Man 告訴するs 護衛する 機関 after (人命などを)奪う,主張するing he was stood up after 支払う/賃金ing millions for '性の services' with actresses and supermodels like Megan Fox and?Candice Swanepoel

  • Yu 'ツバメ' Xu 主張するs he paid for '性の services' from A-名簿(に載せる)/表(にあげる) celebrities??
  • The 実業家 said he paid $3.7 million to 王室の 法廷,裁判所 護衛するs, Sydney
  • He had ーするつもりであるd to 会合,会う Megan Fox, Candice Swanepoel and?Angelababy
  • Mr Xu said the 機関 stood him up and he never met with the women?
  • He has now 開始する,打ち上げるd 合法的な 活動/戦闘 in an 試みる/企てる to 回復する the costs

A Chinese 実業家 (人命などを)奪う,主張するs he paid an 護衛する 機関 $3.7 million to have sex with supermodels and A-名簿(に載せる)/表(にあげる) actresses.

Yu 'ツバメ' Xu 主張するs he paid Sydney-based 機関 王室の 法廷,裁判所 護衛する for '性の services' from Hollywood actress Megan Fox, Victoria's Secret model Candice Swanepoel and Independence Day actress Angelababy but was stood up.?

Mr Xu said an スパイ/執行官 told him that the 機関 would 供給する '女性(の) 護衛するs of international standing for the 準備/条項 of 性の services', によれば 文書s とじ込み/提出するd in the NSW 最高裁判所.?

A Chinese businessman claims he paid a Sydney-based agency Royal Court Escorts $3.7 million to have sex with supermodels and A-list actresses

A Chinese 実業家 (人命などを)奪う,主張するs he paid a Sydney-based 機関 王室の 法廷,裁判所 護衛するs $3.7 million to have sex with supermodels and A-名簿(に載せる)/表(にあげる) actresses

The court documents refer to Hollywood actress Megan Fox, Victoria's Secret model Candice Swanepoel (pictured) and Independence Day actress Angelababy, but it is not suggested the women are escorts
Yu 'Martin' Xu alleges he paid Sydney-based Royal Court Escort for 'sexual services' from celebrities, but the agency stood him up and 'the person was not provided'

The 法廷,裁判所 文書s 言及する to Hollywood actress Megan Fox (権利), Victoria's Secret model Candice Swanepoel (left) and Independence Day actress Angelababy, but it is not 示唆するd the wome n are 護衛するs

He said the company agreed to 容易にする the 会合 anywhere in the world if he paid $3.7 million, 同様に as the costs of 輸送(する) and accommodation.??

'It was agreed that if (Mr Xu) paid the sum of $3.7 million (the 機関) would 供給する Megan Fox, Candice Swanepoel and 'Angelababy' as 護衛するs for 性の services,' Mr Xu's 声明 of (人命などを)奪う,主張する said.?

Mr Xu then 主張するs the 機関 stood him up, and にもかかわらず making the 支払い(額)s he never met with the A-listers.

There is no suggestion that Megan Fox, Candice Swanepoel or Angelababy are 護衛するs.?

Mr Xu alleges that the agency stood him up, and despite the payments he never met with the A-listers

Mr Xu 主張するs that the 機関 stood him up, and にもかかわらず the 支払い(額)s he never met with the A-listers

He 開始する,打ち上げるd 合法的な 活動/戦闘 against the parent company of 王室の 法廷,裁判所 護衛するs in an 成果/努力 to 回復する the $3.724 million he (人命などを)奪う,主張するs to have paid.

To 接近 the services Mr Xu paid the 機関 a $24,000 'joining 料金', he (人命などを)奪う,主張するd in 法廷,裁判所 文書s.

After another 支払い(額) to the 機関 in July 2014, he paid a その上の $500,000 on August 13, 2014, 法廷,裁判所 文書s said.

Another $500,000 支払い(額) was made two days later, with two more 支払い(額)s totaling $2.5 million on August 19, the 文書s said.?

Mr Xu's statement of claim said 'It was agreed that if he ?paid the sum of $3.7 million the agency would provide Megan Fox, Candice Swanepoel and 'Angelababy' as escorts for sexual services

Mr Xu's 声明 of (人命などを)奪う,主張する said 'It was agreed that if he ?paid the sum of $3.7 million the 機関 would 供給する Megan Fox, Candice Swanepoel and 'Angelababy' as 護衛するs for 性の services

In court documents?In court documents

Mr Xu claimsthat the 機関 agreed to send Angelababy (pictured) in September 2014 but the 申し立てられた/疑わしい rendezvous fell through when 'the person was not 供給するd'

A final 支払い(額) of $200,000 was transferred on August 21.

In his 声明 of (人命などを)奪う,主張する, Mr Xu 主張するs that he had organised to 会合,会う with 27-year-old model, singer and actress Angelababy, who recently starred in Independence Day: Resurgence.

Mr Xu says that the 機関 agreed to send Angelababy in September 2014 but the 申し立てられた/疑わしい rendezvous fell through when 'the person was not 供給するd.'

It is understood the parent company of 王室の 法廷,裁判所 護衛するs, Nalwa Holdings, will defend the (人命などを)奪う,主張する but they have yet to とじ込み/提出する a defence 声明 with the 法廷,裁判所.

?

The comments below have been 穏健なd in 前進する.

The 見解(をとる)s 表明するd in the contents above are those of our 使用者s and do not やむを得ず 反映する the 見解(をとる)s of MailOnline.

We are no longer 受託するing comments on this article.