Do I really have to 支払う／賃金 a customs 告発（する），告訴（する）／料金 for 棚上げにするs I bought online from 中国? DEAN DUNHAM replies

A new 消費者 法律 called the 数字表示式の Markets, 競争 and 消費者s 行為／法令／行動する 焦点（を合わせる）s on 確実にするing that 仲買人s’ 活動／戦闘s do not 害（を与える） UK 消費者s, says Dean

Dean says that 'Chinese 仲買人s are 悪名高い for ignoring 消費者 （民事の）告訴s or 解任するing them'

Your next step is therefore to 接触する the Chinese 仲買人 and tell them they have 違反d the DMCC by failing to 公表する／暴露する their true 貿易（する）ing 場所 and failing to be transparent about the true cost of the goods. You will then be する権利を与えるd to 需要・要求する either a refund of the £135 or to 拒絶する the goods and receive a 十分な refund. If you 選ぶ for the latter, in circumstances where you are returning the goods 予定 to a 違反 of the 法律 (as …に反対するd to 簡単に because you have changed your mind), the shipping costs associated with returning the goods 落ちる on the 仲買人, not you.

Unfortunately, Chinese 仲買人s are 悪名高い for ignoring 消費者 （民事の）告訴s or di smissing them. If this happens, turn to your card provider and make a chargeback （人命などを）奪う，主張する if you paid by debit card or, if you paid by credit card, you can raise either a chargeback or Section 75 （人命などを）奪う，主張する.

My brother-in-法律 is （人命などを）奪う，主張するing that a £1,200 貸付金 I gave him was 現実に a wedding gift that he does not have to 返す. Is he 権利?

T.W., 経由で email.

Dean Dunham replies: There is a presumption under English 法律 that there are no 合法的な relations between family.

In other words, in your 事例／患者, the 法律 will assume that this money was indeed a gift unless you can 証明する さもなければ.

This is why it is so important to 始める，決める out the 詳細（に述べる）s of any 貸付金 in 令状ing, 記録，記録的な／記録するing that the money is 存在 前進するd as a 貸付金 and the 重要な 条件, such as the 量 of any 利益／興味 to be paid on the 貸付金 and the 返済 条件.

Read More

My 隣人 flooded my flat but says I have to 支払う／賃金: DEAN DUNHAM 明らかにする／漏らすs how to を取り引きする 論争

As with 隣人 論争s, I always advise that you do all you can to 解決する the 事柄 友好的に, as 落ちるing out with family members is 明白に not 望ましい. Perhaps try to reach a 妥協 by agreeing a 支払い（額） 計画（する） and/or 受託するing a 減ずるd 量, but in doing so you will want to get this 協定 in 令状ing.

Unfortunately, if this doesn’t work, your only 選択 will be to 問題／発行する a （人命などを）奪う，主張する in the small （人命などを）奪う，主張するs 法廷，裁判所.

However, before you take this step, you need to get your house in order by 集会 all 関連した （警察などへの）密告，告訴（状） and 証拠.

Most importantly, as you are （人命などを）奪う，主張するing this is a 貸付金 and not a gift, you will need to produce 証拠 to 立証する this ? without it you will not 納得させる a 裁判官.

The best 証拠 would 明白に be a written 協定, but if you do not have this, you will have to think outside the box.

Consider if you 交流d any written communications (emails, texts, etc.) and if you did, do they 明言する／公表する or 示唆する this was a 貸付金, not a gift? Were there any 証言，証人／目撃するs 現在の when you discussed the 貸付金 and if so, will they be willing to speak on your に代わって in 法廷，裁判所 to 確認する this?

If you are able to gather enough 証拠, you can 問題／発行する your （人命などを）奪う，主張する online ? find 詳細（に述べる）s by typing ‘money （人命などを）奪う，主張する online’ into a search engine.

• 令状 to Dean Dunham, Money Mail, 9 Derry Street, London, W8 5HY or email d.dunham@dailymail.co.uk. No 合法的な 責任／義務 can be 受託するd by the Daily Mail for answ ers given