AAP 雇うs tainted doctors: Delhi 政府 指名するs medics （刑事）被告 of 怠慢，過失 and 性の いやがらせ?as city's health 監視者s
It seems the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) 政府 doesn’t practice what it preaches. The party, やめる 声の about its self-professed honesty and 誠実 に向かって Delhiites, has failed to 証明する itself on the ground.?
In its 最新の 決定／判定勝ち（する）, the AAP 政府 has 指名するd two tainted doctors as health care 監視者s to keep an 注目する，もくろむ on quacks and 事例／患者s of 医療の 怠慢，過失.?
Of the four doctors 指名するd to the 23-member Delhi 医療の 会議 (DMC), two are 直面するing 告発（する），告訴（する）／料金s of 医療の 怠慢，過失.?
The 会議 ― a regulatory 団体／死体 for 登録（する）d doctors and 医療の education in the 明言する／公表する ― has been dysfunctional in the absence of its members for the past two months.
The 指名するd members are Dr Atul Kumar Gupta, Dr Arun Kumar Gupta, Dr Chander Prakash and Dr Yogesh Kumar Sarin.?
But it seems the 政府 didn’t show 予定 diligence before 指名するing Dr Prakash and Dr Sarin to the 会議. ?
Mail Today had on March 6 報告（する）／憶測d on the 医療の 団体／死体 lying idle in the absence of any 批准 from the Delhi 政府. Its 称する，呼ぶ／期間／用語 had 満了する／死ぬd in December 2014.?
Dr Prakash, a director in Sunder Lal Jain Hospital, was 逮捕（する）d by the police on July 13, 2001, in 関係 with the death of an 事故 犠牲者, 30-year-old Shamshad Ali of Azadpur.?
Ali, who had met with the 事故 on May 16 that year, died after he 恐らく didn’t receive proper 医療の 援助（する） at Sunder Lal Jain Hospital.?
As per the 事例／患者, Dr Prakash had 需要・要求するd a deposit of Rs 25,000 from Ali, and when he couldn’t arrange the 量, 辞退するd him admission.?The 負傷させるd man was later 転換d to Sushrut 外傷／ショック Centre, where he died the same day.?
The 外傷／ショック centre doctors opined that Ali could have been saved through a minor 操作／手術 if he had received timely 医療の care.?
On May 6 last year, the 最高裁判所 had 辞退するd to quash the 告発（する），告訴（する）／料金s again st the doctor and ordered that a 告発（する），告訴（する）／料金-sheet be とじ込み／提出するd under the 準備／条項s of the Indian Penal Code.?
“It will, however, be open for the 裁判，公判 法廷，裁判所 to でっちあげる，人を罪に陥れる 告発（する），告訴（する）／料金s under Section 304 of the Indian Penal Code based on the 構成要素 利用できる before it,” the apex 法廷，裁判所’s order 明言する／公表するd.?
Under Section 304-A, whoever 原因（となる）s the death of any person by a 無分別な or negligent 行為／法令／行動する not 量ing to culpable 殺人, shall be punished with 監禁，拘置 up to two years, or with 罰金, or both.?
“How can a doctor who himself is 調書をとる／予約するd for 医療の 怠慢，過失 be 任命するd by the 政府 to 監視する the 事例／患者s of 医療の 怠慢，過失?” a 上級の health 公式の／役人 wondered.?
類似して, Dr Sarin, the 長，率いる of department of paediatric 外科 at Lok Nayak Jaya Prakash Narayan Hospital, had 直面するd the 告発（する），告訴（する）／料金 of 医療の 怠慢，過失 by Ravindra Nath Dubey, who 申し立てられた／疑わしい that Dr Sarin wrongly operated in 2005 on his two-and-a-half-year-old son.?
Dubey, who is an 自動車-rickshaw driver, had approached then 長，指導者 大臣 Sheila Dikshit regarding the 事例／患者. The family is still を待つing 司法（官） while their son を受けるs 治療 at the All India 学校／設ける of 医療の Sciences (AIIMS).?
“Dr Sarin 除去するd one of my son’s 腎臓s, which was not even 要求するd. A total of eight 外科s were 成し遂げるd on my son in just a little over two years. I will spend all my 貯金 but fight for my son,” Dubey told Mail Today.?
Sources at the hospital told Mail Today that a スタッフの一員 had recently とじ込み／提出するd a （民事の）告訴 of 性の いやがらせ against Dr Sarin.?
“Though nothing has been 設立するd as yet, we are 調査／捜査するing the 事柄,” a hospital 公式の／役人 said.?
Dr Sarin told Mail Today: “These 主張s are 完全に baseless. I don’t even know in what 状況 you are 説 this. The 患者 has 悩ますd me everywhere. He has tried to reach out to every 大臣 but nothing has been 設立するd against me.”?
Speaking about the 論争, Health 大臣 Satyendra Jain told Mail Today: “I wasn’t aware of the 最新の order by the 最高裁判所. The 事柄 is still sub judice… So all I can say is that so far no 告発（する），告訴（する）／料金s have been でっちあげる，人を罪に陥れるd against Dr Prakash by the apex 法廷，裁判所.”?
Regarding the 事例／患者 against Dr Sarin, the 大臣 said he was “not aware” of any such 事例／患者 against him.?
The Delhi High 法廷，裁判所 on March 20 stayed the 政府’s notification regarding the 任命 of new members to the 会議. The next 審理，公聴会 is on April 21 and the old 会議 can’t be 解散するd until the 法廷，裁判所 reaches a 決定／判定勝ち（する）.?
“Once a member is elected or 指名するd to the 会議, he can be 除去するd only if he attracts disqualification and disability under the 準備／条項s of the 医療の 会議 行為／法令／行動する,” one of the DMC members told Mail Today.
