法廷，裁判所 拒絶するs Blunkett 亡命 法律 企て，努力，提案

The 法廷，裁判所 of 控訴，上告 today 拒絶するd a 企て，努力，提案 by the Home 長官 to overturn a High 法廷，裁判所 決定／判定勝ち（する） 脅すing his 堅い new 政策 of 否定するing food and accommodation to late applicants for 亡命.

David Blunkett had challenged Mr 司法（官） Collins's 高度に 議論の的になる 結論 in six 実験（する） 事例／患者s that the new 支配するs had resulted in 違反s of the European 条約 on Human 権利s.

Mr Blunkett said in a 声明 that he was "very pleased" the 裁判官s had 支援するd the "重要な 原則" of his 法律制定.

But human 権利s groups said the 法廷，裁判所 判決，裁定 left the Home 長官's 政策 "in tatters".

In each of the six 事例／患者s, would-be 難民s were

辞退するd 明言する／公表する help while their （人命などを）奪う，主張するs were 過程d because they had failed to 適用する for 亡命 at the port of 入ること／参加（者）, or as soon as reasonably practicable.

政府 lawyers said the "本気で 欠陥d" 決定／判定勝ち（する） had made the deliberately 厳しい new 支配するs, introduced in January, "unworkable".

Mr Blunkett's QC David Pannick told Lord Phillips, Master of the Rolls, sitting with two other 上級の 裁判官s, that he would not be 捜し出すing to 控訴，上告 その上の to the House of Lords.

Mr Pannick said the Home 長官 was now changing 手続きs - "the changes, of course, will be 従うing with your lordship's judgment".

Lord Phillips said: "We 解任する these 控訴，上告s because Mr 司法（官） Collins was 訂正する to 結論する that each of the six 決定／判定勝ち（する）s under consideration was vitiated as a result of 欠陥／不足s in the 手続き.

"We were told by the 司法長官 that these 手続きs are 存在 radically 精密検査するd.

"When they have been put in order we can see no 推論する／理由 why (the new 規則s) should not operate 効果的に."

Lord Phillips said those who had recently arrived by 空気／公表する would have to 満足させる 移民／移住 公式の／役人s that they had good 推論する／理由 not to （人命などを）奪う，主張する 亡命 at the port of arrival.

"If they do so they will be likely to receive support," he said.

"If they do not, the 国務長官 will have

to consider whether their vulnerability is such that it is necessary to 認める them support ーするために 避ける the 違反 of their 権利s (under the human 権利s 法律s)."

Mr Blunkett said in a 声明: "This will enable the 政府 to operate a fair but 強健な 亡命 support system for which 議会 立法者d last year.

"We have already made changes to our 手続きs to 確実にする that individual 事例／患者s get 十分な and fair consideration.

"But it was the 重要な 原則 that was at 火刑／賭ける here and on this we won."

He 追加するd: "This 判決，裁定 支持するs the 見解（をとる）, passed by 議会, that it's 完全に reasonable to 推定する／予想する people 逃げるing from 迫害 to （人命などを）奪う，主張する 亡命 as soon as reasonably practicable.

"It also 確実にするs we're able to 効果的に operate our 改革（する）s on the ground."

示す Littlewood, of civil 権利s group Liberty, said the "破滅的な 敗北・負かす" for Mr Blunkett meant the 政策 of 否定するing 亡命 探検者s 福利事業 or the 権利 to work "lies in tatters".

"This cannot be considered a victory for the Home 長官. He managed to operate his 政策 for a month and 10 days.

"The 緊急 system 課すd after our 介入 on February 19 is, 効果的に, made 永久の by this 判決，裁定.

"The 法廷，裁判所 of 控訴，上告 has 支配するd that 否定するing 亡命 探検者s support and the 権利 to work would 量 to degrading 治療 under the European 条約 on Human 権利s."

He 追加するd: "We think it is reasonable to 推定する／予想する 亡命 （人命などを）奪う，主張するs to be made as soon as reasonably practicable but there were factors the 政府 was not considering, which 軍隊d people into destitution.

"The 操作／手術 of the 法律 is now going to be much fairer - it will have to be made 両立できる with the human 権利s 条約."

Habib Rahman, 長，指導者 (n)役員／(a)執行力のある of the 共同の 会議 for the 福利事業 of 移民，移住（する）s, said: "This 決定／判定勝ち（する） 代表するs victory for the basic 原則s of humanity and compassion which the UK has 歴史的に ext ended to all those who are here.

"The 政府 should now 認める that it cannot 妥協 the basic 権利s of 亡命 探検者s 簡単に to 達成する political 的s and to 阻止する them from coming to the UK."

The new 亡命 法律s were designed to stop people 老年の over 18 entering the UK as students or on work ビザs - months or even years ago - using 亡命 使用／適用s as a 装置 to 延長する their stay in Britain.

But human 権利s groups （刑事）被告 the 政府 of going too far and 不公平に 支配するing 攻撃を受けやすい people to destitution which could 軍隊 them into 罪，犯罪 and 売春.

Mr 司法（官） Collins 結論するd there was a real 危険 of the six 苦しむing 残忍な and degrading 治療.

They were J, who was 逃げるing Iran; F and D from Angola; M from Rwanda; B from Ethiopia; and Q from Iraq.

Mr Blunkett had 反応するd furiously to the High 法廷，裁判所 judgment, 説: "率直に, I'm fed up with having to を取り引きする a 状況／情勢 where 議会 審議s 問題／発行するs and the 裁判官s overturn them."

The 判決，裁定 and Mr Blunkett's comments 誘発するd a 国家の 審議 and マスコミ attacks on the 裁判官s, who were lambasted in some ４半期/4分の1s as "独裁者s in wigs".

現在のing the Home 長官's 事例／患者, 司法長官 Lord Goldsmith argued that Mr 司法（官） Collins had made "many errors of 法律" and the 影響 of his 判決，裁定 was to 失望させる the will of 議会.

But Nicholas Blake QC, appearing for the six, argued that 亡命 探検者s were する権利を与えるd to the 保護 of the human 権利s 条約 because of a "real 危険" of them 苦しむing 残忍な and degrading 治療.

影をつくる／尾行する home 長官 Oliver Letwin said "合法的な 不確定" in the wake of the judgment 確認するd his 見解（をとる） that the entire 亡命 system should be scrapped and 取って代わるd with a 割当 of

本物の 難民s.