Widower of nurse who died after her 癌 was 行方不明になるd calls for 調査
The widower of a nurse who died from cervical 癌 after she was wrongly told by doctors a smear 実験（する） and 生体検査 were normal has called for an 調査 into other 可能性のある 犠牲者s.
Kevin O’Connor, 50, said he believed more women could have developed 癌 after 苦しむing the same level of care as his wife Julie.
The 49-year-old mother of two died in February last year after 存在 given the all-（疑いを）晴らす from a smear 実験（する） and a later 生体検査.
Mr O’Connor, who 作品 for the Civil 航空 当局, spoke out after Avon 検死官 Maria Voisin 最高潮の場面d three 甚だしい／１２ダース failings and 結論するd she died from “natural 原因（となる）s 与える／捧げるd to by neglect”.
Kevin O´Connor 持つ／拘留するs a picture of his wife Julie outside Avon 検死官´s 法廷，裁判所 in Flax Bourton, 近づく Bristol (棒 Minchin/PA)
“We are 満足させるd with the 結論 of neglect by the 検死官.
“We hope this will go a long way to help and 保護する other women in the 未来,” said Mr O’Connor, from Thornbury, South Gloucestershire.
“For Julie this was never about 非難する.
“Julie 努力する／競うd in her final years to give wom en the 信用／信任 to question the professionals.
“We hope that by the 活動／戦闘s and 推薦s 障壁s and 保護（する）／緊急輸入制限s are put in place to 保護する all women.
“Cervical 審査 does save lives.
“We want to 確実にする we have a 安全な cervical 審査 and gynaecological service.”
Mr O’Connor said he believed his wife was not the only 犠牲者 and 追加するd: “We need to have a wider review now and consider other 犠牲者s.
“ーするために go 今後 we put 保護（する）／緊急輸入制限s and 障壁s in place, but to do so we do need to look backwards and consider whether there are other 犠牲者s out there.”
The 検死 heard Mrs O’Connor 繰り返して went to see her GP over a 14-month period complaining of gynaecological problems and was referred three times, twice under the two-week 癌 pathway, to Southmead Hospital in Bristol for その上の 実験（する）s.
Doctors told Mrs O’Connor in October 2015 that an endometrial 生体検査 was 消極的な and the hospital had also 供給するd a “誤った 肯定的な” result to a 決まりきった仕事 smear 実験（する） carried out the previous year.
Avon 検死官’s 法廷，裁判所 heard that by August 2016 Mrs O’Connor had returned to her GP with the same symptoms and was referred 支援する to Southmead 尋問 cervical 癌 and the nurse was seen within two weeks but told her cervix “looked normal”.
By November she was still unwell and her GP made a third referral to the specialists who saw her in February 2017.
She was 予定 to を受ける その上の 実験（する）s at Southmead the に引き続いて month but decided to instead to see a 顧問 at a 私的な hospital who すぐに 嫌疑者，容疑者／疑うd cervical 癌.
その上の 実験（する）s showed the 癌 had spread and she underwent chemotherapy and 放射線療法.
She died in a hospice いっそう少なく than 12 months after the 癌 was 確認するd.
Mrs O´Connor was a 患者 at Southmead Hospital in Bristol (Ben Birchall/PA)
演説（する）／住所ing the 法廷，裁判所, the 検死官 said she had 焦点（を合わせる）d on the 失敗s that could have 原因（となる）d or 与える／捧げるd to Mrs O’Connor’s death.
“Firstly, the 失敗 to 報告（する）／憶測 the smear 実験（する） 正確に in September 2014; secondly, the 失敗 to 報告（する）／憶測 the endometrial 生体検査 正確に in October 2015; thirdly, the 失敗 to recognise the clinically obvious 癌 of the cervix or a 失敗 to recognise the need of その上の 査定／評価 in August 2016; and fourthly, the 失敗 to recognise the clinically obvious 癌 of the cervix or a 失敗 to recognise the need of その上の 査定／評価 in November 2016.
“I consider that based on the 証拠 I have heard the 失敗 to 報告（する）／憶測 the smear 実験（する） 正確に was a 甚だしい／１２ダース 失敗 and the その上の 査定／評価s in both August and November 2016 were also 甚だしい／１２ダース 失敗s.”
Mrs Voisin said she would also be 令状ing to the Department of Health and Social Care, 同様に as the 王室の College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, with her findings.
Tim Whittlestone, of the North Bristol NHS 信用, apologised to Mrs O’Connor’s family for the errors made in her care.
“その上に, we are so very sorry to her family and friends for the 苦しめる we 原因（となる）d them,” he said.
“I would like to 再確認する that North Bristol NHS 信用 調査／捜査するs mistakes and does learn from those mistakes.
“I would like to reassu re 患者s that as a direct result of Julie we have 改善するd the way we 診察する 患者s and indeed in our ability to 診断する cervical 癌.”
