Heather Mills 手配中の，お尋ね者 staggering 離婚 解決／入植地 of £3.25million A YEAR from Macca

Heather Mills 手配中の，お尋ね者 a staggering £3.25million a year from ex-husband Sir Paul McCartney, it 現れるd today.

The 驚くべき／特命の／臨時の 人物／姿／数字 量d to a lump sum of almost £100million which she （人命などを）奪う，主張するd she needed for living costs, 安全 expenses and to look after their daughter Beatrice, four.

But にもかかわらず her 需要・要求するs, Mr 司法（官） Bennett 支配するd she should have a total of £24.5million, a still かなりの chunk of the former Beatle's fortune.

Scroll 負かす／撃墜する for more ...

Together: But the McCartneys' marriage ended in a bitter 離婚 with Heather Mills 需要・要求するing £3.25million a year off her ex-husband

同様に as the £100million lump sum, 行方不明になる Mills had 手配中の，お尋ね者 a その上の £8million to £12.5million for a home in London, £3million for a house in New York and £500,000 for an office in Brighton for her sister Fiona.

The cash 解決／入植地 would have 含むd £500,000 for holidays, much of which would have gone に向かって 借り切る／憲章ing 私的な flights and 飛行機で行くing first class.

She also asked to 保持する her 所有物／資産／財産s in Robertsbridge, East Sussex and Hove.

In 新規加入 to giving 行方不明になる Mills a far smaller 解決／入植地 than she 手配中の，お尋ね者, Mr 司法（官） Bennett 拒絶するd her （人命などを）奪う，主張するs about her own 財政上の status and 特記する／引用するs her 失敗 to 供給する any 文書の 証拠 of her 申し立てられた／疑わしい 収入s.

He says: "I have to say I cannot 受託する the wife's 事例／患者 that she was 豊富な and 独立した・無所属 by the time she met the husband in the middle of 1999.

"Her problem 茎・取り除くs from the 欠如（する） of any 文書の evid ence to support her 事例／患者 as to the level of her 収入s...

"I do not 疑問 that she modelled 首尾よく and was a public （衆議院の）議長. But the 調査 in this 事例／患者 of her 資産s and 収入s as at 1999 when the parties met do not 耐える out her 事例／患者.

"The penthouse flat in Denman Street was not 価値（がある） £500,000 in 1999. She sold it on 20 March 2001 for £385,000 after the London 所有物／資産／財産 market had risen 大幅に since 1999.

"She did not in 1999 own the 所有物／資産／財産 in Cross Street in Brighton. That was not bought until March 2000 when she gave up her 所有物／資産／財産 近づく King's Somborne in Hampshire.

"During her cross-examination she 主張するd for the first time that in 新規加入 to 所有物／資産／財産 資産s she had £2m-£3m in the bank. No について言及する of such 資産s was made in her affidavit.

"There is no 文書の 証拠 to support that 主張. During the 審理，公聴会 she was asked 繰り返して to produce bank 声明s, which she said she thought she had in Brighton, to 立証する this （人命などを）奪う，主張する. No bank 声明s were ever produced.

"The first 税金 return that the wife has been able to produce is for the year ending 5 April 1999. The 歳入 has not been able to 供給（する） any 事前の 税金 return.

"However her 税金 returns for the years ending 5 April 1999 and thereafter to 2006 are in the papers. Her 甚だしい／１２ダース turnover and 逮捕する 利益（をあげる） 宣言するd for “事実上の／代理, modelling and public speaking” for the 税金 years 1999 to 2002 are, それぞれ (to the nearest £500) £62,000 and £11,500; £42,000 and £6000; £112,000 and £58,000; and £78,000 and £49,500.

"Thus her 税金 returns for 1999 and 2000 do not support the wife's 事例／患者 of very 重要な 収入s as 始める，決める out in her affidavit."