Smug texts 明らかにする／漏らす Brittany Higgins' partner getting giddy over her 夜通し fame, 誇るing of their '力／強力にする' and bragging of having tea with Kevin Rudd at his '$10million penthouse'

• e-mail

漏れるd texts from Brittany Higgins' partner David Shiraz 明らかにする／漏らす he was basking in the fame and 力／強力にする the couple were 'exuding' after her?強姦 主張s were made public.

Ms Higgins' （人命などを）奪う，主張するs she was sexually 強襲，強姦d by?Bruce Lehrmann in a 大臣の office in March 2019, while they were both working as 自由主義の スタッフの一員s, were 公然と 空気／公表するd in her interview with Lisa Wilkinson on The 事業／計画（する）, February 15, 2021.

Mr Lehrmann strenuously 否定するs the 主張s and pleaded not 有罪の during his 中止するd 犯罪の October 裁判，公判.

に引き続いて the bombshell 発覚s, Mr Shiraz sent Ms Higgins repeated texts 熱望して asking if she noticed her growing public profile.

'Are you getting spotted? Are people noticing you? Anyone recognise you?' he texted.

Then, 概略で one month after the interview broadcast on Channel 10 Mr Sharaz sent texts to Ms Higgins that read: 'Don't 溝へはまらせる／不時着する me now you're famous' and 'We exude 力／強力にする'.?

More 漏れるd emails between?Brittany Higgins (pictured left) and her partner David Shiraz (pictured 権利) have 明らかにする／漏らすd the couple were basking in the fame and 力／強力にする the couple were 'exuding' after her 強姦 主張s were made public

Texts sent to Ms Higgins by Mr Shiraz 熱望して asked her if she noticed her growing public profile

Around this time Mr Sharaz also sent Ms Higgins messages 誇るing of 招待するs they received from former 首相s Kevin Rudd and Malcolm Turnbull, who were Labor and 連合 leaders それぞれ.?

Of 存在 招待するd to tea at Dr Rudd's Brisbane apartment Mr Shiraz gloated: 'It's not 正確に／まさに a shack. A $10m penthouse haha'.

The stream of 漏れるd texts has become a political 危機 for the Albanese 政府.

総理大臣 Anthony Albanese,?環境 大臣 Tanya Plibersek and 大蔵大臣 Katy Gallagher all 直面する 告訴，告発s they colluded with Mr Sharaz, Wilkinson and Ms Higgins to 'weaponise' the 強姦 主張s and 損失 the then Morrison 政府.

上院議員 Gallagher has gone to ground after the texts 示唆するd she misled 議会 about whether she had been tipped off about the 事例／患者 before it featured in the マスコミ.

Former defence 大臣 Linda Reynolds, whose office the 出来事/事件 was 申し立てられた／疑わしい to have occurred in during the 早期に hours of?March 23, 2019, made the 告訴，告発 during a 上院 審理，公聴会 on?June 2021.

Another text sent a little over a month after Ms Higgins went public with her 強姦 主張s gloated about the couple's status の中で the nation's political movers and shakers

Mr Sharaz was also very pleased to be 招待するd to a Brisbane tea hosted by former Labor 首相 Kevin Rudd

'No-one had any knowledge. How dare you!' It's all about 保護するing yourself,' was 上院議員 Gallagher's 返答.

However,?Mr Sharaz's 漏れるd text messages from February 11, 2021, four days before Ms Higgins' interview broadcast, 明言する／公表する 上院議員 Gallagher was fully aware of the 主張s and was 'really 投資するd' in Ms Higgins' story.?

In the months に引き続いて the interview Mr Sharaz and Ms Higgins sent repeated texts about the 上級の Labor 政治家，政治屋s they were 新採用するing to 圧力（をかける） their （人命などを）奪う，主張するs, 含むing then 対立 leader Mr Albanese.?

On April 16, 2021 Mr Sharaz texted Ms Higgins 説: 'So Albo gave me his number ? he just （機の）カム in to do the breakfast show ? and says if you 会合，会う with Scomo to let him know and he'll 飛行機で行く to Canberra to be there if you want to 会合，会う with him too.'

Ms Higgins replied: 'For sure. I have no qualms 会合 with Albo.'

Just six days later, Mr Sharaz wrote: 'Friday 9am with Albo locked in at CPO. 詳細（に述べる）s to come… Tanya [Plibersek] too.'

When asked whether Ms Higgins approached him to help her 原因（となる）, Mr Albanese on Tuesday 簡単に said 'no'.?

Ms Plibersek has also 拒絶するd the （人命などを）奪う，主張するs.

It is understood Ms Higgins was furious with the then 総理大臣 Mr Morrison after 審理，公聴会 whispers his office had been 'backgrounding' against her.

Four days before Ms Higgins' 主張s went public Mr Sharaz wrote of how 上院議員 Gallagher (pictured) was 'really 投資するd' in the saga

'He's about to be f***ed over. Just wait. We've got him,' she wrote to Mr Sharaz on March 26, 2021.

Mr Sharaz also made a made 批判的な comments about Mr Morrison.

'I still hate the c...' he wrote.

On Thursday 対立 leader Peter Dutton 需要・要求するd Mr Albanese 'be honest' over his 取引 with Ms Higgins and Mr Sharaz.?

