The BBC today ǧ¤á¤ë it failed to ŬÀÚ¤Ë challenge Prince Harry's ¡Ê¿ÍÌ¿¤Ê¤É¤ò¡ËÃ¥¤¦¡¤¼çÄ¥¤¹¤ë he is the µ¾À·¼Ô of 'good old fashioned ÀßΩ stitch up', calling it a lapse in 'our usual high ÊÔ½¸¡Ê¼Ô¡Ë¤Î ´ð½às'.

The Duke of Sussex?also spoke of a 'pretty dark' ¶¦ËÅ theory where he appeared to ¼¨º¶¤¹¤ë shadowy ¿Íʪ¡¿»Ñ¡¿¿ô»ús want him dead in the bombshell interview given after he lost his London ¹çˡŪ¤Ê challenge on Friday.

A Îó¡¿Á椰¡¿Áûư has broken out over the BBC's own ¥Ë¥å¡¼¥¹ÊóÆ» of the Duke of Sussex's sit-É餫¤¹¡¿·âÄÆ¤¹¤ë with the ÊüÁ÷¼Ô, where he ¹¶·â¤¹¤ë¡¤¾×ÆÍ¤¹¤ë out at what he ¡Ê¿ÍÌ¿¤Ê¤É¤ò¡ËÃ¥¤¦¡¤¼çÄ¥¤¹¤ëd was an 'ÀßΩ stitch-up', ´Þ¤àing Buckingham Palace.

'We failed to ŬÀÚ¤Ë challenge this and other ¼çÄ¥s,' the BBC said on its À§Àµs and ²òÌÀs website today.

The BBC ǧ¤á¤ë it failed to È¿±Ç¤¹¤ë the À¼ÌÀs from Buckingham Palace and the H ome Office?in its ̵Àþ¤ÇÄÌ¿®¤¹¤ë 4 ¥Ë¥å¡¼¥¹ÊóÆ» of the interview on the morning afterwards.

Harry spoke to BBC News for 31 minutes on Friday after losing a Ë¡ÄºÛȽ½ê of ¹µÁÊ¡¤¾å¹ð challenge over his °ÂÁ´ ¼ê¤Ï¤º¡¿½àÈ÷ while in the UK.

¾åµé¤Î ºÛȽ´±s upheld two previous ·èÄ꡿ȽÄ꾡¤Á¡Ê¤¹¤ë¡Ës that the (n)Ìò°÷¡¿(a)¼¹¹ÔÎϤΤ¢¤ë °Ñ°÷²ñ for the Êݸî of ²¦Â² and Public ¿Íʪ¡¿»Ñ¡¿¿ô»ús, known as Ravec, had ¹Ô°Ù¡¿Ë¡Îá¡¿¹Ôư¤¹¤ëd ¹çË¡¤Î in ¿½¤·¹þ¤à¡¿¿½¤·½Ðing him a special 'bespoke' °ÂÁ´ °ì³ç, leaving Harry with an ³µ»»¤Î ¡ò1.5million ¹çˡŪ¤Ê Ë¡°Æ.

On Saturday, BBC ̵Àþ¤ÇÄÌ¿®¤¹¤ë 4's Today programme covered the duke ½Ò¤Ù¤ëing his Ë¡ÄºÛȽ½ê ÇÔËÌ¡¦É餫¤¹ as a 'good old-fashioned ÀßΩ stitch-up'. And there was then an interview with ¤Î¶á¤¯¤Ë Êݸî ÀìÌç²È Richard Aitch, where Harry's 'stitch-up' ¡Ê¿ÍÌ¿¤Ê¤É¤ò¡ËÃ¥¤¦¡¤¼çÄ¥¤¹¤ës were 'repeated', the ÊüÁ÷¼Ô said.

'This »öÎã¡¿´µ¼Ô is ºÇ½ªÅª¤Ë the ÀÕǤ¡¿µÁ̳ of the Home Office and we should have È¿±Ç¤¹¤ëd their À¼ÌÀ', the BBC said today.

Prince Harry said on Friday night after his court defeat: ¡ÈI have had it described to me, once people knew about the facts, that this is a good old-fashioned establishment stitch-up, and that is what it feels like.¡É

Prince Harry said on Friday night after his Ë¡ÄºÛȽ½ê ÇÔËÌ¡¦É餫¤¹: ¡ÈI have had it ½Ò¤Ù¤ëd to me, once people knew about the facts, that this is a good old-fashioned ÀßΩ stitch-up, and that is what it feels like.¡ É

The BBC has had to post a clarification over its coverage, admitting it failed to properly?challenge some of his claims

The BBC has had to Ãϰ̡¤Ç¤Ì¿¤¹¤ë a ²òÌÀ over its ¥Ë¥å¡¼¥¹ÊóÆ», admitting it failed to ŬÀÚ¤Ë?challenge some of his ¡Ê¿ÍÌ¿¤Ê¤É¤ò¡ËÃ¥¤¦¡¤¼çÄ¥¤¹¤ës

The ²ñ¼Ò¡¿ÃÄÂÎ also said the programme 'should have given the ¸«²ò¡Ê¤ò¤È¤ë¡Ë of Buckingham Palace', and 'this was a lapse in our usual high ÊÔ½¸¡Ê¼Ô¡Ë¤Î ´ð½às'.

