The House of Lords could make 驚くべき/特命の/臨時の THIRD 企て,努力,提案 to 抑制(する) 圧力(をかける) freedom today?

  • The House of Lords will consider 開始 the Leveson 調査 for a second time
  • Lib Dem peer Lord McNally has (米)棚上げする/(英)提議するd an 改正 to the?Data 保護 法案
  • The change would 量 to?‘a 小型の-Leveson every three years’ it is (人命などを)奪う,主張するd?

The House of Lords will consider an 驚くべき/特命の/臨時の third 企て,努力,提案 to 抑制(する) 圧力(をかける) freedom today.

MPs 拒絶するd calls to 再開する the Leveson 調査 into 圧力(をかける) 基準s for a second time last week, 主要な 負かす/撃墜するing Street to 警告する peers to ‘尊敬(する)・点 the wishes of the elected house’.

No 10 said any new 調査 would be ‘backward-looking, disproportionate and 高くつく/犠牲の大きい’.

Peers in the House of Lords are being warned the should not go against the wishes of the 'elected house' over an amendment to the?Data Protection Bill

Peers in the House of Lords are 存在 警告するd the should not go against the wishes of the 'elected house' over an 改正 to the?Data 保護 法案

But peers will consider a fresh 改正 to the Data 保護 法案 this afternoon.

Lib Dem peer Lord McNally’s 改正 is seen by some as a way of 課すing a Leveson-style 調査 by the 支援する door.

It would 要求する a 裁判官-led review of 圧力(をかける) (民事の)告訴s 手続きs ? 言及/関連ing Sir Brian Leveson’s findings ? every three years. An 産業 source said it would 量 to ‘a 小型の-Leveson every three years’.

Lib Dem peer Lord McNally tabled an amendment to the Data Protection Bill to launch another Leveson style inquiry?

Lib Dem peer Lord McNally (米)棚上げする/(英)提議するd an 改正 to the Data 保護 法案 to 開始する,打ち上げる another Leveson style 調査?

労働 sources played 負かす/撃墜する suggestions they would 支援する the move, which will struggle to pass without their 投票(する)s.

The previous Lords 投票(する)s (機の)カム にもかかわらず a Tory manifesto 誓約(する) not to 再開する the Leveson 調査. Tory peer Lord Attlee, who 支援するd those 企て,努力,提案s, said it would be wrong to challenge the ありふれたs again.

?

The comments below have not been 穏健なd.

The 見解(をとる)s 表明するd in the contents above are those of our 使用者s and do not やむを得ず 反映する the 見解(をとる)s of MailOnline.

We are no longer 受託するing comments on this article.