Website of the Week: www.redvisitor.com

率ing: 4 Star Rating

In the 影響力のある Travolution Awards last week, RedVisitor was 宣言するd best travel (警察などへの)密告,告訴(状) website.

It 目的(とする)s to 申し込む/申し出 reliable advice on the trendiest places to eat, sleep and play in popular cities around the world. 現在/一般に, 23 目的地s are featured, and the ニュース報道 is 増加するing 速く, with another dozen cities 予定 to appear on the website by the end of the year.

So, is RedVisitor as good as the Travolution 裁判官s think??

Sagrada Familia

City tips: RedVisitor has guides to 23 popular holiday 目的地s

Strengths

The best 面 of RedVisitor is its (疑いを)晴らす-削減(する) selectivity. Unlike guide 調書をとる/予約するs, you don't have to wade through reams of 推薦s to find the best hotels, restaurants and nightlife. For New York, I'm told what is the best hotel for design, the best cocktail 妨げる/法廷,弁護士業, the best 地元の food experience. For Rome, I'm looking at the city's 10 最高潮の場面s - not just sights, but a 地元のs' trattoria and a パン屋. For Venice, I'm 申し込む/申し出d a choice of just 13 hotels in total to choose from.

All the 推薦s - not just hotels and restaurants, but also 妨げる/法廷,弁護士業s and nightclubs - are given a 十分な, usually 井戸/弁護士席-written and helpful review, and often come with 質 photos.

For most 目的地s, you can watch a ビデオ of a 地元の 専門家 - perhaps a designer in Marrakesh, or a chef in Barcelona - talking about their city and its 最高潮の場面s. It draws you in to the place.

証拠不十分s

I want to know about the people who have written all the reviews. Do the authors live in the cities they 令状 about? Do they reall y know their stuff? 推定するing they do, if we were told something about them and their 専門的知識, then their 推薦s would carry much more 負わせる.

明確な/細部 prices are not given for anything.

(警察などへの)密告,告訴(状) on experiences can be skimpy. For example, for the campanile in Venice's Piazza San Marco, there's nothing on when it's open or 取り組むing the 列s, and there's no advice on how best to visit the Topkapi Palace in Istanbul.

Lastly, while much is made on everything 存在 bang up to date, not all the 推薦s are やめる as new as is 示唆するd. For example, the W South Beach is 選ぶd out as 存在 the best new hotel in Miami - but it 現実に opened 2 1/2 years ago.

Ratings

奮起させるing 4/5
Useful 3/5
平易な to use 4/5

率ing: 4 Star Rating
?

The comments below have not been 穏健なd.

The 見解(をとる)s 表明するd in the contents above are those of our 使用者s and do not やむを得ず 反映する the 見解(をとる)s of MailOnline.

We are no longer 受託するing comments on this article.