REVEALED: The 26 明言する／公表するs where abortion will likely become 違法な if SCOTUS overturns 魚の卵 vs Wade

• e-mail

More than half of all US 明言する／公表するs have some 肉親，親類d of abortion 禁止（する） 法律 that is likely to 施行される if 魚の卵 v Wade is overturned by the 部隊d 明言する／公表するs 最高裁判所, によれば a 報告（する）／憶測.

On Monday, a 漏れるd 最高裁判所 草案 opinion written by Samuel Alito and published by POLITICO 明らかにする／漏らすd that the 法廷，裁判所 has 投票（する）d to strike 負かす／撃墜する the 目印 1973 判決，裁定, which 合法化するd abortion in the 部隊d 明言する／公表するs.

Alito wrote in part, '魚の卵 was egregiously wrong from the start.' The George W. Bush-任命するd 司法（官） goes on to say that the 問題／発行する of abortion should be returned to the 'people's elected 代表者／国会議員s' to decide.?

The opinion was 草案d in February 2022. It's likely that a final 判決，裁定 will be made public within the next two months, 報告（する）／憶測s Politico.??

There are 18 明言する／公表するs that have 近づく-total 禁止（する）s on their 調書をとる／予約するs, while four more have time-限界 禁止（する）d and four others are likely to pass new 禁止（する）s if 魚の卵 is overturned

共和国の／共和党の-任命するd 司法（官）s ? Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett 投票（する）d with Alito.?

And 明言する／公表するs across the country are laying the 基礎 for what comes after the more than 40-year-old 判決，裁定 is 無効にするd.?

によれば the プロの／賛成の-reproductive 権利s group The Guttmacher 学校／設ける, at least 22 明言する／公表するs have 法律s on the 調書をとる／予約するs that would come into 影響 once the 決定／判定勝ち（する） is 公式に 可決する・採択するd.

The organization also identified four more 明言する／公表するs that it 推定する／予想するs to pass new abortion 禁止（する）s in the 近づく 未来, 場内取引員／株価 a total of 26 明言する／公表するs that appear 始める，決める to 禁止（する） the 手続きs

The 18 明言する／公表するs that have 近づく-total 禁止（する）s on abortion already on the 調書をとる／予約するs are Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Idaho, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, West Virginia, Wisconsin and Wyoming.?

In 新規加入,?Georgia, Iowa, Ohio, and South Carolina all have 法律s that 禁止（する） abortions after the six-week 示す.?

At the time of 令状ing, those six-week 禁止（する）s have been 支配するd 憲法違反の.?

On the same day as the Alito opinion was made public, The Washington 地位，任命する?報告（する）／憶測d that 共和国の／共和党の 国会議員s were plotting with プロの／賛成の life 行動主義者s for a 連邦の 禁止（する） on abortions if 魚の卵 was overturned and the GOP won 支援する the house.?

The 学校／設ける also says that four other 明言する／公表するs: Florida, Indiana, Montana and Nebraska, are likely to pass 法案s when 魚の卵 v Wade is overturned.?

Florida already has a 15-week abortion 禁止（する） that will go into 影響 in July 2022. The 法律 does not make any exceptions for 事例／患者s of 強姦 or incest. There is an exception if the health of the 患者 is in danger.

In 調印 the 法律 into 影響, Gov. Ron DeSantis said in a 声明, 'Life is a sacred gift worthy of our 保護, and I am proud to 調印する this 広大な／多数の／重要な piece of 法律制定 which 代表するs the most 重要な 保護s for life in the 明言する／公表する's modern history.'

共和国の／共和党の 任命するd-司法（官）s?Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett (circled) all 投票（する）d to strike 負かす／撃墜する 魚の卵 along with Samuel Alito, POLITICO 報告（する）／憶測d Monday

抗議する人s gather, 詠唱する and 持つ／拘留する 調印するs outside the 最高裁判所 in Washington Monday night?

