Migrants （不足などを）補う eight in ten new 世帯s over the past 15 years, new 人物／姿／数字s 明らかにする／漏らす

  • New 報告（する）／憶測 from 移住 Watch 告発する／非難するs 大臣s of 誤って導くing the public?
  • Comes after Communities 長官 said that 'two thirds of 住宅 需要・要求する has nothing to do with 移民／移住'
  • But 移住 Watch said that this was '完全に 誤った and 誤って導くing' the public?

By STEVE DOUGHTY SOCIAL AFFAIRS CORRESPONDENT FOR THE DAILY MAIL

Published: | Updated:

Migration watch say Mr Javi's claim that two-thirds of housing demand had 'nothing to do with immigration' is 'false and misleading'

移住 watch say Mr Javi's （人命などを）奪う，主張する that two-thirds of 住宅 需要・要求する had 'nothing to do with 移民／移住' is '誤った and 誤って導くing'

The spiralling need for new homes is almost 完全に a result of 移民／移住, によれば a 報告（する）／憶測.

It says eight out of ten of all new 世帯s over the past 15 years were made up of migrant families, which is the 圧倒的な 推論する／理由 for the 圧力 to build millions of new homes.

The 報告（する）／憶測 from the 移住 Watch UK think-戦車／タンク （刑事）被告 大臣s of 誤って導くing the public.?

Communities 長官 Sajid Javid told the ありふれたs in February that ‘two-thirds of 住宅 需要・要求する has nothing to do with 移民／移住’ and was 負かす／撃墜する to natural 全住民 growth.?

移住 Watch says this is ‘完全に 誤った and 誤って導くing’.

It says that によれば the 労働 軍隊 調査する by the Office for 国家の 統計（学）, 1.65 million of the two million new 世帯s needing homes in England between 2000 and 2015 were 長，率いるd by someone who was an 移民，移住（する）.

And between 2010 and 2015, the number of 世帯s 長，率いるd by someone born in Britain 現実に fell.?

It dropped by 117,335 to 18,751,065, while the number of new 世帯s where the 長，率いる was an 移民，移住（する） went up by nearly half a million to 3,493,207.

Mr Javid’s Department for Communities and 地元の 政府 says that in the 25 years between 2014 and 2039 there will need to be homes for 210,000 new 世帯s a year. Of these, it says 77,000, will be a result of 移民／移住.

HOMES SHORTAGE? BUILD ON THE ROOFTOPS?

London's chronic 住宅 不足 could be solved by building on rooftops, a 報告（する）／憶測 示唆するs. It says 23,000 封鎖するs could be 延長するd 上向き without altering 見解（をとる）s of the 資本／首都’s historic skyline.

Knight Frank used mapping ソフトウェア called Skyward to 明らかにする／漏らす where extra 床に打ち倒すs could go up in the centre of the city.

The 広い地所 機関 （人命などを）奪う，主張するs 41,000 homes could be created ? the 同等（の） of more than 437 football pitches together covering 28million sq ft. If developed, the space would be 価値（がある） as much as £51billion.

Charles Dugdale of Knight Frank said: ‘Skyward is a fantastically powerful 道具 for identifying 開発 適切な時期s to 打ち明ける thousands of new homes in London and 緩和する 住宅 供給（する） 圧力s, 特に in those areas where availability of land is becomi ng ますます rare.’

宣伝

But 移住 Watch 論争s these numbers.?

It says 公式の／役人s are using 移民／移住 人物／姿／数字s that are far below the real levels and ignoring the 影響 of new families formed by young 移民，移住（する）s already in the UK.

‘Consider eight ポーランドの（人） men in their twenties who arrived in England in 2012 and live together in a 株d house,’ the 報告（する）／憶測 said.?

Between 2010 and 2015, the number of households headed by someone born in Britain?dropped by 117,335 to 18,751,065, while the number of new households where the head was an immigrant went up by nearly half a million to 3,493,207

Between 2010 and 2015, the number of 世帯s 長，率いるd by someone born in Britain?dropped by 117,335 to 18,751,065, while the number of new 世帯s where the 長，率いる was an 移民，移住（する） went up by nearly half a million to 3,493,207

‘Together they 現在／一般に form one 世帯. However, as they age and perhaps settle 負かす／撃墜する with partners and have children they will go on to form up to eight separate family 世帯s.’

移住 Watch 長，指導者 Lord Green said: ‘We have a major 危機 over 住宅 影響する／感情ing 抱擁する numbers of people, 特に the young.?

'Yet the 焦点（を合わせる） of 審議 is still on 供給（する）; nobody dares talk about 需要・要求する and its 原則 driver, 移民／移住.

‘Our paper breaks new ground in pointing to this central, if uncomfortable, truth.’

Migrant 危機

Most watched News ビデオs

Comments 1768

株 what you think

  見解（をとる） all

The comments below have not been 穏健なd.

  見解（をとる） all

The 見解（をとる）s 表明するd in the contents above are those of our 使用者s and do not やむを得ず 反映する the 見解（をとる）s of MailOnline.

We are no longer 受託するing comments on this article.