Who's afraid of a no-取引，協定 Brexit? What the next PM taking us out of Europe without a 取引，協定 means for your money - This is Money podcast??

• e-mail

The 脅し of no 取引，協定 is ぼんやり現れるing larger ? just a few months after people had decided a softer Brexit was on the cards.

This week we had the Office of 予算 責任／義務's 判決 on what a 'benign' no-取引，協定 Brexit シナリオ might look like for the economy. It would cost us £30billion, 失業 would rise to 5%, the 続けざまに猛撃する would 落ちる 10% and house prices would go 負かす／撃墜する by the same 量.

And that's not based on the 国際通貨基金's worst 事例／患者 シナリオ. The （ドイツなどの）首相／（大学の）学長 said things could 現実に be more painful, Jacob Rees-Mogg 示唆するd it was the wrong way 一連の会議、交渉／完成する and we could be £80billion richer.

So could no 取引，協定 really happen? What would it mean for your money? Are the OBR's 予測（する）s just more 事業／計画（する） 恐れる? Or is ignoring 専門家s 手段d 予測（する）s 事業／計画（する） Daft?

On this week's podcast Simon Lambert and Georgie 霜 dive into Britain's 予測できない short-称する，呼ぶ／期間／用語 未来.

Also on the show, we look at what we can learn from a trip 支援する to This is Money a １０年間 ago, consider why Lloyds is getting 支援する into the 投資 advice 商売／仕事 with Schroders Personal Wealth, and answer a couple of reader questions on 偽のing a break-up and 行う／開催する／段階ing a 離婚 to dodge 年金 税金 and whether if you break off an 約束／交戦 you get to keep the （犯罪の）一味.

Who said love is dead?

取引，協定 or £30billion no 取引，協定?

?