Bercow 示唆するs `共謀´ in play to 否定する him a peerage

Former ありふれたs (衆議院の)議長 John Bercow has (人命などを)奪う,主張するd there is a “共謀” to stop him getting a seat in the House of Lords.

Mr Bercow said it was?“blindingly obvious” that there was an organised (選挙などの)運動をする to stop him receiving a peerage.

労働 has 指名するd the former Tory MP for a peerage after his party 拒絶する/低下するd to do so, breaking with the 条約 that (衆議院の)議長s are elevated to the ありふれたs once they retire.

A number of 目だつ Brexiteers have (刑事)被告 Mr Bercow of 行為/行うing a プロの/賛成の-Remain 協議事項 when he was (衆議院の)議長.

圧力(をかける)d on whether his chances of a peerage had disappeared, Mr Bercow told the BBC: “I didn’t say that. You asked me whether there was a 一致した (選挙などの)運動をする, whether there was a 共謀, whether there was an organised 成果/努力 and I said it is blindingly obvious that that is so.”

The comments (機の)カム as 労働 副 leadership 候補者 夜明け Butler said the former (衆議院の)議長 may himself be a 犠牲者 of いじめ(る)ing after the Tories 辞退するd to award him a peerage.

She said the 保守的なs’ 決定/判定勝ち(する) to 出発/死 with tradition and not reward Mr Bercow after his 10年間 in the 議長,司会を務める could be “a form of いじめ(る)ing too”.

The 影をつくる/尾行する women and equalities 大臣 追加するd that the 焦点(を合わせる) should be on why the Tories did not 指名する the former (衆議院の)議長 in the first place, 示唆するing it was “to do with Brexit”.

Ms Butler’s comments (機の)カム after it was 確認するd that a third (民事の)告訴 has been submitted about Mr Bercow’s behaviour.

Mr Bercow has 否定するd all 主張s of いじめ(る)ing made against him.

Speaking on Sky’s Sophy 山の尾根 On Sunday, Ms Butler said: “It is the norm that the (衆議院の)議長 of the House is always given a peerage so I think the first question for me is why hasn’t he been given a peerage from the 保守的なs?”

She 追加するd: “I would like to know the 推論する/理由 why he wasn’t given a peerage. I 嫌疑者,容疑者/疑う it’s 現実に do to with Brexit rather than anything else.

“The oth er thing is 予定 過程 has to happen so if you 告発する/非難する somebody of いじめ(る)ing there has to be 予定 過程.”

Ms Butler said: “If John Bercow’s been (刑事)被告 of いじめ(る)ing then there needs to be 予定 過程 and has he been 設立する 有罪の or is it just an 告訴,告発? And I think those are the things that we have to go through.

“We really do need to ask the 保守的なs why is it that you 港/避難所’t, like everybody else, 確実にするd that the (衆議院の)議長 of the House is given a peerage? さもなければ I think that is a form of いじめ(る)ing too.”

Retiring (衆議院の)議長s are 伝統的に 指名するd for a peerage by the 総理大臣 but Boris Johnson 辞退するd to 指名する Mr Bercow.

Former Clerk of the House Lord Lisvane and former 黒人/ボイコット 棒 中尉/大尉/警部補-General David Leakey have とじ込み/提出するd (民事の)告訴s against Mr Bercow.

中尉/大尉/警部補-General Leakey has said Mr Bercow’s 指名/任命 for a peerage is 不適切な because of his behaviour.

Sorry we are not 現在/一般に 受託するing comments on this article.