PIERS MORGAN: A three-match 禁止(する) for this? Now that's ugly

Here's a tricky question for you to digest over the morning cornflakes. What is the worse 罪,犯罪 - snorting a few lines of コカイン or kicking a man hard, and やめる deliberately, in the 長,率いる?

On balance, I'd probably veer に向かって the latter.

The first offence, after all, is a selftitillating, self-害(を与える)ing, rather pitiful pastime that turns you all 'Kate Mossy' - sweating, scowling, swearin g, self-obsessed and oh soooooooooooo boring.

Scroll 負かす/撃墜する for more

Robin Van Persie kicked in the head by Adebayor

'No 事故': The moment at Manchester City last week when Emmanuel Adebayor kicked former 兵器庫 チーム仲間 コマドリ 先頭 Persie in the 直面する

But the only real 犠牲者 is usually the one taking the stuff, if you 割引 the poor Colombian paupers coerced into making it.

With the second offence, the 犠牲者 is the person on the receiving end. And the consequences can be 致命的な. People die all over the world every week from savage kicks to the 長,率いる. In 妨げる/法廷,弁護士業 brawls, nightclub fights, violent 遭遇(する)s on buses, trains and in the street. Others are left maimed, blinded, or with broken jaws and cheekbones.

The 犯人s, if they're caught, get 告発(する),告訴(する)/料金d with GBH or ABH and often receive 非常に長い 刑務所,拘置所 宣告,判決s.

But for some bizarre 推論する/理由, if you do it on a football field, wearing boots, you get away 事実上 scot-解放する/自由な.

Emmanuel Adebayor, for instance, has just received a three-match 禁止(する) for kicking コマドリ 先頭 Persie. I'll ignore the second part of his misdemeanour - absurd and classless though his demented, pitch-length 告発(する),告訴(する)/料金 to the 兵器庫 支持者s was last week. The only real shock to me was how 急速な/放蕩な he ran.

The moaning, gangly toerag never reached even half that 速度(を上げる) during his sulking, lacklustre, preening, AC Milan-flirting 業績/成果s for us last season.

No, I'd rather 焦点(を合わせる) on the more serious part of the 告発(する),告訴(する)/料金.

That kick wasn't an 事故. He looked 負かす/撃墜する, saw 先頭 Persie's 長,率いる and kicked him hard in the 直面する.

Yet he got the same 罰 that you get for running up a few bookings.

一方/合間, former Chelsea striker Adrian Mutu continues to 直面する possible 財政上の and career 廃虚 for taking 違法な 麻薬s while playing at the club.

You probably can't remember much about what 現実に happened at the time, so let me remind you.

In September, 2004, five year s ago, Mutu 実験(する)d 肯定的な for コカイン.

Adebayor kicks Robin van Persie in the head

位置/汚点/見つけ出す the ball: The moment of 衝撃

The 罰 was instant and 厳しい - a seven-month 禁止(する) and a £20,000 罰金. And, a month later, the 解雇(する) from Chelsea.

You might think that was a 都合よく 壊滅的な ending to his time at Stamford 橋(渡しをする) but that was just the start of his hell.

Chelsea 告訴するd the Romanian player for the loss of his £16million 移転 value. FIFA ordered him to 支払う/賃金 £9.6m, he 控訴,上告d to the 法廷,裁判所 of 仲裁 for Sport, lost, and has now been told to 支払う/賃金 £14.65m. This is the biggest 罰金 ever 徴収するd by FIFA.

And it makes the hapless Mutu 明らかに the biggest 犯罪の in the history of football.

The 罰金 would be paid, of course, to one of the world's richest clubs, with a multi-億万長者 ロシアの oligarch owner who spends that 肉親,親類d of cash on a spare 潜水艦 for one of his four 最高の-ヨットs.

Mutu, now at Fiorentina, can't afford to 支払う/賃金 it, 明白に, and has made a 一連の ますます desperate 嘆願s for 温和/情状酌量. 非,不,無 of which has so far worked.

Now to my point.

I don't 容赦する what Mutu did. He was stupid to take コカイン and will 悔いる if for the 残り/休憩(する) of his life. But it can hardly be considered 業績/成果-高めるing.

The aforementioned Kate Moss struggles to even walk, let alone talk, when she's 攻撃する,衝突する the marching powde r of an evening, as we saw from the 最近の GQ awards.

By contrast, Adebayor's vicious premeditated 強襲,強姦 on 先頭 Persie could have 原因(となる)d him very serious 傷害.

Yet in 交流 for his high velocity, 猛烈に dangerous boot, he's getting a teeny 非難する on the knuckles, the merest suggestion of a 非難する on the wrist.

I'm all for the football 当局 stamping 負かす/撃墜する on illicit 麻薬s.

They have no place in sport, whatever type they are.

