Killing bad products is essential to the health of a product line. “Bad” might mean defective, poor fit, or even merely unpopular.
So I’m happy that Creative Commons is retiring two little used licenses.
153ofsZ1PrnCnDGjvWAenRJc53TRhR9BzK
Posted
2007-06-04,
filed under Creative Commons.
The retirement of the sharing license is a good thing. I’m not sure it added anything to the puzzle in the first instance, but the jigsaw certainly assembles just as well without this particular jagged piece.
Only a few more duds to go until only CC-SA is left and ‘Creative Commons’ means ‘creative commons’. :)
Essential of life is to make every one happy
gudronark,
That’s the sampling license, but yeah, if you’re making a reference to a text puzzle-piece license chooser, the share piece is now superfluous — it cannot be removed.
alpesh,
I’m afraid your comment is antithetical to this post. Think about it. :)
Hmm. I managed to spell my own handle wrong, and mis-identify the
license type, but apart from those obvious typos, I still agree with you that it’s progress to dispense with those licenses.
A few more things just got added to the good stack of retirees :)
[…] happy to report again that Creative Commons is retiring two little used licenses, with a fairly thorough explanation of […]