Apex 法廷，裁判所 激突するs 打点 and SEBI over chit 基金 scams?

• e-mail

The SC （法廷の）裁判 has （刑事）被告 the 打点 and SEBI of turning a blind 注目する，もくろむ to chit 基金 スキャンダルs. Pictured is?打点 知事 Raghuram Rajan

As the Central Bureau of 調査 (CBI) 調査（する）s into the multi-crore Saradha and Ponzi 計画／陰謀s 伸び（る）d 勢い, the 最高裁判所 on Friday for the first time 直接／まっすぐに slammed 安全s and 交流 Board of India (SEBI) and Reserve Bank of India (打点) and said they were 大部分は 責任がある “scams of such magnitude not just taking birth but 繁栄するing 邪魔されない”.

“Even while ordering a CBI 調査（する） into Saradha and other scams on May 9 last year, we had touched upon the 役割 of the regulatory 当局 like SEBI, Registrar of Companies and 公式の／役人s of the 打点 within whose 各々の 裁判権s and areas of 操作／手術 the scam has been 報告（する）／憶測d. They should not have turned a blind 注目する，もくろむ,” a （法廷の）裁判 長，率いるd by 司法（官） T.S. Thakur said.?

“All 有罪の 公式の／役人s who connived have to be 調査／捜査するd. There should be nothing outside the 範囲 of 調査,” the （法廷の）裁判 said.?

The （法廷の）裁判 read out its last year’s order which said?“The synopsis of 調査s goes to the extent of 示唆するing that 正規の／正選手 支払い（額）s に向かって 賄賂 were paid through middleman to some of those who were supposed to keep an 注目する，もくろむ on such ponzi companies.?

“The Regulatory 当局, it is ありふれた ground, 演習 their 力／強力にするs and 裁判権 under Central 法律制定s. Possible 黙認 of those who were 告発（する），告訴（する）／料金d with the 義務 of 妨げるing the scams of such nature in 違反 of the 法律, therefore, needs to be closely 診察するd and 効果的に dealt with. 調査 into the larger 共謀 angle will, thus, 必然的に bring such statutory regulators also under scrutiny”.?

Rs 2,000 crore scam

The 観察s from the （法廷の）裁判 come a month after the CBI 診察するd a Sebi whole-time member Rajiv Agarwal.?

The 機関 has thus far 診察するd a number of 上級の Sebi 公式の／役人s but it was for the first time it 記録，記録的な／記録するd the 声明 of a whole-time SEBI member.

The 発言／述べる （機の）カム while the （法廷の）裁判 was 審理，公聴会 a 嘆願（書） 捜し出すing a CBI 調査（する） into a ponzi scam in which 94 West Bengal-based companies collected 基金s to the tune of Rs 2,000 crore and 恐らく defrauded people in West Bengal and Odisha.?

公式文書，認めるing that this 事例／患者 too was covered by the 法廷，裁判所’s May 2014 order as per which it not only ordered CBI 調査（する） into Saradha scam in West Bengal but also all chit 基金-関係のある scam in West Bengal, Orissa, Tripura and Assam, the （法廷の）裁判 directed the petitioner to approach the CBI with the 嘆願（書） and “if they 辞退する, come 支援する to us”.

?Interestingly, SEBI had earlier argued before the 法廷，裁判所 that companies 伴う／関わるd in the scam were doing chit-基金 商売／仕事 and since chit-基金s were not within its 裁判権 it could not have taken cognizance of the same.

But the 法廷，裁判所 said that SEBI had on two earlier occasions directed winding up of such Ponzi 計画／陰謀s and refund of the 量s received by the companies 関心d to the depositors.

Therefore, the 法廷，裁判所 was of the 見解（をとる） that 安全 交流 Board of India having 診察するd the 問題／発行する, they could no longer argue that it had no 役割 to play in the 事柄.?

黙認?

“If it is 設立する that Sebi did have the jur isdiction to 行為／法令／行動する in the 事柄 but failed to do so then such 失敗 may tantamount to 黙認 and call for 活動／戦闘 against those who failed to 行為／法令／行動する diligently in the 事柄. 十分である to say, that the scam of this magnitude, going on for years unnoticed and unchecked, is suggestive of a 深い-rooted apathy if not 犯罪の neglect on the part of the regulators,” the 法廷，裁判所 had said in its May 9, 2014, order.

?