
Formed in 2009, the Archive Team (not to be confused with the archive.org Archive-It Team) is a rogue archivist collective dedicated to saving copies of rapidly dying or deleted websites for the sake of history and digital heritage. The group is 100% composed of volunteers and interested parties, and has expanded into a large amount of related projects for saving online and digital history.
History is littered with hundreds of conflicts over the future of a community, group, location or business that were "resolved" when one of the parties stepped ahead and destroyed what was there. With the original point of contention destroyed, the debates would fall to the wayside. Archive Team believes that by duplicated condemned data, the conversation and debate can continue, as well as the richness and insight gained by keeping the materials. Our projects have ranged in size from a single volunteer downloading the data to a small-but-critical site, to over 100 volunteers stepping forward to acquire terabytes of user-created data to save for future generations.
The main site for Archive Team is at archiveteam.org and contains up to the date information on various projects, manifestos, plans and walkthroughs.
This collection contains the output of many Archive Team projects, both ongoing and completed. Thanks to the generous providing of disk space by the Internet Archive, multi-terabyte datasets can be made available, as well as in use by the Wayback Machine, providing a path back to lost websites and work.
Our collection has grown to the point of having sub-collections for the type of data we acquire. If you are seeking to browse the contents of these collections, the Wayback Machine is the best first stop. Otherwise, you are free to dig into the stacks to see what you may find.
The Archive Team Panic Downloads are full pulldowns of currently extant websites, meant to serve as emergency backups for needed sites that are in danger of closing, or which will be missed dearly if suddenly lost due to hard drive crashes or server failures.
I am down the idea, but not sure if the EU should be the catalyst, since it also harbors all the Anglo-centric imperialist states that divided the world up.
Instead, let’s amend the constitution to allow individual states in the US to join super-states! Then California and New York could just buy off the rest of the states, meet in the middle and call it a day.
That is only half snark.
You’re mostly right except for “Anglo-centric” — the British empire was the largest, but France, Spain, Portugal, the Netherlands, Belgium, Germany, Italy, and Sweden all had non-European empires. Russia is an imperialist state (with lots of parallels to the US mostly continental empire) that isn’t Anglo or in the EU, though it ought be. Of course that leaves China, never completely divided up by the aforementioned, but the oldest imperial state in many ways. It should join, too.
All of the later ex-European colonies repeated the mistake of the US, demanding independence rather than equal representation, allowing the former empires to escape their responsibilities and hide behind the wall of international Apartheid.
I’d be happy to see other arrangements toward the demise of the nation-state as top prestige and object of power struggle. Shifting of boundaries should be institutionalized, much as democracy institutionalized regime change and took out of the bounds of violent revolution. US states joining EU could be one path.
Do keep in mind that such broadenings usually tend to come with a *loss* of democracy (which EU people are only now beginning to realize, just ask the Greeks). If (and when) such process has to take place, my guess is that these entities will actually be privately-held, and most probably take the form of transnational corporations superseeding national or regional governments (as the TAFTA/TTIP treaty already maps out), far removed from any actual democratic accountability. In other words, careful what you wish for.
Well, ya learn something new every day. I meant Anglo to include most of those countries. I believe the way I learned the word it was implied to mean “white European with English/Germanic based language”. It appears that it can mean different things to different parts of the US, and in th South, where I learned it, I always thought it meant non-Black, because I learned it from racist fuckheads.
I do like the idea, as well as some of the radical ideas proposed in comments.
I can’t find the title of the book, as it is kinda generic at this point, but when I was a kid, pre-teen, I found a large tome that explained the British Empire. It opened with that quote about the sun never setting, and I attribute a lot of my early distrust in government to that book. Your proposal solicits a similar gut reaction, because I wonder if the current super-inter-state status of the world is held in place to keep humans from doing something truly horrible. With one super-state we could get space travel, equal access to medication and knowledge, and the extermination of entire ethnic groups with the whole of the world’s resources behind it.
We need some speculative fiction for this! Suggestions are welcome. ^_^
Better to join the EU than the Caliphate!
vvillenave, be careful what you don’t wish for. Better global coordination is a survival issue, whether the biggest threat is war (I think so, unquestionably), climate change, plague, non-state terrorism, etc. I think this requires suppressing “national” interest, which is absolutely the worst level of concern for democracy anyway, however attached we are to it. Of course it will be a struggle to achieve more democracy locally and globally, but cutting out the dangerous and misleading nation-state is necessary.
maiki, speaking of the US South, one good thing about it is it has provoked a healthy distaste for absolute local (or would-be national) majoritarian rule in the US. One cultural thing I have zero read on is whether WWII provoked any similar distaste among Europeans.
andy, no kidding. But if the Caliphate survives, it should be redirected to joining the super-EU too, right along with Israel. By my calculation the US, UK, and France, for past occupations, already owe the relevant populations citizenship, and should grant it on demand, pronto.
The whole purpose of the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Convention_on_Human_Rights is to prevent members of the Council of Europe from doing horrible things to e.g. minorities, so it is limiting local sovereignty and majoritarian rule.