Anti-麻薬ing boss 調査(する)s '怪しげな red' 麻薬 名簿(に載せる)/表(にあげる) that 指名するs 最高の,を越す UK 星/主役にする: British 陸上競技 icon の中で 65 競技者s under 調査 over 異常な 血 readings

  • 刑事 続けざまに猛撃する is a?a former chairman of the World Anti-麻薬ing 機関
  • Said he has been asked to lead 調査 into 主張 of 麻薬ing cover up
  • 65 競技者s had 血 readings which should have led to 実験(する) for EPO
  • Banned 麻薬 高めるs 業績/成果 by helping to get oxygen to muscles

One of Britain’s most famous 競技者s was drawn into an 調査 on Saturday night after it was (人命などを)奪う,主張するd that the sport’s 治める/統治するing 団体/死体 failed to 行為/法令/行動する upon ‘怪しげな’ 麻薬s 実験(する) 見本s.

刑事 続けざまに猛撃する, a former chairman of the World Anti-麻薬ing 機関 (WADA), told the Mail on Sunday he had been asked to lead an 調査 into 主張s that hundreds of 異常な readings could 示す 麻薬ing was covered up.

In a スキャンダル now (海,煙などが)飲み込むing the International 協会 of 運動競技のs 連合s (IAAF), 225 競技者s from 39 countries were 明らかにする/漏らすd to have produced anomalous 血 readings.?They 含む three British 競技者s ? one of whom is a 世帯 指名する and a 星/主役にする of 陸上競技 events.?

Dick Pound, a former chairman of the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA), said he had been asked to lead an inquiry into allegations that hundreds of abnormal readings could indicate doping was covered up

刑事 Po und, a former chairman of the World Anti-麻薬ing 機関 (WADA), said he had been asked to lead an 調査 into 主張s that hundreds of 異常な readings could 示す 麻薬ing was covered up

The 星/主役にする’s 指名する appears on a 漏れるd 名簿(に載せる)/表(にあげる) of 65 競技者s whose 実験(する)s 得点する/非難する/20s were labelled ‘疑惑 Red’ ? which 専門家s say should have 誘発する/引き起こすd an (a)自動的な/(n)自動拳銃 check for the banned 麻薬 EPO. The 麻薬 helps 配達する oxygen to muscles by 刺激するing the 生産/産物 of red 血 独房s.


But まっただ中に 開始するing 関心s that the IAAF did not 行為/行う follow-up 実験(する)s on most or all of the sportsmen and women, Mr 続けざまに猛撃する ? one of the sport’s most 上級の 人物/姿/数字s ? has been approached to 設立する what happened to the results.?

He said: ‘What I understood… was that a 広大な/多数の/重要な number of 事例/患者s (機の)カム 支援する and were short of something that could be 宣言するd 肯定的な, but whoever had done the 分析 明確に thought that there was something 進行中で.’

The British 星/主役にする has so far 拒絶する/低下するd to comment, yet the スキャンダル has already (人命などを)奪う,主張するd several high-最高位の (n)役員/(a)執行力のあるs and shows little 調印する of abating.

The ‘疑惑 Red’ 名簿(に載せる)/表(にあげる) is の中で a (武器などの)隠匿場所 of 文書s sourced by The Mail on Sunday and said to have come from a whistleblower at the IAAF’s 医療の (売買)手数料,委託(する)/委員会/権限. Although undated, the 名簿(に載せる)/表(にあげる) is said to have been 収集するd between 2006 and 2008 before the introduction into 運動競技のs of much 厳格な人 実験(する)s for banned 実体s.

It has been argued that it is ありそうもない any readings taken during this period could be used to 調査/捜査する 競技者s retrospectively, but Mr 続けざまに猛撃する said it may be possible to 暴露する past 違反s of cheating if these readings are used in 合同 with frozen 見本s.

While 存在 指名するd on the 名簿(に載せる)/表(にあげる) does not 供給する conclusive 証拠 that the British 星/主役にする was taking banned 実体s, 専門家s have said it raises serious questions about whether proper checks were made.

どこかよそで in the 文書s are more 詳細(に述べる)d 名簿(に載せる)/表(にあげる)s which do not について言及する the British 競技者, but do 示唆する that World and Olympic 支持する/優勝者s showed 異常な 血 values that 堅固に 示唆する the use of 業績/成果-高めるing 麻薬s.

These more 詳細(に述べる)d 文書s relate to 実験(する)s taken between 2001 and 2006. The two other Britons 指名するd are いっそう少なく high-profile, and the level of 疑惑 is lower and coded ‘orange.’

The IAAF does not 論争 the authenticity of the (警察などへの)密告,告訴(状), which was first 得るd by the German television 駅/配置する ARD-WDR and broadcast in a 文書の last month, without 明らかにする/漏らすing any 指名するs, but it says it may not 証明する the 星/主役にするs had been cheating and 示唆するd other factors might have produced high 実験(する) results.

However, on Saturday night the former 長,率いる of Jamaica’s anti-麻薬ing (売買)手数料,委託(する)/委員会/権限 述べるd the IAAF’s 返答 to the スキャンダル as ‘完全に unsatisfactory’ and 示唆するd there was more to the 名簿(に載せる)/表(にあげる) ‘than we are 存在 told’.

