#OscarsSoBoring: 学院 Awards ratings 攻撃する,衝突する a new low as テレビ視聴者s complain about 'predicable' 儀式 and 'unfunny' host Jimmy Kimmel

  • Sunday night's Oscars were watched in 18.9 per cent of American 世帯s??
  • That's the second lowest 率ing in the award 儀式's history behind 2007 when Jon Stewart ?hosted the event
  • It also had a total viewership of just 26.5 million - the first time on 記録,記録的な/記録する the Oscars reached より小数の than 30 million people?
  • Many on social マスコミ complained about this year's host, Jimmy Kimmel, 存在 'unfunny' and the 勝利者s 'predictable'??

In light of the #MeToo movement and last year's Best Picture mix-up, Americans should have been tuning in 一団となって/一緒に to see what new 演劇 the 学院 Awards had in 蓄える/店 Sunday night.?

Surprisingly, the Oscars hosted by Jimmy Kimmel?didn't see a 上げる in ratings but instead 攻撃する,衝突する a new low.

によれば Nielson, the show?was watched in 18.9 per cent of 世帯s with a total viewership of 26.5 million - the first time on 記録,記録的な/記録する the Oscars reached より小数の than 30 million people.?

The Academy Awards were watched in just 18.9 per cent of households on Sunday - a new low for the ceremony?

The 学院 Awards were watched in just 18.9 per cent of 世帯s on Sunday - a new low for the 儀式?

The awards were second only to Jon Stewart's show in 2007 for low ratings?

The awards were second only to Jon Stewart's show in 2007 for low ratings?

That's about a 20 per cent 減少(する) from last year, when Kimmel hosted the awards for the first time.?

Kimmel was given the gig again after last year's 儀式 was marred by the wrong 勝利者 存在 発表するd for Best Picture.?

An (n)役員/(a)執行力のある from accounting 会社/堅い PricewaterhouseCoopers, who 一覧表にする the 投票(する)s every year, 手渡すd out the wrong envelope to presenters 過密な住居 Beatty and 妖精/密着させる Dunaway, resulting in La La Land incorrectly 存在 発表するd as the 勝利者 over Moonlight.?

The Oscars are often the most-watched TV show after the 最高の Bowl. Not this time: the 開会式 of the Winter Olympics last month was seen by 27.8 million.

Television viewership in general is 拒絶する/低下するing, but Oscar ratings are often tied to the 人気 of the movies that are celebrating, and this doesn't say much for 'The 形態/調整 of Water,' which won best picture on Sunday night.

Many on social media complained about the show being predictable and boring

Many on social マスコミ complained about the show 存在 predictable and boring

This year continues a downtrend in ratings for the awards - considered the highest 栄誉(を受ける) in the 商売/仕事.?

Ever since Ellen DeGeneres hosted in 2013, the awards have been raking in より小数の and より小数の テレビ視聴者s.

During Sunday night's awards, many on social マスコミ complained that the show was boring and predictable.?

Some 非難するd it on an 'unfunny' Kimmel - who did appear to steer (疑いを)晴らす from contro versial jokes in his monologue.

Others said the 儀式 was too predictable. Indeed, there were no real upsets in any of the major 部類s.??????

As usual, the show also ran long by about 50 minutes.??

OSCARS RATINGS THROUGHOUT THE YEARS?
YEAR?RATINGTOTAL VIEWERS (in millions)HOSTBEST PICTURE WINNER?
2017?18.926.5?Jimmy Kimmel?The 形態/調整 of Water?
2016?22.4?32.9Jimmy Kimmel?Moonlight?
2015?19.4?32.42?Chris 激しく揺する?スポットライト?
2014?20.6?37.26?Neil Patrick Harris?Birdman?
2013?24.7?43.74?Ellen Degeneres?12 Years A Slave?
2012?24.47?40.38?Seth MacFarlane?Argo?
2011?23.91?39.46?Billy 水晶?The Artist?
2010?21.2?37.9?Anne Hathaway and James フランス系カナダ人?The King's Speech?
2009?24.89?41.62?Alec Baldwin and Steve ツバメ?The 傷つける Locker?
2008?20.88?36.94Hugh Jackman?Slumdog Millionaire?
2007?18.7?31.7?Jon Stewart?No Country For Old Men?
2006?23.65?39.92?Ellen DeGeneres?The 出発/死d?
2005?22.91?38.64?Jon Stewart?衝突,墜落?
2004?25.29?42.16?Chris 激しく揺する?Million Dollar Baby?
2003?26.68?43.56?Billy 水晶?The Lord of the (犯罪の)一味s: The Return of the King?
2002?20.58?33.04?Steve ツバメ?Chicago?
2001?24.13?40.54?Whoopi Goldberg?A Beautiful Mind?
2000?25.86?42.93?Steve ツバメ?Gladiator?
1999?29.64?46.53?Billy 水晶?American Beauty?
1998?28.51?45.63?Billy 水晶?Shakespeare in Love?
1997?35.32?57.25?Whoopi Goldberg?Titanic?
1996?25.83?40.83?Billy 水晶?The English 患者?
1995?30.48?44.81?Whoopi Goldberg?Braveheart?
1994?33.47?48.87?David Letterman?Forrest Gump?
1993?31.86?46.26?Whoopi Goldberg?Shindler's 名簿(に載せる)/表(にあげる)?
1992?32.85?45.84?Billy 水晶?Unforgiven?
1991?29.84?44.44?Billy 水晶?The Silence of the Lambs?
1990?28.06?42.79?Billy 水晶?Dances with Wolves?
1989?26.42?40.22?Billy 水晶?運動ing 行方不明になる Daisy?
1988?28.41?42.77?非,不,無?Rain Man?
1987?27.80?42.04?Chevy Chase?The Last Emperor?
1986?25.94?39.72?Chevy Chase, Goldie Hawn and Paul Hogan?Platoon?
1985?25.71?38.65?Alan Alda, Jane Fonda and コマドリ Williams?Out of Africa?

?

The comments below have not been 穏健なd.

The 見解(をとる)s 表明するd in the contents above are those of our 使用者s and do not やむを得ず 反映する the 見解(をとる)s of MailOnline.

We are no longer 受託するing comments on this article.