Prince Harry loses Ipso （民事の）告訴 over Mail on Sunday story that criticised his 野性生物 photographs that didn’t 明らかにする／漏らす the fact an elephant was 'drugged and tethered'

• e-mail

Prince Harry has lost an Ipso （民事の）告訴 over a Mail on Sunday story that 明らかにする／漏らすd he had photos taken with a 'drugged and tethered' elephant.?

The Duke of Sussex complained to the 独立した・無所属 圧力（をかける） 基準s Organisation 説 the paper had 違反d 条項 1 of its Editors' Code of Practice, '正確', regarding the article published on April 28 last year.?

Harry had 地位，任命するd 野性生物 pictures on the Sussex 王室の Instagram page for Earth Day - images used by The Mail on Sunday for a story with the headline:?'Drugged and tethered… what Harry didn't tell you about those awe-奮起させるing 野性生物 photos'.

It was 報告（する）／憶測d that the images 'don't やめる tell the 十分な story' as they did not show the rope around the 支援する 脚s of one of the pictured elephants, 追加するing that the 原告，告訴人 '顕著に 避けるd explaining the circumstances in which the images were taken'.

The article 報告（する）／憶測d that a spokesperson for the 原告，告訴人 had 拒絶する／低下するd to discuss the photos, though 'sources 否定するd the rope was deliberately edited out of the elephant picture, （人命などを）奪う，主張するing instead that ''it was 予定 to Instagram's 判型''.'

All three of the animals 伴う／関わるd - a rhino, elephant and lion - had been tranquilised and the elephant had also been tethered as they were 存在 relocated as part of 自然保護 事業／計画（する）s, it was 報告（する）／憶測d.

This is the edited photograph of the elephant taken in Malawi that appeared to 示す Earth Day on Prince Harry's 公式の／役人 Instagram page

The same photograph from another angle, which shows that the elephant had been tethered?

Harry said the article was 不確かの because it 暗示するd he had deliberately misled the public through cropping.?Ipso 支配するd that the code had not been 違反d, finding that there had been?'no 失敗 to take care not to publish 不確かの （警察などへの）密告，告訴（状）'.??

The duke had argued that the 十分な uncropped photograph was published on the 王室の Family website in 2016 and has been 公然と 利用できる ever since, 追加するing that it was also pub lished on the 自然保護 group website - which he 供給するd a link to - with a description and ビデオ of the tranquilising and tethering.?

Harry （人命などを）奪う，主張するd the article gave the 誤って導くing impression that he had cropped out the tether to create the 誤った impression that he was a 'superior 野性生物 photographer', Ipso's 判決，裁定 明言する／公表するs.?

He said that the image was cropped 予定 to the formatting 必要物／必要条件s of the social マスコミ 場所／位置, explaining that his Instagram was 支配する to bespoke settings such that the photographs he 地位，任命するs have a 国境 around them and the picture of the elephant had to be cropped to fit this template -with the only 代案／選択肢 editing out the elephant handler.?

The 圧力（をかける） regulator published their findings online, 明言する／公表するing: 'The 委員会 considered that it was not （疑いを）晴らす from the images themselves that the animals had been tranquilised and tethered.?

'The photograph of the elephant had been cropped to edit out the animal's tethered 脚; the 出版（物） had 論証するd that the photograph could have been edited 異なって and the 原告，告訴人 受託するd that the album could have been uploaded in a different 判型 which would have made editing the photograph unnecessary.?

'The …を伴ってing caption did not make the position （疑いを）晴らす or that the images had 以前 been published, unedited, in 2016.?

'The position was not made （疑いを）晴らす 簡単に as a result of the 傾向 of the link to the website.?

'In these circumstances, the Co mmittee did not consider that it was 意味ありげに 誤って導くing to 報告（する）／憶測 that the photographs 地位，任命するd on the 原告，告訴人's Instagram account did not やめる tell the 十分な story and that the 原告，告訴人 had not explained the circumstances in which the photographs had been taken.?

'There was no 違反 of 条項 1.'?

Harry, pictured with Meghan, said the article was 不確かの because it 暗示するd he had deliberately misled the public through cropping

The 判決，裁定 continues:?'Where the article 焦点（を合わせる）d on the 原告，告訴人's 公然と 利用できる Instagram 地位，任命するs and the （警察などへの）密告，告訴（状） they 陳列する，発揮するd, the 委員会 did not consider that it was necessary for the newspaper to 接触する the 原告，告訴人 for comment on the published （人命などを）奪う，主張するs.???

Harry's wife, the Duchess of Sussex, is 告訴するing The Mail on Sunday after it published a 私的な letter to her father, Thomas Markle, 告発する／非難するing the paper of?misusing her 私的な （警察などへの）密告，告訴（状）, 違反ing copyright and selective editing.?

The paper …に反対するs the （人命などを）奪う，主張するs, pointing out the '抱擁する and 合法的' public 利益／興味 in publishing the 公式文書，認める.?

After 確認するing Meghan's 合法的な 事例／患者, Harry 明らかにする／漏らすd he would be taking 合法的な 活動／戦闘 against owners of the 消滅した／死んだ News of the World, the Sun, and the Daily Mirror, over 主張s of phone-切り開く／タクシー／不正アクセスing.??