But is it really fair that a silly party boy like Adrian Mutu is 存在 追跡(する)d into professional and personal oblivion, while a narcisstic, whining 凶漢 like Emmanuel Adebayor 行方不明になるs just three matches?

特に when, in the real world, Mutu would get a 罰金 for his minor コカイン dabbling and Adebayor would probably get a 刑務所,拘置所 宣告,判決 for his Grievous Bodily 害(を与える) with 意図?

?

They should throw the 調書をとる/予約する at 最高の,を越す Gun poser Briatore

What the hell is going on in sport at the moment?

Just when I didn't think things could get any more repulsive than rugby players using 偽の 血 to cheat, along comes Flavio Briatore to drag the decency 妨げる/法廷,弁護士業 several leagues その上の downwards.

I've been struggling to comprehend the mindset of a man who orders a racing driver to 衝突,墜落 his car, and かもしれない kill himself in the 過程, just so he can cheat his team's way to victory.

Flavio Briatore

Show-off: Flavio Briatore and his 最高の,を越す Gun sunglasses< /p>

It's the 肉親,親類d of thing Hannibal Lecter would do, or Idi Amin. An 行為/法令/行動する of such grotesque monstrosity that it almost 反抗するs belief.

Briatore has always struck me as a 公正に/かなり awful character. Flash, brash, intellectually moribund and an inveterate, shameless show-off.

He chases models, buys ヨットs, wears ludicrously age-不適切な 最高の,を越す Gunstyle sunglasses and leather jackets and 一般に behaves like the worst 肉親,親類d of spoiled, lecherous old rou?.

I bumped into him once in a gym, and he 星/主役にするd at me for several seconds with a やめる stupendously sneering look.

I'm used to that 肉親,親類d of thing, 明白に. But few have done it with such faux imperious grandeur.

I've heard that he does this to a lot of people. Briatore may think he's better than the 残り/休憩(する) of us.

But he's not.

He's turned out to be worse than the worst-ever cheats in the history of sport.

Someone who was 用意が出来ている for his driver, Nelson Piquet Jnr, to 危険 his life in a duplicitous 試みる/企てる to 反対/詐欺 a 勝利,勝つ.

His 辞職, にもかかわらず some pathetic bluster about wanting to 'save the team', was a tacit admission of 犯罪.

So a police 調査 is 必須の and 告発(する),告訴(する)/料金s should follow. And, if 設立する 有罪の in a 法廷,裁判所 of 法律, then Briatore must be punished so 厳しく that nobody ever even thinks of doing what he did again.

?

P.S: AMID all the sleaze and 暴力/激しさ, there was one moment of 驚くべき/特命の/臨時の 冒険的な genius last week that 解除するd the spirits - Roger Federer's under-the-脚s 発射 in the US Open.

For sheer outrageous audacity and technically brilliant 死刑執行, itwas the most 素晴らしい thing I've seen since Kevin Pietersen 逆転する-swept Muttiah Muralitharan for six.

Federer is like a 瓶/封じ込める of Chateau Latour 1961. As he gets older he gets more 精製するd, sumptuous, bold and magnificent and you start to sense that he'll be the greatest of them all.

?

NOW HAVE YOUR SAY

Are you ever going to stop banging on about David Beckham? I am heartily fed up with it. Beckham has never relied on 速度(を上げる), only on an ability to read a game and 遂行する/発効させる exquisite pin-point corners, 解放する/自由な-kicks and passes. What more can you ask of a footballer? You are jealous because he is fitter, more handsome and earned more money than you. DOREEN ROBSHAW

Piers says: 'Maybe, but he'll never be as tall, intelligent or modest as me.'

全く agree with you about Beckham. He's a one-trick pony with no pace. And, as you point out, the マスコミ circus would be unbearable and a distraction to the other members of the squad. Bring on Walcott and Lennon. DEREK HUTLEY

Piers says: 'We won't 勝利,勝つ the World Cup with carthorses, 十分な stop.'

If a 世界的な 投票 asked: 'Who do you think knows more about football - Gary Lineker or Piers Morgan?'- what do you think the answer would be? 存在 a green-注目する,もくろむd, petulant, opinionated plonker about Beckham does you no credit. PAM BLACKSHAW

Piers says: 'I've got blue 注目する,もくろむs, 現実に.'

What were you 説 about this 'aura-いっそう少なく'Australian team? 0-7 . . . Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha. BRIAN SMITH

Piers says: 'We won the Ashes, you won a knockabout one-day 競争 against our reserves. Even an Australian should be able to do the maths on that one.'

E-mail your comments to me at: piers.morgan@mailonsunday.co.uk


The comments below have been 穏健なd in 前進する.

The 見解(をとる)s 表明するd in the contents above are those of our 使用者s and do not やむを得ず 反映する the 見解(をとる)s of MailOnline.

We are no longer 受託するing comments on this article.