陪審／陪審員団 says it's 行き詰まるd in 'We Build The 塀で囲む' 詐欺 裁判，公判
NEW YORK (AP) - A 陪審／陪審員団 said it was 行き詰まるd Thursday in its 審議s of 告発（する），告訴（する）／料金s against a Colorado 実業家 （刑事）被告 of defrauding thousands of 投資家s in a 塀で囲む along the southern U.S. 国境 hours after 11 賠審員s turned against one 賠審員, 告発する／非難するing him of "political bias" and 説 he'd labeled the 残り／休憩（する） of them 自由主義のs.
U.S. 地区 裁判官 Analisa Torres 拒絶するd a 弁護 request to 宣言する a mistrial and instead read a いわゆる "Allen 告発（する），告訴（する）／料金," designed to 誘発する 生産力のある 審議s Friday in the 裁判，公判 of Timothy Shea. 賠審員s were then sent home.
The 初めの four 被告s in the 事例／患者 含むd Steve Bannon, an 助言者 to ex-大統領 Donald Trump who was 容赦d by Trump 早期に last year. Two others pleaded 有罪の to 告発（する），告訴（する）／料金s.
The 起訴 付随するd to a "We Build The 塀で囲む" （選挙などの）運動をする that raised about $25 million for a 塀で囲む. Only a few miles of 塀で囲む were built. 検察官，検事s said Shea and other 基金 組織者s 約束d 投資家s that all 寄付s would 基金 a 塀で囲む, but Shea and others 結局 siphoned away hundreds of thousands of dollars for themselves.
Shea, of 城 激しく揺する, Colorado, owns an energy drink company, Winning Energy, whose cans have featured a 風刺漫画 superhero image of Trump and （人命などを）奪う，主張する to 含む／封じ込める "12 oz. of 自由主義の 涙／ほころびs."
Earlier Thursday, 11 賠審員s said in a 公式文書，認める to the 裁判官 that they were 全員一致で requesting that one 賠審員 be 取って代わるd by an 補欠／交替の／交替する 賠審員 because the 賠審員 had shown anti-政府 bias and had （刑事）被告 all the others of 存在 自由主義のs.
In their 非常に長い 公式文書，認める, the 賠審員s told Torres that the 賠審員 had said things such as "政府 witch 追跡（する）" and （刑事）被告 the 政府 of bringing the 事例／患者 in New York City because it "knew people here 投票（する） 異なって." The 公式文書，認める said the 賠審員 追加するd that the 裁判，公判 "should have been tried in a southern 明言する／公表する."
The 賠審員s also （刑事）被告 the 賠審員 of 説: "Tim Shea is a good man. He doesn't （警官の）巡回区域，受持ち区域 his wife."
Aft er the 賠審員s requested that the 賠審員 be 取って代わるd, Torres interviewed him in her 式服ing room with lawyers from both 味方するs 現在の. She asked him several questions 目的（とする）d at 決定するing if he was biased.
The 審理，公聴会, which wasn't open to the public, produced answers that 原因（となる）d the 裁判官 to order 賠審員s to 再開する 審議s. Ninety minutes later, they returned a 公式文書，認める that said: "We cannot agree on a 全員一致の 判決 on any of the counts."
弁護 弁護士／代理人／検事 John Meringolo had requested a mistrial hours earlier, 競うing that the 陪審／陪審員団 had 明らかにする／漏らすd so much about 審議s in their 公式文書，認める that they had 侵害する／違反するd 指示／教授／教育s to keep their 会談 secret. After the 行き詰まる 公式文書，認める, he 再開するd his request for a mistrial and the 裁判官 辞退するd it again.
