our everyday lives.'
He 追加するd that much UK 経済的な commentary 'is long on opinion but 批判的に short on data', 示唆するing this is 'because 設立するd narratives are too willingly 受託するd'.
Mr Woodford said: 'The 経済的な 分析 and commentary in Woodford 見解（をとる）s will 焦点（を合わせる） on 関連した facts and data without 検閲 from editors, 圧力 to toe a particular line or 合意 thinking.'
Why did Woodford 投資 管理／経営 崩壊（する）?
Neil Woodford had a successful 25-year career when 雇うd by Invesco, where his 基金s racked up billions of 続けざまに猛撃するs of 投資 from 小売 投資家s and 会・原則s alike on the 支援する of bumper returns.
When he struck out on his own in 2014 投資家s 自然に followed into the Woodford 患者 資本／首都 信用, the Woodford Income 焦点（を合わせる） 基金 and ? crucially ? the Woodford 公正，普通株主権 Income 基金 (WEIF).
WEIF's 初期の good run was followed by two years of poor 業績／成果, 悪化させるd by （危険などに）さらす to smaller ? いつかs 無益な ? companies and unlisted 在庫／株s.
結局 larger 投資家s, such as the Kent 郡 会議 年金 計画／陰謀, started pulling out large 量s of money.
Others followed 控訴 and the 基金's large （危険などに）さらす to illiquid 資産s meant it was unable to sell 資産s quick enough to 会合，会う outflows, 主要な to adm inistrator Link 軍隊ing its 中断.
St. James's Place then 終結させるd Woodford's 契約 to manage three of its 基金s.
The 決定／判定勝ち（する） to の近くに WEIF 完全に in October 2019 left many 投資家s out of pocket and 最終的に led to the demise of Woodford 投資 管理／経営.
投資家s are only now receiving 補償（金） for the Woodford 崩壊（する）.
