Sadiq 旅宿泊所's TfL 収容する/認めるs it will refund plumber who was wrongly 軍隊d to 支払う/賃金 ULEZ 罰金s after workman fitted 私的な number plates on his 先頭s - にもかかわらず his 乗り物s 存在 compliant

  • Sam Reading, 32, said his 先頭s were 罰金d £15 when 運動ing through London
  • But the plumber's 乗り物s were only a few years old and were Ulez compliant

Sadiq 旅宿泊所's 輸送(する) for London has 認める it will refund a plumber who was wrongly 罰金d hundreds of 続けざまに猛撃するs in Ulez 告発(する),告訴(する)/料金s after he fitted personalised number plate?にもかかわらず all four 乗り物s 存在 compliant.?

Sam Reading, 32, who owns his own plumbing company, is 需要・要求するing a refund for the 罰金s after he bought four number plates that (一定の)期間d out the words 'gas 職業' for his (n)艦隊/(a)素早い of 先頭s to 促進する his 商売/仕事.?

He discovered that three of his four 先頭s were 存在 告発(する),告訴(する)/料金d a £15 (死傷者)数 every time they were driven through London にもかかわらず them only 存在 a few years old, racking up a £455 法案 in just one month.?

It turned out that the personalised number plates?GA52JOB, GA53JOB and GA58JOB had 初めは been made for 先頭s built between?2002 and 2008, which were automitically みなすd as 非,不,無-Ulez compliant.?

However, 輸送(する) for London had not updated its system to take into account that the number plates had been fitted to new cars and therefore wrongly 課すd Mr Reading with the 罰金s.?

Sam Reading, 32, who owns his own plumbing company, is demanding a refund for the fines after he bought four number plates that spelled out the words 'gas job' for his fleet of vans to promote his business

Sam Reading, 32, who owns his own plumbing company, is 需要・要求するing a refund for the 罰金s after he bought four number plates that (一定の)期間d out the words 'gas 職業' for his (n)艦隊/(a)素早い of 先頭s to 促進する his 商売/仕事

It turned out that the personalised number plates GA52JOB, GA53JOB and GA58JOB had originally been made for vans built between 2002 and 2008, which were automitically deemed as non-Ulez compliant

It turned out that the personalised number plates GA52JOB, GA53JOB and GA58JOB had 初めは been made for 先頭s built between 2002 and 2008, which were automitically みなすd as 非,不,無-Ulez compliant

Mr Reading told the Sunday Telegraph: 'When I was using 基準 plates they were 罰金. But, when I put the new personalised plates on in August we started getting the Ulez 告発(する),告訴(する)/料金s.

'I went on the TfL Ulez checker website and punched in the plates, which said they were compliant. But, I got £455 in autopay 告発(する),告訴(する)/料金s in just one month.

'It's as though they can't update the system or have the 科学(工学)技術 to keep up with 改正s.

'Ulez is codswallop. It's 簡単に a money-making 計画/陰謀 的ing the 運転者s.'?

Mr Reading later 証明するd to TfL?that all of the 乗り物s were 現実に Ulez compliant and therefore should not have been 告発(する),告訴(する)/料金d at all.?

A TfL 広報担当者 told the Telegraph that it has 'the 最新の data on 乗り物 同意/服従' and updates it system every four weeks.?

It 追加するd that on 'rare' occasions' drivers that 交換(する) out the number plates of their 乗り物s during this four week period will not be 登録(する)d as 非,不,無-compliant until the next system update.?

TfL said it is 'working on ways to 増加する the frequency of these updates' and?will refund Mr Reading for the 罰金s, によれば the Telegraph.?

This comes after hundreds of drivers were wrongly 攻撃する,衝突する with Ulez 告発(する),告訴(する)/料金s after a camera to catch 運転者s was put in the wrong place, 軍隊ing TfL bosses to 問題/発行する refunds to drivers.?

TfL put up a camera to catch drivers outside the Ulez 非難する 境界 on the junction of Old Redding and the A409, which separates Watford in Hertfordshire with Stanmore in North London.?

The camera was placed at the junction of Old Redding and the A409, which separates Watford in Hertfordshire and Stanmore in North London

The camera was placed at the junction of Old Redding and the A409, which separates Watford in Hertfordshire and Stanmore in North London

But this was 明らかにする/漏らすd to be outside the 資本/首都's Ultra Low 放出/発行s Zone.

The camera was put up when Sadiq 旅宿泊所's hated new 計画/陰謀 was 開始する,打ち上げるd on August 29, but has since been switched and moved - and drivers have been refunded since 輸送(する) 長,指導者s realised their embarrassing error.

Drivers have been 告発(する),告訴(する)/料金d the £12.50 Ulez 料金 - and some 脅すd with a £180 罰金 ? even though they have not 現実に entered the zone.

A TfL spokesperson said: 'We apologise for this error. Unfortunately this camera was incorrectly positioned and we are 緊急に 修正するing this.?

'It has been switched off and will only be active when it has been repositioned. We will be refunding any 告発(する),告訴(する)/料金s that were wrongly 問題/発行するd.'

The comments below have been 穏健なd in 前進する.

The 見解(をとる)s 表明するd in the contents above are those of our 使用者s and do not やむを得ず 反映する the 見解(をとる)s of MailOnline.

We are no longer 受託するing comments on this article.