反対する-party 危険

By This Is Money
Updated: 12:22 BST, 18 April 2008

?

The Daily Mail City Team explain what is meant by 反対する-party 危険

A parlour game?

やめる the opposite. It's no laughing 事柄.

Oops sorry?

Listen carefully, because this is やめる tricky. When banks do 取引，協定s, there's always a 危険 they will go wrong. In the 事例／患者 of 耐える Stearns it did lot s of 取引，協定s before hitting trouble.

Cripes?

Indeed. So had 耐える been 許すd to 崩壊（する）, the bank or 会・原則 on the other 味方する of the 取引，協定 would have been left nursing a 相当な loss. In these 壊れやすい markets, with banks already stretched to the 限界, it would be difficult to 吸収する the 衝撃 and we could have seen 炉心溶融 in the 部門. This is why 耐える needed to be 救助（する）d, and quickly.

So everything's 罰金 now?

JPMorgan Chase, which has agreed to buy 耐える Stearns, has 約束d to 保証（人） the bank's 反対する-party 危険. This means （弁護士の）依頼人s and other banks can have 信用／信任 in still doing 商売／仕事 with 耐える.

Phew

Wait a minute. 恐れるs that other banks could follow 耐える 負かす／撃墜する the same rocky path has sent the cost of 保護するing banks from the 危険 of default 急に上がるing. There is still the chance that other banks may not be able to 会合，会う their 義務s and unlike 耐える they do not have a 買い手 willing to 保釈（金） them out.