Should we stop dragging people into 税金s 初めは designed for the rich? This is Money podcast
Almost five times as many people will soon be 支払う／賃金ing 40 per cent 税金 than in the 早期に 1990s, when it was seen as a 税金 bracket reserved for the rich, the 学校／設ける for 会計の 熟考する／考慮するs 警告するd this week.
It said that 会計の drag 誘発する／引き起こすd by 氷点の the higher 率 税金 threshold would pull 7.8million people into its 逮捕する by 2027.
The 熟考する／考慮する 示唆するd that the threshold would have to be almost 二塁打d from its 現在の level, at £50,271, to almost £100,000 to return the 税金 禁止（する）d to the level ーするつもりであるd for it.
と一緒に the 報告（する）／憶測, （機の）カム an IFS 警告 on 40 per cent 税金, 明言する／公表するing that it had stopped 存在 the 保存する of high-収入 professionals and was now hitting electricians, plumbers, teachers, nurses and more.
The taxman nabbing 40p of every 続けざまに猛撃する earned from a 支払う／賃金 rise rather than 20p comes at a time when 労働者s are running to stand still, with インフレーション at just above 10 per cent.
So, is it time the 政府 stopped 税金ing by stealth and using 道具s like 会計の drag ? instead raising thresholds with インフレーション or 給料?
And is it time to 引き上げ（る） the higher 率 threshold and pull people 支援する 負かす／撃墜する to basic 率 税金?
On this podcast, Georgie 霜, 物陰／風下 Boyce and Simon Lambert discuss the 厄介な 問題／発行する of 税金 and who counts as 豊富な.
The 審議 moves on to 相続物件 税金 ? another 徴収する designed for the very rich but now hitting the 豊富な middle classes. Why is IHT so 人気がない when most don’t 支払う／賃金 it and does it need 改革（する）?
加える, how much have you lost to インフレーション, will you get 全国的な’s new £100 Fairer 株 bung, and finally, would you buy food two years past its best before date for big 貯金?
