No need for 明言する／公表する Bank to 保釈（金） out Mallya's sick 航空機による

By Mail Today Comment Updated: 01:10 BST, 23 February 2012

There is 明確に no 経済的な 合理的な／理性的な for the 明言する／公表する Bank of India to 施し物 out another Rs 1500 crore 一括 to 保釈（金） out Vijay Mallya's loss-making Kingfisher 航空機による.

The 1 9-bank 国際借款団／連合, of which SBI is a part, had serious 疑惑s over 延長するing その上の credit to the 沈むing 航空機による, as their earlier 貸付金s have now been 名簿（に載せる）／表（にあげる）d as 非，不，無-成し遂げるing 資産s.

It is indeed strange that SBI has suddenly broken 階級s with the 残り／休憩（する） to 押し進める through the 一括 on its own.

There is no 経済的な 合理的な／理性的な for the 明言する／公表する Bank of India to 施し物 out another Rs 1500 crore 一括 to 保釈（金） out the loss-making Kingfisher 航空機による

It also raises the question as to whether the norms have been followed by public 部門 banks in 延長するing the fresh 貸付金 to Kingfisher which is on the 瀬戸際 of 破産.

提案s for such 貸付金s have to be vetted by the credit 評価 委員会 of the bank and the Kingfisher 事例／患者 does not seem to be the type that せねばならない have easily passed 召集（する）.

In April last year, Mr Mallya had pulled out a rabbit from his hat in getting the country's public 部門 banks, 含むing SBI and Punjab 国家の Bank, to come up with a 再編成 一括 which had them 変える their 負債 into 公正，普通株主権.

These banks had to buy 株 of the loss-making company at a 賞与金 and 減ずる 利益／興味 率s on 貸付金s.

In the 過程 the banks had to take a hair 削減（する） of Rs 500 crore when the value of Kingfisher 株 急落するd to いっそう少なく than half the value.

By 延長するing a second bailout 一括, SBI has nearly 二塁打d its （危険などに）さらす to the debtridden 航空機による to a whopping Rs 3,100 crore in what seems to be a classical 事例／患者 of throwing good money after bad.

議会 支援する to its old tricks

The Union 政府's 否定 about a move to give statutory status to the model code of 行為／行う, seen as a means to 抑制（する） the 選挙 （売買）手数料，委託（する）／委員会／権限's 力／強力にするs, 欠如（する）s 信用性.

It seems more likely that it has given up the idea for now on account of 批評 from the 欧州共同体 and the 野党s.

By raking up the 問題／発行する, the 議会 party has betrayed once again the contempt in which it 持つ／拘留するs democratic 会・原則s.

India's oldest party is also the one 責任がある robbing most of its 会・原則s of their efficacy and it seems the 欧州共同体 is its next 的.

This is truly unfortunate because the 欧州共同体 is that rare 会・原則 in India that has lived up to its 委任統治（領） in the last two １０年間s, doing a fair 取引，協定 to make 選挙s 解放する／自由な and fair.

But, as became （疑いを）晴らす during the 論争 伴う／関わるing the 法律 大臣, it needs more 力／強力にするs to 施行する its 令状 during the 選挙（人）の 過程.

However, instead of 勧めるing in 選挙（人）の 改革（する）s, our largest party wants to 減らす the 欧州共同体's 力／強力にするs.

And, all because it wants to 固執する with its deviou s games to 支持を得ようと努める the 選挙民, as have been on show in the 明言する／公表する of Uttar Pradesh.

明言する／公表する 目的 behind NCTC

Jammu and Kashmir 長，指導者 大臣 Omar Abdullah

The Union 政府, the 省 of home 事件／事情／状勢s (MHA) in particular, has only itself to 非難する for the stand-off on the 国家の 反対する-テロ行為 Centre (NCTC).

There is, of course, the 脅し that the 創造 of such a 団体／死体 提起する／ポーズをとるs to the country's 連邦の structure.

And the fact that 長，指導者 大臣s from the UPA's 選挙権を持つ／選挙人 parties - Omar Abdullah and Mamata Banerjee - have 発言する／表明するd their unhappiness over the NCTC shows that the Centre has failed to take the 明言する／公表する 政府s along on the 事柄.

The MHA has also not 供給するd a 納得させるing explanation as to why it has chosen to place the NCTC under the 知能 Bureau (IB).

As the IB is not 支配する to any 合法的な 法令 and there is no 機械装置 for 議会の oversight of the NCTC, the 恐れるs that the 団体／死体 might become an 当局 unto itself are 本物の.

The MHA must also explain as to what happens to the 国家の 調査 機関 after the 提案するd NCTC comes into 存在.

If the NIA is as 効果的な an anti-terror 機関 as the MHA （人命などを）奪う，主張するs, what is the need for another such 機関?