There were smaller 集会s of anti-abortion 抗議する人s at the event 同様に

Florida 知事 Ron DeSantis passed a 15-week abortion 法律 in April 2022. The 法律 comes into 影響 in July

Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Michigan, Mississippi, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Texas, West Virginia and Wisconsin's 禁止（する）s all have pre-魚の卵 v Wade 法律s that became unenforceable after the 最高裁判所's 1973 決定／判定勝ち（する） - that would kick into 影響 if the 連邦の 合法的な precedent 設立するd in 魚の卵 were overturned.

Alabama, Arizona, Michigan, Mississippi, Oklahoma, West Virginia and Wisconsin's 法律s 許す for abortions if the 患者's life is in danger.?

Alabama also 許すs for abortions ーするために 保存する the health of the 患者.?

Arkansas, Oklahoma, Mississippi and Texas have その上の 禁止（する）s that will come into 影響 if the 法律 was overturned. These were passed 地位，任命する-魚の卵 v Wade.

They're joined by I daho, Kentucky, Louisiana, Missouri, North Dakota, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah and Wyoming, in passing such 法律s.?

The Oklahoma 立法機関 just passed a six-week abortion 禁止（する）, 類似の to Texas, in April 2022. 類似の to the Texas 法律, it 許すs for the 明言する／公表する to とじ込み／提出する 訴訟s against those who are 設立する to have helped someone to get an abortion after the six-week period.?

プロの／賛成の-Life and プロの／賛成の-choice 行動主義者s gather outside the U.S. 最高裁判所 on May 2. によれば Politico's 報告（する）／憶測ing, Alito's 草案 is not final and could change

Oklahoma 知事 Kevin Stitt said in September 2021 tweet, 'I 約束d Oklahomans I would 調印する every piece of プロの／賛成の-life 法律制定 that （機の）カム across my desk.'?

The 明言する／公表するs that will 限界 abortions based on the length of time a 患者 has been 妊娠している are Arkansas, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Missouri, North Dakota and Ohio.?

There are four 明言する／公表するs that have 法律s that believe that abortion is not a constitutionally 保護するd 権利 are Alabama, Louisiana, Texas and West Virginia.??

On the other 味方する of the spectrum, 16 明言する／公表するs and the 地区 of Columbia have 法律s that 保護する a person's 権利 to an abortion.?

The Guttmacher 報告（する）／憶測 公式文書，認めるs that there are over 40 million women who live in 明言する／公表するs with 法律s considered 敵意を持った to those 捜し出すing abortions.

魚の卵 v. Wade: The 目印 1973 最高裁判所 決定／判定勝ち（する） that 合法化するd abortion in America

Norma McCorvey, seen in 1983 - ten years after the 最高裁判所 決定／判定勝ち（する）?

In 1973, the U.S. 最高裁判所 認めるd a woman's 憲法の 権利 to an abortion in 魚の卵 v. Wade. The 目印 判決，裁定 合法化するd abortion 全国的な but divided public opinion an d has been under attack ever since.

The 事例／患者 was とじ込み／提出するd in 1971 by Norma McCorvey, a 22-year-old living in Texas who was unmarried and 捜し出すing a termination of her unwanted pregnancy.

Because of 明言する／公表する 法律制定 妨げるing abortions unless the mother's life is at 危険, she was unable to を受ける the 手続き in a 安全な and 合法的な 環境.

So McCorvey 告訴するd Henry Wade, the Dallas 郡 検察官, in 1970. The 事例／患者 went on to the 最高裁判所, under the とじ込み／提出するing 魚の卵 vs Wade, to 保護する McCorvey's privacy.

最高裁判所 決定／判定勝ち（する）

The 最高裁判所 手渡すd 負かす／撃墜する the watershed 7-2 決定／判定勝ち（する） that a woman's 権利 to make her own 医療の 決定／判定勝ち（する）s, 含むing the choice to have an abortion, is 保護するd under the 14th 改正.

In particular, that the 予定 過程 条項 of the the 14th 改正 供給するs a 根底となる '権利 to privacy' that 保護するs a woman's liberty to choose whether or not to have an abortion.

The 目印 判決，裁定 saw abortions decriminalized in 46 明言する／公表するs, but under 確かな 明確な／細部 条件s which individual 明言する／公表するs could decide on. For example, 明言する／公表するs could decide whether abortions were 許すd only during the first and second trimester but not the third (typically beyond 28 weeks).