The Home Office said: 'We are pleased that the Ë¡ÄºÛȽ½ê has ÀßΩ¤¹¤ë in favour of the À¯ÉÜ's position in this »öÎã¡¿´µ¼Ô.

'The UK À¯ÉÜ's Êݸî¤Î °ÂÁ´ system is rigorous and proportionate. It is our long-standing À¯ºö not to ¶¡µë¤¹¤ë ¾ÜºÙ¡Ê¤Ë½Ò¤Ù¤ë¡Ëd ¡Ê·Ù»¡¤Ê¤É¤Ø¤Î¡ËÌ©¹ð¡¤¹ðÁʡʾõ¡Ë on those ¼ê¤Ï¤º¡¿½àÈ÷, as doing so could ÂŶ¨ their ÀµÄ¾¤µ and ±Æ¶Á¤¹¤ë¡¿´¶¾ð individuals' °ÂÁ´.'

In ÊÖÅú to the failed ¹çˡŪ¤Ê challenge, a Buckingham Palace spokesperson said: 'All of these ÌäÂ꡿ȯ¹Ô¤¹¤ës have been ¿Ç»¡¤¹¤ëd ·«¤êÊÖ¤·¤Æ and meticulously by the Ë¡ÄºÛȽ½ês, with the same ·ëÏÀ reached on each occasion.'

During the Today interview, Mr Aitch, who is director of Áàºî¡¿¼ê½Ñs at °ÂÁ´ services company Mobius International, said he 'was shocked but certainly not surprised' at the judgment.

He ¡Ê¿ÍÌ¿¤Ê¤É¤ò¡ËÃ¥¤¦¡¤¼çÄ¥¤¹¤ëd that the '½àÈ÷¡¿¾ò¹à of Êݸî should not be based on ¹çˡŪ¤Ê argument', but on ººÄ꡿ɾ²Á of '´í¸± and ¶¼¤· against Harry', and agreed that it had been 'a 'stitch-up'.

The clarification on the BBC website over its Prince Harry coverage

The ²òÌÀ on the BBC website over its Prince Harry ¥Ë¥å¡¼¥¹ÊóÆ»

Meghan posted a photo in an apparent show of support for Harry in the aftermath of his bombshell interview

Megha n Ãϰ̡¤Ç¤Ì¿¤¹¤ëd a photo in an ÌÀ¤é¤«¤Ê show of support for Harry in the ±Æ¶Á of his bombshell interview

Ãϰ̡¤Ç¤Ì¿¤¹¤ëing on X after the BBC ²òÌÀ, Mr Aitch said: 'There should not be any need to apologise @BBCNews for opinion based interviews.

'Absence of a ¶¼¤· and ´í¸± ººÄ꡿ɾ²Á on Prince Harry where the ¾ÇÅÀ¡Ê¤ò¹ç¤ï¤»¤ë¡Ë is on ¹çˡŪ¤Ê ²áÄø ±Æ¶Á¡ÊÎÏ¡Ëd by the ¿äÁ¦s of a °Ñ°÷²ñ that is not ÆÈΩ¤·¤¿¡¦Ìµ½ê°, it defines "stitch up".'

Harry's interview continues to ¸¶°ø¡Ê¤È¤Ê¤ë¡Ë a major ư¤«¤¹.

At one point he was asked about his mother's death

'How does that make you feel, given you have ɽÌÀ¤¹¤ëd Èó¾ï¤Ë¡¿Â¿¿ô¤Î times that you do not want history to repeat itself?', the interviewer asked.

Harry then replied: 'Yes, I don't want history to repeat itself. I think there's a lot of other people out there, the Âç¿¿ô, that also don't want history to repeat itself. But through the ¸øÉ½¡¤Ë½Ïª ²áÄø, I've discovered that some people do want history to repeat itself, which is pretty dark.'

He went on: 'I'm not going to ³ô that at this point. I know all the »ØÌ¾¤¹¤ës of the people that were ȼ¤¦¡¿´Ø¤ï¤ëd in this ²áÄø'.

Ken Wharfe, who was a ²¦¼¼¤Î Êݸî officer to ²¦¼¼¤Îs ´Þ¤àing Harry, William and their mother, Diana, Princess of ¤à¤Á¤ÎÀ×s, believes the duke has 'played the wrong card' regarding his °ÂÁ´.