'The 総理大臣 明白に has to 前線 up and 供給する a true factual explanation of what's going on here because there are different accounts,' Mr Dutton told 2GB host Ray Hadley.

'Until we know the facts, we won't know the answers to all the questions that need to be answered and the 総理大臣 and others given different 声明s at different points.

'It seems that some of that may be 相反する now. So I think the 首相 just needs to be honest.'

上院議員 Reynolds (pictured with Scott Morrison in 2019) said she 計画（する）s to 旗 the 解決／入植地 to the new 連邦の anti-汚職 （売買）手数料，委託（する）／委員会／権限, 説 the 速度(を上げる） of the 過程 raises 関心s about 'fairness'.

Hadley 答える／応じるd: 'Either David Sharaz is lying or 誇張するing, or the PM is lying and so is Katy Gallagher ... these are the only two 選択s.'

演説（する）／住所ing the taxpayer-基金d payout awarded to Ms Higgins after just one day of 介入 会談 in December Mr Hadley said: 'It never happens in a 事柄 of hours before a 解決／入植地 can be reached and both parties are happy.'

'It's （疑いを）晴らす some people 港／避難所't been telling the truth,' Mr Dutton replied.

Ms Higgins 告訴するd the 連邦／共和国 for 補償（金） over her 主張s and how they were 扱うd for the 報告（する）／憶測d sum of $3million.

December's 解決／入植地 was 指定するd a confidential but in?February Ms Higgins 否定するd that she received $3million.?

上院議員 Reynolds on Wednesday said she 計画（する）s to 旗 the 解決／入植地 for 調査 by the new 連邦の anti-汚職?説 the 速度(を上げる） of the 過程 raises 関心s about 'fairness'.

The 上院議員 said the 速度(を上げる） of the 決定／判定勝ち（する） raises?'serious questions about how this 重要な sum of public money was 決定するd and 配分するd'.

上院議員 R eynolds, who was boss to both Mr Lehrmann and? Ms Higgins boss at the time of the 申し立てられた／疑わしい 強姦, （人命などを）奪う，主張するd?弁護士／代理人／検事-General 示す Dreyfus forbade her to make public comment on the 事例／患者 or …に出席する 介入 開会／開廷／会期s.

'I was 最初 認めるd 合法的な 援助 to defend the civil （人命などを）奪う，主張する made by Ms Higgins against me,' she said in a 声明.

総理大臣 Anthony Albanese (pictured) has ひどく 否定するd colluding with Ms Higgins while in 対立 to 'weaponise' the 告訴，告発s and 損失 Scott Morrison's 連立政権

'On 6 December 2022, I was advised that the 連邦／共和国 has a discretion to 支配（する）／統制する the 反対／詐欺d uct of my defence and that the 弁護士／代理人／検事-General had decided to 演習 that discretion.

'The result of this was that the 弁護士／代理人／検事-General did not want me to …に出席する the 介入 or make any public comments about the 介入 or the civil （人命などを）奪う，主張する made by Ms Higgins.'

Reynolds （人命などを）奪う，主張するd that Mr Dreyfus, 上院議員 Gallagher, and Mr Albanese, had a '可能性のある 衝突 of 利益／興味' based on their previous public 声明s about the 事柄.

On Thursday Mr Albanese 攻撃する，衝突する?支援する at the suggestions 上院議員 Gallagher has 行為／法令／行動するd in any way inappropriately over the 事柄 while again 否定するing any impropriety on his part.

'I have 絶対の 信用／信任 in 上院議員 Gallagher,' he said.

'I had not met Brittany Higgins until I met her 公然と - 公然と - on the same day that she met Scott Morrison.'

Mr Albanese 辞退するd to be drawn into questions about the 事例／患者 存在 referred to the 国家の Anti-汚職 （売買）手数料，委託（する）／委員会／権限, arguing as it was an 独立した・無所属 団体／死体 it would 不適切な for him to comment.

As reporters kept 解雇する／砲火／射撃ing more questions about Ms Higgins the 首相 削減（する） the 圧力（をかける） 会議／協議会 short, which was ーするつもりであるd to 焦点（を合わせる） on a new airport for western Sydney, and walked out.

It is not known who is 漏れるing the texts between Mr Shiraz and Ms Higgins, with 音声部の とじ込み／提出するs of 会合 they held with Channel 10 reporters and 生産者s also 存在 漏れるd.?

Sources have told マスコミ 出口s the 構成要素 was 含むd in 証拠 供給するd to defence lawyers, the ACT office of the Director of Public 起訴s 同様に as 調査／捜査するing police officers to 準備する for Mr Lehrmann's 犯罪の 事例／患者.

The 犯罪の 裁判，公判 last held in the ACT last October?was abandoned after a 陪審／陪審員団 member brought unauthorised 構成要素 to the 陪審／陪審員団 room.

A second 裁判，公判 was 始める，決める to go ahead in February but the ACT Director of Public 起訴s Shane Drumgold discontinued the 事柄 特記する／引用するing the '重要な and 容認できない' 危険 to Ms Higgins' mental health.

The 扱うing of the 事例／患者 by the Australian 連邦の Police and Department of Public 起訴s in now under review by an 独立した・無所属 調査.