衝撃

の中で プロの／賛成の-choice 選挙運動者s, the 決定／判定勝ち（する） was あられ／賞賛するd as a victory which would mean より小数の women would become 本気で - or even fatally - ill from abortions carried out by unqualified or unlicensed practitioners. Moreover, the freedom of choice was considered a 重要な step in the equality fight for women in the country. 犠牲者s of 強姦 or incest would be able to have the pregnancy 終結させるd and not feel coerced into motherhood.

McCorvey became a born again Christian in 1995 and started 支持するing against abortion. Shown above in 1998, she died in 2017?

However, プロの／賛成の-lifers 競うd it was tantamount to 殺人 and that every life, no 事柄 how it was conceived, is precious. Though the 決定／判定勝ち（する） has never been overturned, anti-abortionists have 誘発するd hundreds of 明言する／公表するs 法律s since then 狭くするing the 範囲 of the 判決，裁定.

One such was the 部分的な／不平等な-Birth Abortion 禁止（する） 行為／法令／行動する 調印するd by 大統領 George W. Bush in 2003, which banned a 手続き used to 成し遂げる second-trimester abortions.

Norma McCorvey (Jane 魚の卵)

に引き続いて the 判決，裁定, McCorvey lived a 静かな life until the 1980s when she 明らかにする／漏らすd herself to be Jane 魚の卵.?

McCorvey became a 主要な, outspoken プロの／賛成の-abortion 発言する／表明する in American discourse, even working at a women's clinic where abortions were 成し遂げるd.

However, she 成し遂げるd an ありそうもない U-turn in 1995, becoming a born again Christian and bega n traveling the country speaking out against the 手続き.

In 2003, a she とじ込み／提出するd a 動議 to overturn her 初めの 1973 判決，裁定 with the U.S. 地方裁判所 in Dallas.?

The 動議 moved through the 法廷，裁判所s until it was 最終的に 否定するd by the 最高裁判所 in 2005.

McCorvey died at an 補助装置d living home in Texas in February 2017, 老年の 69.

Shelley Lynn Thornton (Baby 魚の卵)?

Norma McCorvey (Jane 魚の卵)? gave birth to Shelley Lynn Thornton in Dallas in 1970 - a year before the 最高裁判所 魚の卵 v. Wade 事例／患者 was とじ込み／提出するd.?Shelley was the 選び出す／独身 mother's third pregnancy. She gave her up for 採択 the day after giving birth, then continued fighting for the 権利 to abortion afterwards.?

Shelley's 身元 became public last year. She waived her 権利 to anonymity, speaking out in 多重の interviews about the 目印 事例／患者.?

She says that Norma used her for 'publicity', only trying to make 接触する with her when she was a 十代の少年少女 and for the wrong 推論する／理由s.?

'It became 明らかな to me really quickly that the only 推論する／理由 why she 手配中の，お尋ね者 to reach out to me and find me was because she 手配中の，お尋ね者 to use me for publicity. She didn't deserve to 会合，会う me. She never did anything in her life to get that 特権 支援する.

Baby 魚の卵: Shelley Lynn Thornton, a 51-year-old mother of three, has spoken out for the first time on camera. Her 生物学の mother Norma McCorvey was Jane 魚の卵, whose 目印 訴訟 魚の卵 vs Wade won women across America the 権利 to have abortions

'She never 表明するd 本物の feeling for me or 本物の 悔恨 for doing the things that she did, 説 the things that she did over and over and over again,' Shelley said last year.

Shelley has 辞退するd to say whether or not she agrees with abortion, for 恐れる of weaponized by either 味方する of the 審議.?

'A lot of people didn't know I 存在するd. It doesn't 回転する around me, I wasn't the one who created this 法律. I'm not the one who created this movement. I had nothing to do with it. I was just a little itty-bitty thing and, you know, circumstances 勝つ／広く一帯に広がるd.

'My whole thinking is that, "oh God everybody is going to hate me because everyone is going to 非難する me for abortion 存在 合法的な.'