審判(をする) Andre Marriner let Swansea 負かす/撃墜する against Manchester City... but the 欠如(する) of VAR was 高くつく/犠牲の大きい

  • Andre Marriner should not have 許すd Manchester City's last two goals
  • VAR 存在 in 首相 League stadiums only has 損失d 正直さ of FA Cup
  • Raheem 英貨の/純銀の wasn't fouled for the 刑罰,罰則 and Sergio Aguero was offside?

The FA’s 決定/判定勝ち(する) not to get the Liberty Stadium ready for VAR probably cost Swansea a place in the FA Cup 半分-決勝戦.?

Manchester City’s second and third goals should not have stood. For the second, a 刑罰,罰則 awarded for a foul on Raheem 英貨の/純銀の, the defender 明確に got a touch on the ball.?

Then Sergio Aguero was offside for his winning goal. VAR should not have been needed to get those 決定/判定勝ち(する)s 権利.

Manchester City's Sergio Aguero was offside when he scored the winning goal at Swansea

Manchester City's Sergio Aguero was offside when he 得点する/非難する/20d the winning goal at Swansea

Referee Andre Marriner should have seen Raheem Sterling was not fouled for the penalty call

審判(をする) Andre Marriner should have seen Raheem 英貨の/純銀の was not fouled for the 刑罰,罰則 call

Andre Marriner should have seen 英貨の/純銀の was not fouled, and for the offside, the assistant 審判(をする) should have been in line with the second-last defender.?


The 正直さ of the FA Cup has been 損失d by the use of VAR in 首相 League stadiums only.?

For the 4半期/4分の1-決勝戦, the FA should have got Swansea and Millwall 認可するd for use of VAR.?

There was enough time, because the draw?was on February 18.

The officials could not call on the help of VAR during the FA Cup quarter-final at the Liberty

The 公式の/役人s could not call on the help of VAR during the FA Cup 4半期/4分の1-final at the Liberty

The comments below have not been 穏健なd.

The 見解(をとる)s 表明するd in the contents above are those of our 使用者s and do not やむを得ず 反映する the 見解(をとる)s of MailOnline.

We are no longer 受託するing comments on this article.