'Time should be up for her!': Piers Morgan SLAMS Kim Kardashian for her jaw-dropping topless photos as he tells new mother to 'put them away'

By Eve Buckland For Mailonline

Published: | Updated:

He 点火（する）d his 反目，不和 with Kim Kardashian in 2016 when he made a quip over her now 悪名高い nude mirror selfie.?

And Piers Morgan has slammed the curvaceous reality queen once again in the wake of her 最新の slew of jaw-dropping topless selfies, 説 'time should be up' for her during Tuesday's episode of Good Morning Britain.

The outspoken 新聞記者／雑誌記者, 52, who took to Twitter to tell Kim to 'put them away, for goodness sake' couldn't 含む／封じ込める his vitriol as he commented on the scantily 覆う？ images, 解放（する）d すぐに after his interview with US 大統領，／社長 Donald Trump 空気／公表するd.

Scroll 負かす／撃墜する for ビデオ?

Hitting back: At the end of January, Piers slammed Kim in the wake of her latest slew of jaw-dropping topless selfies, insisting 'time should be up' for her

Hitting 支援する: Piers Morgan has slammed Kim Kardashian once again in the wake of her 最新の slew of jaw-dropping topless selfies, 説 'time should be up' for her during Tuesday's episode of Good Morning Britain

Jaw-dropping:?The outspoken journalist, 52, who took to Twitter to tell Kim to 'put them away, for goodness sake' couldn't contain his vitriol as he commented on the scantily clad images

Jaw-dropping:?The outspoken 新聞記者／雑誌記者, 52, who took to Twitter to tell Kim to 'put them away, for goodness sake' couldn't 含む／封じ込める his vitriol as he commented on the scantily 覆う？ images, 解放（する）d すぐに after his interview with US 大統領，／社長 Donald Trump 空気／公表するd

Piers said: 'Very big news day yesterday 明白に for 推論する／理由s we all know. But 権利 in the middle of it, it was really glad to know that some things never change.

ひどく criticising 37-year-old Kim, who recently welcomed third child Chicago 経由で surrogate this month, said: 'When you become a mother again, things don’t change. You’ve become a mother again, you’re in your 中央の to late 30s, it's your third child.?

'I know what I'll do, I'll put a big topless photo of myself on social マスコミ.'

?'We’ve covered them up, she’s 基本的に got them and gone way look at me, me too.

Criticism:?Heavily criticising 37-year-old Kim, Piers said, 'When you become a mother again, things don’t change... You’re in your mid to late 30s, it's your third child'

'Things don't change':?ひどく criticising 37-year-old Kim, who recently welcomed third child Chicago 経由で surrogate this month, said: 'When you become a mother again, things don’t change. You’ve become a mother again, you’re in your 中央の to late 30s, it's your third child'

Fury: He said: 'I know what I'll do, I'll put a big topless photo of myself on social media.' 'We’ve covered them up, she’s basically got them and gone way look at me, me too'

Fury: He said: 'I know what I'll do, I'll put a big topless photo of myself on social マスコミ.' 'We’ve covered them up, she’s 基本的に got them and gone way look at me, me too'

Slammed: Piers also took to Twitter to comment on the racy snapshots shared by the star

Slammed: Piers also took to Twitter to comment on the half-naked snaps?

'Time should be up for 行方不明になる Kardashian. I don’t know what she 追加するs to the movement really.

'The only thing moving is her breasts. It's 安心させるing isn’t it that some things never change.'?

In March 2016 Piers and Kim became embroiled in a spat after he criticised her 完全に nude mirror selfie, 主要な the outspoken host to tweet: ‘I know the old man’s $50 million in 負債, Kim, but this is absurd. Want me to buy you some 着せる／賦与するs?’?

Kim was quick to 攻撃する，衝突する 支援する 令状ing: ‘Hey @PiersMorgan,’ she retorted, ‘never 申し込む／申し出 to buy a married woman 着せる／賦与するs. That’s on some Ashley Madison type s**t. #forres earch’.????

Vitriol: The star said:? 'Time should be up for Miss Kardashian. I don’t know what she adds to the movement really

Vitriol: The 星／主役にする said:? 'Time should be up for 行方不明になる Kardashian. I don’t know what she 追加するs to the movement really

He also laid into Kim and said she wasn't 促進するing feminism when she 提起する／ポーズをとるd for a racy topless snap with model Emily Ratajkowski that year.?

In March last year during Good Morning Britain, the 星／主役にする said:?'I saw Kim Kardashian flipping the bird doing a topless selfie to her millions of 信奉者s, many of whom are impressionable young girls ?that can’t be a good example of feminism.'???

'She does it in the 指名する of 解放するing and 権力を与えるing women and feminism, to me that can’t be and shouldn’t be what feminism is.’

