Were the social care 税金 引き上げ（る） and the ３倍になる lock 選ぶ the 権利 moves? This is Money podcast on manifesto-破産した／（警察が）手入れするing

• e-mail

If you’re going to break one manifesto 約束, then why not break two?

Why not distract from telling pensioners they can’t have their 可能性のある 8.8 per cent ３倍になる lock 明言する／公表する 年金 rise by 引き上げ（る）ing 税金s for everyone.

That appeared to be the theory this week, as two 誓約（する）s to not raise 税金s and keep the ３倍になる lock went out the window.

Boris Johnson has been bold enough to be the 総理大臣 who finally tries to 直す／買収する，八百長をする Britain’s social care problems, with a 1.25 per cent 国家の 保険 rise and then new 税金 to 支払う／賃金 for this and getting the NHS to play catch-up after the pandemic.

Coupled with a corresponding 1.25 per cent NI rise for 雇用者s, this 量s to a 2.5 per cent 攻撃する，衝突する to people’s 支払う／賃金.

Will that be enough to sort the problem, does the cash 危険 just 存在 swallowed up by the NHS, and are our social care problems just about 基金ing?

Along with those questions, why was the ３倍になる lock turned 二塁打 for a year, was this a の近くに shave for its 存在 and could there have been a better way of 取引，協定ing with wildly skewed 行う growth 人物／姿／数字s?

On this week’s podcast, Tanya Jefferies, Georgie 霜 and Simon Lambert 取り組む those questions and more on the ３倍になる lock and social care.

加える, Tanya explains how she 暴露するd major 延期するs for people who are starting to get their 明言する／公表する 年金 and what the 政府 計画（する）s to do about it.

Also on this week’s show, what to do when a 株 you 持つ／拘留する takes a 宙返り／暴落する ? and how to when to 持つ／拘留する ‘em and when to 倍の ‘em.

And finally, why the AA says people’s 範囲 苦悩 over electric cars is massively overcooked. 手がかり（を与える） that’s not why most break 負かす／撃墜する.