労働 could re-nationalise the 鉄道s within five years
A 労働 政府 could re-nationalise the entire 鉄道 system within the first five years of taking office, 影をつくる／尾行する （ドイツなどの）首相／（大学の）学長 John McDonnell has said.
As 委任する／代表s were 集会 in Liverpool for the party’s 年次の 会議／協議会, Mr McDonnell said they were already looking at the 詳細（に述べる） as to how it could be 達成するd.
労働’s 2017 総選挙 manifesto 誓約（する）d to bring 支援する the 私的な 鉄道 companies into public 所有権 as the 現在の franchises 満了する／死ぬ.
However, in an interview with the BBC 無線で通信する 4 Today programme, Mr McDonnell 示唆するd they could take advantage of break 条項s in the 契約s to 行為／法令／行動する earlier.
影をつくる／尾行する （ドイツなどの）首相／（大学の）学長 John McDonnell (Steve Parsons/PA)
Asked whether they could all be 公然と owned in the first 称する，呼ぶ／期間／用語 of the 労働 政府, he said: “I think that’s possible. That’s why we’re working through the 詳細（に述べる） now of how that can be done.
“If you look at what’s happened over time a number of these franchises have been 手渡すd 支援する anyway.
“I think we are in a 状況／情勢 now where I think that is certainly possible. We want to get to within the first 称する，呼ぶ／期間／用語 of a 労働 政府 an 統合するd 鉄道 system.”
Under his 計画（する）s, 労働 would 設立する a public 所有権 u nit within the 財務省 and develop 合法的な and 財政上の 計画（する）s to renationalise 産業s such as water.
“We will have new structures of 政府. I’ll be ready on day one going into 政府 to be able to bring 今後 the 法律制定, to 器具／実施する the 政策,” he said.
The 部隊 would also advise on 補償（金） to 株主s and help decide which 私的な 財政／金融 率先s (PFIs) should be taken 支援する into public 手渡すs.
In some 事例／患者s, he 示唆するd, no 補償（金） may be needed.
“We will がまんする by the 合法的な advice that is 供給するd to us. If the 合法的な advice that is 供給するd to us is we are not 強いるd to 供給する 補償（金） to some, then we will follow that advice,” he said.
“There might be some factors in relation to some 操作／手術s of PFIs in particular that could be brought 今後 that says 現実に there is no compensatory 手はず／準備 needed here.”
（ドイツなどの）首相／（大学の）学長 Philip Hammond said Mr McDonnell’s 計画（する）s would mean a £176 billion “borrowing binge” in the first year of a 労働 政府.
“観念的な re-nationalisation would lead to いっそう少なく choice and poorer services. It would put 政治家，政治屋s in day to day 支配（する）／統制する of our 決定的な services, meaning nowhere for people to turn when things go wrong,” he said.
“労働 aren’t fit to 治める／統治する and working people would 支払う／賃金 the price if they ever got the chance.”
