このページは大阪弁化フィルタによって翻訳生成されたんですわ。 |
> /* Sorry there'll be a lot of RTFM here, people with weak neural systems > should quit */ I've got quite solid neural system. so.. > > Where should I post bugreports > RTFM DOCS/BUGREPORTS line 10 I did read DOCS/BUGREPORTS. If you have read my mail that you would notice that it's a bugreport on current bugreport system. > > so that I would know about what happens > Every bugreport is read, and (if not just a simple RTFM;) answered. Well, what about my bugreport about DOCS/DEBIAN documentation? > > someone's working on it, marked as known and left for feature > DOCS/BUGS DOCS/TODO Not ergonomic way of communication. also - I've got not DOCS/BUGS DOCS/TODO file in my quite fresh cvs copy, also - it requires everyone to download latest CVS to check what's the current status, and not everyone uses cvs or even have access to such soft. And that's not what cvs is for. And there is now way to acces this file via say http. > > Maybe using some bugtracking system would be nice? > Dunno, but methinks not. Based on...? > > k6 as k5 - ( pmodel=`cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep "model$TAB" seems to fail ). > RTFM DOCS/BUGREPORTS line 19 ... we need your /proc/cpuinfo, not? That's what I'm offering. > > So where should I send those corrections? > Already answered above Not really. > > When I send something to mplayer-users it gets randomly ignored > Never. Sometimes. That's why I'm proposing using some ticketing system, sourceforge offers such functionality. That way anyone knows IF their report was lost in transport or maybe reached it's destination but got marked as RTFM. best regards -- Dariusz Pietrzak Certified Nobody _______________________________________________ Mplayer-users mailing list Mplayer-users at lists.sourceforge.net http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mplayer-users