Ohio 共和国の/共和党の 衆議院 投票(する) 全員一致で to let students 供給する WRONG answers on science 実験(する) and homework for 宗教的な 推論する/理由s, 軍隊ing schools to grade on '実体 and relevance'

  • House 法案 164 - called the 'Student 宗教的な Liberties 行為/法令/行動する' - was passed in the Ohio House on Wednesday and was sponsored by Rep. Timothy Ginter?
  • It passed with a 投票(する) of 61-31 and will go to the 上院, which is also controlled by 共和国の/共和党のs
  • Assignments?would need to be graded on 'academic 基準s of 実体 and relevance' instead on actual answers?
  • It also gives students the ability to 手渡す out their own 'written 構成要素s or literature of a 宗教的な' to their peers?
  • House 民主党員s frowned on the 決定/判定勝ち(する), attacking it on Twitter?
  • In a 声明 to the DailyMail.com, the ACLU of Ohio みなすd the new 法律 'unnecessary'?

House Bill 164 - called the 'Student Religious Liberties Act' - was passed in the Ohio House on Wednesday and was sponsored by Rep. Timothy Ginter, an ordained minister

House 法案 164 - called the 'Student 宗教的な Liberties 行為/法令/行動する' - was passed in the Ohio House on Wednesday and was sponsored by Rep. Timothy Ginter, an 任命するd 大臣

The 共和国の/共和党の controlled 衆議院 in Ohio has 押し進めるd a 法律 through to the 明言する/公表する's 上院 妨げるing students for 存在 penalized if their science work is wrong because of their 宗教的な beliefs.?

House 法案 164 - called the 'Student 宗教的な Liberties 行為/法令/行動する' - was passed in the Ohio House on Wednesday and was sponsored by Rep. Timothy Ginter, an 任命するd 大臣.?

It passed with a 投票(する) of 61-31 and will go to the 上院, which is also controlled by 共和国の/共和党のs.

'No school 地区 board of education shall 禁じる a student from engaging in 宗教的な 表現 in the 完成 of homework, artwork, or other written or oral assignments,' the 法律 明言する/公表するs.

'Assignment grades and 得点する/非難する/20s shall be calculated using ordinary academic 基準s of 実体 and relevance, 含むing any 合法的 pedagogical 関心s, and shall not penalize or reward a student based on the 宗教的な content of a student's work.'?

It passed with a vote of 61-31 and will go to the Senate, which is also controlled by Republicans

It passed with a 投票(する) of 61-31 and will go to the 上院, which is also controlled by 共和国の/共和党のs

The 法律 would also 許す for 地区s to 供給する a moment of silence for 祈り, reflection or meditation 'upon a moral, philosophical, or 愛国的な 主題.'?

'No pupil shall be 要求するd to 参加する in such activities if they are contrary to the 宗教的な 有罪の判決s of the pupil or the pupil's parents or 後見人s,' the 法律 明言する/公表するs.

It also gives students the ability to 手渡す out their own 'written 構成要素s or literature of a 宗教的な' to their peers.?

Students would be 許すd to wear '象徴的な 着せる/賦与するing or 表現 of a 宗教的な viewpoint, 供給するd that the activity is not obscene, vulgar, offensively lewd, or indecent.'?

Assignments would need to be graded on 'academic standards of substance and relevance' instead on actual answers

Assignments would need to be graded on 'academic 基準s of 実体 and relevance' instead on actual answers

Under the 法律, 宗教的な 表現 can take place 'before, during and after' school hours in the same manner as extra curricular activities.?

House 民主党員s frowned on the 決定/判定勝ち(する), attacking it on Twitter.?

'Today, @OhioHouseGOP passed a 法案 妨げるing teachers from penalizing students’ school work 含む/封じ込めるing 宗教的な beliefs, even when it 否定するs science,' they said in a Wednesday?tweet.

'This is just the 最新の attack on truth and science fro m Ohio GOP 国会議員s. This has to stop.'

In a 声明 to the DailyMail.com, the ACLU of Ohio みなすd the new 法律 'unnecessary.'?

'保護するing the 宗教的な 権利s of students is a laudable goal. But, their 権利s are already fully 保護するd by the First 改正 & Ohio 憲法,' explained Gary Daniels, 長,指導者 Lobbyist for the ACLU of Ohio.

'This 法律制定 is not only unnecessary, it also 捜し出すs to elevate 宗教的な speech in ways we believe will 必然的に lead to much 混乱 加える 憲法の 違反s in Ohio’s public schools.'?

House Democrats frowned on the decision, attacking it on Twitter

House 民主党員s frowned on the 決定/判定勝ち(する), attacking it on Twitter

The comments below have not been 穏健なd.

The 見解(をとる)s 表明するd in the contents above are those of our 使用者s and do not やむを得ず 反映する the 見解(をとる)s of MailOnline.

We are no longer 受託するing comments on this article.