Fabian Schar's challenge on Marcos Alonso was 正確に given as a 刑罰，罰則 but Etienne Capoue should have been sent off for Watford

• e-mail

On first 見解（をとる）ing I thought Fabian Schar's challenge on Marcos Alonso was a 刑罰，罰則 but, after watching a replay, the Newcastle defender does get a touch on the ball.

Does this mean it is not a 刑罰，罰則? No, there is a difference between getting a touch and dispossessing a player.

Schar uses a scissor 動議 to make the 取り組む and it is his second 脚 which is 有罪の of the foul, and it is a foul. So yes, I support the 決定／判定勝ち（する） of Paul Tierney, although I understand why it will 分裂（する） opinion.

This is one of those where even the use of VAR would not be 最終的な and would still lead to 審議.

As for Newcastle's goal, it should not have stood. DeAndre Yedlin 明確に uses his arm in the 直面する of Olivier Giroud and, for me, did so deliberately. This should have been spotted and a foul awarded before the cross is made for Joselu to 得点する／非難する／２０.?

Fabian Schar (権利) did make 接触する with the ball but also brought 負かす／撃墜する Marcos Alonso

The defender put his 手渡すs on his 長，率いる after giving away the 位置／汚点／見つけ出す kick in the second half

If 審判（をする） Anthony Taylor had use of VAR then I have no 疑問 he would have sent off Etienne Capoue.

It is a jump, not a 取り組む, and he comes 負かす／撃墜する on Wilfried Zaha’s Achilles with his studs - it is a red card because he has 危険d 原因（となる）ing 傷害 to his 対抗者.

In real time, Taylor has probably seen this as a stepping 活動／戦闘 and I understand why he has 問題／発行するd a yellow card.

But after seeing a replay I am sure he would have 昇格d to a red. Capoue will, of course, escape retrospective 活動／戦闘 now because Taylor saw the challenge and has dealt with it.?

Etienne Capoue was given a yelllow for his 取り組む on Wilfried Zaha but it should have been red

You can argue Willy Boly’s handball is not 審議する／熟考する, but it never feels 権利 that a player can use his arm or 手渡す to 得点する／非難する／２０ a goal, 特に as he changed the direction of the ball and 伸び（る）d an advantage by doing so.

It should have been a 解放する／自由な-kick to Manchester City. It is difficult, however, to attach 非難する to 審判（をする） ツバメ Atkinson. For starters, it looked like a perfectly good goal on first 見解（をとる）ing. He also has several players 封鎖するing his 見解（をとる） and must rely on his assistant to make the call.

The assistant, in his defence, is also checking for offside and it looks like Matt Doherty does make slight 接触する with the ball. It is a tight 決定／判定勝ち（する） as Benjamin Mendy’s foot could still be playing Boly onside, so the 利益 must go to the attacking team.

But the 重要な here is that a handball goal was 行方不明になるd and it is yet another example of the need for 科学（工学）技術 to 補助装置 the officiating team, because I think it was 近づく enough impossible for them to see this in real time.

Willy Boly 得点する／非難する／２０d for Wolves but replays showed he used his 手渡す to コースを変える it in