Singer Annie Lennox concurred: 'That’s her 見解／翻訳／版 of feminism, it’s not 地雷 and it’s not Helen's'.

She continued: 'For me, because of my 絶対の かかわり合い to that 問題／発行する, I’ve been to Ethopia and done things 儀礼 of Comic 救済.

No holding back: He finished his comments with: 'The only thing moving is her breasts. It's reassuring isn’t it that some things never change'

No 持つ／拘留するing 支援する: He finished his comments with: 'The only thing moving is her breasts. It's 安心させるing isn’t it that some things never change'

'I'm 深く，強烈に 伴う／関わるd in the basic things like trying to get women 接近 to education, let alone basic 支払う／賃金. The western world is in a 泡.'???

一方／合間, Kim defended her 権利 to 地位，任命する naked selfies while on the red carpet at the Vogue 100 祝祭 dinner in London last May.

She said at the time: 'For me, it wasn't even about flaunting it. I felt good about myself so let ME do what I feel comfortable with. If you are 保守的な and if you're not comfortable with that, that's amazing, too.'

But Piers said: 'She's wrong about the naked selfies. Do that to Kanye. I've got no problem with what she does in her own life.???

追加するing: 'Doing it to a bunch of millions of young girls... is that really the arbiter of success for women in the world now? No, it's not... Be stylish. Be 冷静な／正味の, be sexy, be genuinely 権力を与えるing.'???

Nude: In March 2016, Piers and Kim became embroiled in a spat after he criticised her nude mirror selfie, leading Kim to hit back saying, ‘never offer to buy a married woman clothes'

Nude: In March 2016 Piers and Kim became embroiled in a spat after he criticised her 完全に nude mirror selfie, 主要な Kim to 攻撃する，衝突する 支援する 説, ‘never 申し込む／申し出 to buy a married woman 着せる／賦与するs'

Piers also criticised?Emily Ratajkowski's steamy spaghetti ビデオ for the LOVE advent calendar earlier this month,?after Emily branded his comments about her 'sexist'.

A riled Piers said: 'You know our old friend Emily Ratajkowski, the 全世界の bimbo who parades naked in spaghetti for Feminist empowerment???

He continued: 'She's been asked about my Tweets about her' before reading out lines from the brunette beauty's?Grazia interview in which she said: 'It’s sexism, 基本的に.?

'I think there’s a valid argument behind the idea that sexiness is patriarchal, and that’s problematic.

Controversial: Piers also laid into Kim and said she wasn't promoting feminism when she posed for a racy topless snap with model Emily Ratajkowski in 2016

議論の的になる:?He also laid into Kim and said she wasn't 促進するing feminism when she 提起する／ポーズをとるd for a racy topless snap with model Emily Ratajkowski that year

'But that 存在 said, it can be really 限界ing to young women who feel like that’s their self-表現; someone telling them that they can’t do that is 抑えるing.'

A 混乱させるd Piers 答える／応じるd: 'What does any of that even mean Emily???

'You were just writhing naked in spaghetti - Emmeline Pankhurst you're not love. Sorry that's it - you're not.

'It's not about sexism or feminism, it's not.What a senseless waste of pasta. We know from looking at you you don't eat pasta - what a waste.'??

Piers has previ ously slammed Emily for sending her friends and family naked Christmas cards, while he was also 伴う／関わるd in an online 列／漕ぐ／騒動 with Kim over her relentless naked selfies.

The Blurred Lines beauty 原因（となる）d a 動かす on social マスコミ when the clip of her writhing around on a （米）棚上げする／（英）提議する 十分な of greasy spaghetti in just her underwear was 解放（する）d.

Criticism: Piers also criticised Emily Ratajkowski 's steamy spaghetti video for the LOVE advent calendar earlier this month, after Emily branded his comments about her 'sexist'

批評: Piers also criticised Emily Ratajkowski 's steamy spaghetti ビデオ for the LOVE advent calendar earlier this month, after Emily branded his comments about her 'sexist'

This led to her 令状ing an 情熱的な 地位，任命する to fans after she was criticised for the ビデオ.

?Emily explained: 'To me, 女性（の） sexuality and sexiness, no 事柄 how 条件d it may be by a patriarchal ideal, can be incredibly 権力を与えるing for a woman if she feels it is 権力を与えるing to her.

'The way I dress, 行為／法令／行動する, flirt, dance, have sex ― those are my 決定／判定勝ち（する）s and they shouldn’t be 衝撃d by men. 存在 sexy is fun and I like it. I should never have to apologise for that.'

The Blurred Lines beauty caused a stir on social media when the clip of her writhing around on a table full of greasy spaghetti in just her underwear was released?

The Blurred Lines beauty 原因（となる）d a 動かす on social マスコミ when the clip of her writhing around on a （米）棚上げする／（英）提議する 十分な of greasy spaghetti in just her underwear was 解放（する）d?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?