目印 EU-US data privacy 法廷，裁判所 事例／患者 opens in Dublin
A （選挙などの）運動をする by Austrian privacy lawyer Max Schrems against Facebook's 移転 of personal data from Europe to the US is 存在 heard in an Irish 法廷，裁判所 from Tuesday, the 最新の 新たな展開 in a long 合法的な 戦う／戦い.
The 目印 事例／患者 in Ireland, where the US tech 巨大（な） has its European （警察，軍隊などの）本部, will have serious repercussions for personal privacy 政策s and trans-大西洋 商売／仕事.
The US 政府 will be 許すd to make 代表s to the 法廷，裁判所, を強調するing the importance of the 事例／患者.
Austrian privacy 選挙運動者 Max Schrems wants to stop Facebook's 移転 of personal data from Europe to the US ?JOE KLAMAR (AFP/とじ込み／提出する)
Ireland's Data 保護 Commissioner (DPC) is asking the country's High 法廷，裁判所 to 言及する the 機械装置s used to 移転 data between the EU and the US to the European 法廷，裁判所 of 司法（官）, 説 that such 問題／発行するs cannot be decided at 国家の level.
The 合法的な 活動／戦闘 follows a （民事の）告訴 to the DPC by Schrems about Facebook's use of いわゆる 基準 contractual 条項s (SCCs) to 移転 personal data from Europe to the US.
In a 一時的に finding, the 監視者 last year said Schrems's argument against the tech 巨大（な） was "井戸／弁護士席 設立するd".
SCCs are now 広範囲にわたって used by data 輸出業者s and are ーするつもりであるd to 許す for the 合法的な 移転 of data from EU 国民s as long as "適する 保護" is in place.
Mason Hayes & Curran, the Dublin-based 合法的な team 事実上の／代理 for Facebook, earlier 警告するd in a 要点説明 公式文書，認める of the 消極的な 衝撃 a 敗北・負かす would have on its （弁護士の）依頼人 and other 多国籍のs.
"The 普及した 利益／興味 in this 事例／患者 arises, in part, from the 可能性のある 経済的な and 商業の consequences that could flow from a 判決，裁定 that the SCC 決定／判定勝ち（する）s are 無効の," it said.
The lawyers 引用するd 見積（る）s 説 that if services and cross-国境 data flows were to be 混乱に陥れる／中断させるd, the European Union's 甚だしい／１２ダース 国内の 製品 (GDP) could be 攻撃する，衝突する by as much as 1.3 百分率 points.
- No 是正する? -
Facebook argues there is nothing wrong with the 現在の system and that there is no need for a referral.
It was 軍隊d to switch to SCCs last year after the European 法廷，裁判所 of 司法（官） 支配するd in 2015 that the 安全な Harbour 枠組み, which had 治める／統治するd the EU-US flow of personal data, contravened EU 法律 because the privacy of European 国民s could not be 保証（人）d in the US.
The SCCs ar e considered as something of a stopgap 手段 designed to 許す the 移転 of data, 未解決の 協定 on a more 包括的な 政権.
Schrems, whose （民事の）告訴s 結局 led to the demise of 安全な Harbour, is a party to the 訴訟／進行s と一緒に Facebook.
He argues that the Irish 監視者 already has the 力／強力にする to stop data 移転s from Facebook and should use it.
He also says that the SCCs 申し込む／申し出 no 是正する for European 国民s in the US in the event of their data 存在 接近d by a third party, such as US 知能 services, or 妥協d in some other way.
The 審理，公聴会s in Dublin are 予定 to last three weeks.