Harry cannot ¿äÄꤹ¤ë¡¿Í½ÁÛ¤¹¤ë the 'all-singing-and-dancing Êݸî that you had when you were in the ÉôÂâd Kingdom' and was a working member of the ²¦¼¼¤Î family, like his father, the King, and his brother, the Prince of ¤à¤Á¤ÎÀ×s, ¤Ë¤è¤ì¤Ð Mr Wharfe.

He now needs to show some 'humility' if he wants to begin ²ñÃÌ with his UK family, along with the À¯ÉÜ and police, to try and ²þÁ±¤¹¤ë his °ÂÁ´.

Harry told the BBC that he wanted reconciliation with his family but hinted that he may not be willing to bring his wife and children to the UK without better security

Harry told the BBC that he ¼êÇÛÃæ¤Î¡¤¤ª¿Ò¤Í¼Ô Ã群ê with his family but hinted that he may not be willing to bring his wife and children to the UK without better °ÂÁ´?

Harry has called for the Home Ĺ´± to review the ÃÄÂΡ¿»àÂÎ that authorises Êݸî for ¾åµé¤Î ²¦¼¼¤Îs after he lost a Ë¡ÄºÛȽ½ê of ¹µÁÊ¡¤¾å¹ð challenge over his °ÂÁ´ ¼ê¤Ï¤º¡¿½àÈ÷ while in the UK.

It Ͷȯ¤¹¤ëd him to tell the BBC in an interview that he 'can't see a world in which I would be bringing my wife and children »Ù±ç¤¹¤ë to the UK'.

Mr Wharfe said: 'On the °ÂÁ´ ÌäÂ꡿ȯ¹Ô¤¹¤ë, I think he has really played the wrong card.

'I don't see how he can ¿äÄꤹ¤ë¡¿Í½ÁÛ¤¹¤ë to get ½½Ê¬¤Ê Êݸî when he arrived »Ù±ç¤¹¤ë in the UK, when he is no longer a member working the ²¦¼¼¤Î family, when he knows that the actual °ÂÁ´ °ì³ç comes at the expense of the British taxpayer.

'The À¯ÉÜ and the police are ¤ä¤á¤ë together on this.

'They are Àâ, "°æ¸Í¡¿ÊÛ¸î»ÎÀÊ, we understand that, but we can't suddenly just ²¡¤·¿Ê¤á¤ë on buttons to give you the all-singing-and-dancing Êݸî that you had when you were in ÉôÂâd Kingdom," the same that his mother had, his brother enjoys, and now it is, of course, his father and Queen Camilla.

'What the À¯ÉÜ has given and the police is a Êݸî of sorts to ÊÝ¾Ú¡Ê¿Í¡Ë his safety, which will be based on ´í¸± ººÄ꡿ɾ²Á that, ¤ä¤á¤ë Ψľ¤Ë, is about the best he can ¿äÄꤹ¤ë¡¿Í½ÁÛ¤¹¤ë.

'The High Ë¡ÄºÛȽ½ê has seen that. The ¹µÁÊ¡¤¾å¹ð Ë¡ÄºÛȽ½ê has seen it. The À¯ÉÜ has seen it. The police have seen it - so where's the problem?'

'¤¹¤ë¸¢Íø¤òÍ¿¤¨¤ëd' Prince Harry chose to walk away from public µÁ̳ and his continuing ¼ûÍס¦Í׵᤹¤ës for °ìÏ¢¤Î²ñµÄ¡¢¸ò¾Ä¡¿´°À®¤¹¤ë-the-clock police Êݸî should not be entertained ¤½¤Î¾å¤Î, the ±Æ¤ò¤Ä¤¯¤ë¡¿Èø¹Ô¤¹¤ë Home Ĺ´± said last night.

It comes as his wife, Meghan, pointedly Ãϰ̡¤Ç¤Ì¿¤¹¤ëd a photograph of Harry with his two children in the garden of their California home, just hours after the prince said his 'ÇËÌÇŪ¤Ê' loss in the Ë¡ÄºÛȽ½ê of ¹µÁÊ¡¤¾å¹ð meant that his family could never return to the UK.

MP Chris Philp told the Mail last night that the À¯ÉÜ 'has more °µÎϡʤò¤«¤±¤ë¡Ëing ´Ø¿´s' than to ƶ·ê in to the prince's ¼ûÍס¦Í׵᤹¤ës that Home Ĺ´± Yvette Cooper now Ä´ºº¡¿Áܺº¤¹¤ë his »öÎã¡¿´µ¼Ô and Ravec.

The comments below have not been ²º·ò¤Êd.

The ¸«²ò¡Ê¤ò¤È¤ë¡Ës ɽÌÀ¤¹¤ëd in the contents above are those of our »ÈÍѼÔs and do not ¤ä¤à¤òÆÀ¤º È¿±Ç¤¹¤ë the ¸«²ò¡Ê¤ò¤È¤ë¡Ës of MailOnline.

By Ãϰ̡¤Ç¤Ì¿¤¹¤ëing your comment you agree to our house »ÙÇÛ¤¹¤ës.