最高裁判所 will decide whether Trump can end Obama's DACA program to stop 国外追放するing 'dreamers' - and should 支配する before 2020 選挙

  • 最高裁判所 司法(官)s 発表する they will hear 事例/患者 on whether Trump can 合法的に 廃止する DACA, with a 審理,公聴会 likely in the 落ちる?
  • That would 始める,決める 決定/判定勝ち(する) day up for June 2020, just before the party 条約s and thrusting the 問題/発行する into the heart of the 大統領の (選挙などの)運動をする
  • DACA 保護物,者s 700,000 違法な 移民,移住(する)s who arrived as children from 国外追放 and was introduced by Obama by (n)役員/(a)執行力のある order
  • Trump 廃止するd it すぐに after taking office but 連邦の 法廷,裁判所s 封鎖するd his move taking 影響 and now 最高裁判所 will 支配する on his 決定/判定勝ち(する)
  • 'Dreamers' who 利益 from DACA get two-year work 許すs which they must 新たにする and have no path to 永久の?住居 or 市民権

The U.S. 最高裁判所 on Friday agreed to decide whether 大統領 Donald Trump 行為/法令/行動するd 合法の when he moved to end a program that 保護物,者s from 国外追放 hundreds of thousands of 移民,移住(する)s who were brought to the country 不法に as children, a 重要な part of his 強行路線 移民/移住 政策s.

The nine 司法(官)s took up the Trump 行政's 控訴,上告s of three 地裁 判決,裁定s that 封鎖するd his 2017 move to 無効にする the Deferred 活動/戦闘 for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program 器具/実施するd in 2012 by his Democratic 前任者 Barack Obama.?

The program 現在/一般に 保護するs about 700,000 移民,移住(する)s often called 'Dreamers,' mostly Hispanic young adults, from 国外追放 and 供給するs them work 許すs, though not a path to 市民権.

The program has remained in 影響 にもかかわらず Trump's 成果/努力s to 無効にする it, part of his hard-line 移民/移住 政策s that have become a 目だつ feature of his 大統領/総裁などの地位 and his 2020 re-選挙運動.?

Trump has 支援するd 限界s on 合法的な and 違法な 移民/移住 and has sought construction of a 塀で囲む along the U.S.-Mexican 国境 since taking office in January 2017.

Another blockbuster: The Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice John Roberts (center) is now set to rule on whether Trump could end Obama's DACA program to shield illegals brought as children from deportation

Another blockbuster: The 最高裁判所, led by 長,指導者 司法(官) John Roberts (中心) is now 始める,決める to 支配する on whether Trump could end Obama's DACA program t o 保護物,者 違法なs brought as children from 国外追放

Election issue: The decision by the Supreme Court justices is likely in June 2020 - with just months to go until the 2020 election, thrusting the issue into the heart of the campaign

選挙 問題/発行する: The 決定/判定勝ち(する) by the 最高裁判所 司法(官)s is likely in June 2020 - with just months to go until the 2020 選挙, thrusting the 問題/発行する into the heart of the (選挙などの)運動をする

The 合法的な question before the 最高裁判所 was whether the 行政 適切に followed a 連邦の 法律 called the 行政の 手続き 行為/法令/行動する in Trump's 計画(する) to end DACA.

Three 連邦の 地方裁判所 裁判官s 問題/発行するd orders 停止(させる)ing Trump's move to end DACA in 訴訟s challenging the move とじ込み/提出するd by a group of 明言する/公表するs, people 保護するd by the program, 権利s groups and others. The Trump 行政 has argued that Obama 越えるd his 憲法の 力/強力にするs when he bypassed 議会 and created the program.

Signature move: Obama's DACA is a key part of his legacy; dismantling it was one of Trump's most high-profile pledges

署名 move: Obama's DACA is a 重要な part of his 遺産/遺物; 取り去る/解体するing it was one of Trump's most high-profile 誓約(する)s

Trump 発表するd his 決定/判定勝ち(する) to 無効にする DACA in September 2017, planning for the Dreamers' 保護s to begin 段階ing out in March 2018. But 法廷,裁判所s in California, New York and the 地区 of Columbia directed the 行政 to continue 過程ing 再開s of 存在するing DACA 使用/適用s while the litigation over the 合法性 of Trump's 活動/戦闘 was 解決するd.

Obama created DACA by (n)役員/(a)執行力のある 活動/戦闘 in 2012 as what he called 'a 一時的な stop-gap 手段' after the 失敗 in 議会 of bipartisan 法律制定 called the Dream 行為/法令/行動する that would have 供給するd a path to 市民権 to young 移民,移住(する)s brought by their parents 不法に into the country as children, いつかs as 幼児s.

When he created the DACA, Obama said that the people it 保護するd were raised and educated in the 部隊d 明言する/公表するs, grew up as Americans in their hearts and minds, and may known little about their countries of origin.?

Under DACA, those 適格の are 保護するd from 国外追放 and given work 許すs for two-year periods, after which they must re-適用する.

The Trump 行政 said Trump 所有するs the 当局 to end a program 器具/実施するd by a previous 大統領,/社長, 行為/法令/行動するd 合法の in 捜し出すing to 無効にする it and that 法廷,裁判所s should have no say in the 事柄.

Decision time: Trump now faces waiting almost a year to hear the fate of his DACA abolition

決定/判定勝ち(する) time: Trump now 直面するs waiting almost a year to hear the 運命/宿命 of his DACA 廃止

訴訟s challenging Trump's 活動/戦闘 were とじ込み/提出するd in さまざまな 法廷,裁判所s by a group of 明言する/公表するs 含むing California and New York, individual DACA 受取人s, the University of California, civil 権利s groups, labor unions and Microsoft Corp, which 表明するd 関心 its own 従業員s would be 影響する/感情d.

Since the 行政 開始する,打ち上げるd its 控訴,上告, a second 地域の 連邦の 控訴,上告s 法廷,裁判所 支配するd against Trump.?

The Richmond, Virginia-based 4th U.S. 回路・連盟 法廷,裁判所 of 控訴,上告s 支配するd on May 17 that Trump's rescission of DACA was unlawful.

The San Francisco-based 9th U.S. 回路・連盟 法廷,裁判所 of 控訴,上告s on Nov. 8 upheld 連邦の 裁判官 William Alsup's January 2018 判決,裁定 against Trump, 説 the 挑戦者s 供給するd 証拠 of '差別的な 動機づけ, 含むing the rescission order's disparate 衝撃 on Latinos and persons of Mexican 遺産.'

During the 最高裁判所's inaction, Trump and 議会 have made no 進歩 toward reaching a 取引,協定 to 保護(する)/緊急輸入制限 DACA 受取人s even as Democratic 大統領の 候補者s 含むing 前線-走者 Joe Biden 誓約(する) 活動/戦闘s to 保護する the Dreamers and 申し込む/申し出 them 市民権.

The 最高裁判所 in February 2018 拒絶するd an earlier Trump 行政 控訴,上告 in the California 事例/患者.

The comments below have not been 穏健なd.

The 見解(をとる)s 表明するd in the contents above are those of our 使用者s and do not やむを得ず 反映する the 見解(をとる)s of MailOnline.

We are no longer 受託するing comments on this article.