Should 投資家s, entrepreneurs and buy-to-letters 支払う／賃金 more 税金 on 利益（をあげる）s? This is Money podcast

• e-mail

Entrepreneurs and 投資家s 支払う／賃金 いっそう少なく 税金 on their 利益（をあげる）s to 反映する the 危険 they take.

That’s the 原則 that lies behind 資本／首都 伸び（る）s 税金 存在 lower than the 率s 告発（する），告訴（する）／料金d on 雇用 income.

But the 影響力のある think-戦車／タンク, the 学校／設ける for Public 政策 研究, wants to 引き裂く up that system and 告発（する），告訴（する）／料金 the same 率 on 伸び（る）s from selling 株 or 所有物／資産／財産 as 所得税 ? and 切り開く／タクシー／不正アクセス 支援する the 年次の 資本／首都 伸び（る）s 税金 allowance to just £1,000.

Should we 支払う／賃金 the same 税金 率 on 所有物／資産／財産 as 所得税??

It even wants to 除去する the special low entrepreneur 率 given to those who have sold a 商売／仕事 that they built up.

Is this the 肉親，親類d of For the many not the few move that Britain needs to level the playing field between those with plenty of 資本／首都 and the ability to make 投資s and those who don’t?

Or is it just another planned 税金 （警察の）手入れ，急襲 on thos e putting their money to 生産力のある use and growing our 集団の／共同の wealth?

On this week’s podcast, Simon Lambert and Georgie 霜 dig into the IPPR’s 提案s and look at whether this is the 肉親，親類d of thing that could become 労働 party 政策?

They also look at long-称する，呼ぶ／期間／用語 投資s that have paid off, risky 投資s to be 用心深い of and the one thing plenty of people are happy to 沈む thousands of 続けざまに猛撃するs into knowing that they will lose a big chunk of their money ? a brand new car.

The good news is that 予定 to a perfect 嵐／襲撃する of a 最終期限 on new 規則 and 衝突，墜落ing sales, there are some astonishing 取引，協定s on pre-登録（する）d ‘new’ cars with as much as 40% off. The bad news is that you’ll still almost certainly lose money.

?

?