The British star has so far declined to comment, yet the scandal has already claimed several high-ranking executives and shows little sign of abating

The British 星/主役にする has so far 拒絶する/低下するd to comment, yet the スキャンダル has already (人命などを)奪う,主張するd several high-最高位の (n)役員/(a)執行力のあるs and shows little 調印する of abating

Renee Anne Shirley, a 尊敬(する)・点d 選挙運動者 for transparency in sport, 追加するd that the 存在 of the ‘red’ 名簿(に載せる)/表(にあげる) ‘raises serious 関心s about what happened next’.

She said: ‘That is the real 問題/発行する here. 存在 on such a 名簿(に載せる)/表(にあげる) in the first place is in itself indicative that something 不規律な has been flagged up.

‘Did the IAAF 的 実験(する) the people on this 名簿(に載せる)/表(にあげる), as I would 推定する/予想する should have been the 事例/患者, or not? And if not, why not?

‘I think there is more to this 名簿(に載せる)/表(にあげる) than we have been told and the IAAF’s 返答 so far is 完全に unsatisfactory. What did they find when they did その上の 調査? Did they in fact do anything?

‘With everything going on and so much 不確定, it is 簡単に unsatisfactory to say there is no problem and 推定する/予想する people to 受託する that blindly.’

Many of the 指名するs lis ted in the 文書s are …を伴ってd by 詳細(に述べる)d readings of their 血 values, with 人物/姿/数字s appearing under さまざまな headings. For instance, one is ‘hgb’ ? haemoglobin, which 輸送(する)s oxygen in the 血.

The 文書s also 記録,記録的な/記録する the 高度 level ? which can 影響する/感情 red 血 独房 count ? at which the 実験(する)s took place. Together, the results produce an 全体にわたる 人物/姿/数字 known as the ‘off 得点する/非難する/20’ level and anything over 125 is considered to be a marker of 可能性のある 麻薬ing.

The 文書s show that the highest ‘off 得点する/非難する/20’ level for a male 競技者 was 167.63 ? considered to be extraordinarily high ? yet there is no 記録,記録的な/記録する that he was 告発(する),告訴(する)/料金d with a 麻薬ing offence.

The highest ‘off 得点する/非難する/20’ level for a 女性(の) 競技者 is 170.03 and again there is no public 記録,記録的な/記録する of the 競技者 存在 告発(する),告訴(する)/料金d.

More than a 4半期/4分の1 of the 競技者s 指名するd in 文書s are ロシアの, lending credence to (人命などを)奪う,主張するs that Moscow operated an ‘East German-style’ 麻薬ing 政権. There is also a high number of Kenyans on the 名簿(に載せる)/表(にあげる)s.?

The IAAF has (人命などを)奪う,主張するd that it did follow up ‘怪しげな’ readings of 血 levels and exonerated many of the 指名するs. It 強調d the 外見 of a 指名する on a 名簿(に載せる)/表(にあげる) 場内取引員/株価 疑惑 did not 示す that a 麻薬ing offence had taken place.

IAAF general 長官 Nick Davies has 主張するd that the mere presence of a 怪しげな value does not 示す a 肯定的な 実験(する), and that the (警察などへの)密告,告訴(状) 供給するd by the 文書s ‘was 部分的な/不平等な and 誤って導くing.’?

Mr Pound said WADA's inquiry has 'resulted from pretty extensive publication of materials that look pretty serious'

Mr 続けざまに猛撃する said WADA's 調査 has 'resulted from pretty 広範囲にわたる 出版(物) of 構成要素s that look pretty serious'

He has also said in a 声明 that: ‘競技者s with a “red 旗” reading may 井戸/弁護士席 be 有罪の of 麻薬ing but 平等に ? and we can 証明する it in the 広大な 大多数 of 事例/患者s ? they may be innocent, which is why this (警察などへの)密告,告訴(状) should have stayed locked up in a 安全な.’

On Saturday night, he told The Mail on Sunday in an email: ‘We welcome the 介入 of WADA. In all our 声明s we have を強調するd that we will co-operate 全く with WADA.’

Asked whether he believed the IAAF had followed up 怪しげな 血 readings, he replied: ‘Yes ? but let WADA do their work now.’

Mr 続けざまに猛撃する will 設立する the 条件 of 言及/関連 for the WADA 調査 before deciding whether to 受託する the 招待 to lead it.

He said: ‘WADA has a general monit 鉱石ing 責任/義務 with 尊敬(する)・点 to international 基準s and with 尊敬(する)・点 to the anti-麻薬ing code.

‘We are meant to do that and it’s part of our 委任統治(領). And this is a 明確な/細部 調査 that has resulted from pretty 広範囲にわたる 出版(物) of 構成要素s that look pretty serious.

‘I think our stakeholders, the IOC, the international 連合s and the public 当局, would 推定する/予想する us to do something and our chairman has 答える/応じるd by 説 yes indeed we agree and will 始める,決める up a (売買)手数料,委託(する)/委員会/権限 and give it the neces- sary 資源s to do whatever has to be done.’

There is already a separate IAAF 倫理学 (売買)手数料,委託(する)/委員会/権限 調査 into the 麻薬ing 名簿(に載せる)/表(にあげる)s.

Last week three 重要な IAAF 人物/姿/数字s ? treasurer Valetin Balaknichev, marketing 顧問 Massata Papa Diack, and 合法的な 助言者 Habib Cisse ? agreed to stand 負かす/撃墜する while 主張s against them were 調査/捜査するd by the 倫理学 委員会.

Sorry we are not 現在/一般に 受託するing comments on this article.