Uber 強姦 犠牲者 moves 最高裁判所 against order that would 軍隊 her to give 証拠 for a second time

• e-mail

Delhi High 法廷，裁判所 has 許すd （刑事）被告 Shiv Kumar Yadav (centre) to 解任する and 診察する 13 証言，証人／目撃するs in the Uber 強姦 裁判，公判

The 25-year-old woman, who was 恐らく 強姦d by the driver of an Uber taxi moved the 最高裁判所 on Monday challenging the Delhi High 法廷，裁判所 order 許すing （刑事）被告 Shiv Kumar Yadav to 解任する and 診察する 13 証言，証人／目撃するs in the 裁判，公判.?

In the 嘆願（書）, which will come up for 審理，公聴会 on Tuesday, she has said the High 法廷，裁判所 should not have permitted the （刑事）被告 to indulge in such 延期するing 策略.?

Giving a new spin to the whole 事例／患者, she has also （人命などを）奪う，主張するd that the （刑事）被告’s lawyer Alok Kumar Dubey “did not have a 妨げる／法廷，弁護士業 会議 of India 証明書 to practice” and it was part of a larger design to create 混乱 and 論争 over the 事例／患者 and 可能にする a re-裁判，公判.?

But the 地裁 and 裁判，公判 法廷，裁判所 had 拒絶するd it, 説 the 嘆願 was never made at any 行う／開催する／段階 until the entire 起訴 証拠 was の近くにd, the 声明 of （刑事）被告 was 記録，記録的な／記録するd, the 事柄 was 直す／買収する，八百長をするd for arguments and no 記録，記録的な／記録する was also produced in this regard.?

The 犠牲者 also 称する，呼ぶ／期間／用語d as “全く wrong” the 結論 of the High 法廷，裁判所 that it is the （刑事）被告 alone who stands to 苦しむ on account of the 延期する, and said: “It is the 犠牲者 who 苦しむs the most for having to go through a 裁判，公判 事実上 from the beginning all over again."?

“The 裁判，公判 法廷，裁判所 and the High 法廷，裁判所 have not given any 推論する／理由 as to why they 突然の jumped to the 結論 that 解任する and re-examination were necessary.?

"The order is 憲法違反の and in 違反 of 原則s regarding 解任する,” the 犠牲者’s 嘆願（書） said.?

On March 4, the Delhi High 法廷，裁判所 had 許すd the 解任する of 13 起訴 証言，証人／目撃するs, 含むing the 犠牲者 in the Uber cab 強姦 事例／患者, on the 嘆願 of the （刑事）被告 driver and said their cross-examination will be carried out on a day-to-day basis.?

The High 法廷，裁判所 had partly 許すd the 嘆願 of （刑事）被告 Yadav while making it （疑いを）晴らす not to repeat any question which has already been put to the 証言，証人／目撃するs in their cross-examination by the earlier counsel.?

Apart from the 犠牲者, the 法廷，裁判所 also 許すd the 解任する of 調査／捜査するing officers 同様に as some doctors who had 診察するd the 犠牲者 and the （刑事）被告.?

It had also said that in 事例／患者 any 証言，証人／目撃する is not 利用できる for the 目的 of その上の cross-examination, his/her 証言 shall be read in 証拠 as it is .?

The 犠牲者 is now 存在 re-診察するd on-camera by the counsel for Yadav in the 裁判，公判 法廷，裁判所.?