Mankad family SLAM calls to stop 指名するing one of cricket’s most 議論の的になる 行為／法令／行動するs after their 親族 as grandson says: ‘I’d love to see it stay and keep his memories alive’

• e-mail

The family of Vinoo Mankad has criticised calls for 改名するing the 議論の的になる method of 解雇／（訴訟の）却下, 主張するing they were proud to be associated with it.

The practice of running out the 乱打する at the 非，不，無-striker's end has been part of cricket's vocabulary since Mankad first （軍隊を）展開する，配備するd it during India's 小旅行する of Australia in 1947.?

Mankad ran out Australian 乱打する 法案 Brown by 除去するing the 保釈（金）s at the 非，不，無-striker's end after Brown had stepped 井戸／弁護士席 out of his crease during a 小旅行する match against an Australian XI.

厳しい Mankad 主張するd he doesn't want the 称する，呼ぶ／期間／用語 Mankad to disappear from cricket?

Mankad, a left-arm 正統派の spin, then repeated the trick in the second 実験（する） in Sydney.

The 解雇／（訴訟の）却下 has been a source of 論争 ever since with its detractors considering it unsportsmanlike, にもかかわらず it 存在 perfectly 合法的な under?the Marylebone Cricket Club 法律s of Cricket.

And Australian Cricketers 協会 CEO Todd Greenberg and Cricket New South むちの跡s CEO 物陰／風下 Germon have led calls to stop using Mankad's 指名する to 言及する to the practice of running out a 乱打する 支援 up.

'I don’t think it’s a 審議. I think I’s very 黒人／ボイコット and white. It shouldn’t be the word Mankad,' Greenberg said on SEN on Friday.

Vinoo Mankad (権利) first （軍隊を）展開する，配備するd the method of 解雇／（訴訟の）却下 during India's 小旅行する of Australia in 1947, running out 法案 Brown in a 小旅行する match and then in the second 実験（する） in Sydney

'I agree, the players have a 役割 in eradicating that 称する，呼ぶ／期間／用語. It’s a run out at the 非，不，無-striker’s end. [...] We have a 抱擁する 適切な時期 and 責任／義務 as the エリート players to make sure we change that.

'Language is important. トン is important. And an understanding that when you break 支配するs there are consequences.'

But it appears Mankad's family are perfectly happy with their ancestor's 指名する 存在 associated with it instead.?

'I’m always delighted to see my grandfather 存在 remembered,'?厳しい Mankad, the grandson of Vinoo Mankad, India's No1-階級d tennis player throughout the 2000s, told the 先触れ（する） Sun.

Australian Crickters' 協会 CEO Todd Greenberg (left) has called for players to eradicate the word Mankad from cricket out of 尊敬（する）・点 for the Mankad family

'I feel it to be a 広大な／多数の／重要な honour for our 指名する to be associated with a cricketing 称する，呼ぶ／期間／用語.?

'I’d love to see the “Mankad” or “Mankading” stay and keep alive his memories and 遺産／遺物 as a 広大な／多数の／重要な competitor and sportsman 深く，強烈に 尊敬（する）・点d and admired by everyone I’ve met and those who knew him and experienced life with him!'

On Tuesday, the 審議 over the legitimacy of the 解雇／（訴訟の）却下 was reignited when Adam Zampa 試みる／企てるd to run out Tom Rogers in the Melbourne derby in the Big Bash.

A ビデオ review led to Rogers 存在 given not out because Zampa's bowling arm had gone past its highest point before the 脚-spinner reached 支援する to knock the 保釈（金）s off.

Adam Zampa (権利) 試みる／企てるd to mankad Tom Rogers in the BBL on Tuesday at the MCG

The Melbourne 星／主役にするs captain 主張するd he was 井戸／弁護士席 'within his 権利s' to run-out Rogers??

The Melbourne 星／主役にするs captain 主張するd he was '井戸／弁護士席 within his 権利s' to mankad Rogers, but was criticised by his own coach, David Hussey, who slammed the 試みる／企てる as 'not the 権利 way to play cricket'.

In October last year, the International Cricket 会議 changed its 支配するs over Mankading to no longer 分類する it as '不公平な Play' but 簡単に another method of 'Run Out'.?

The 議論の的になる 解雇／（訴訟の）却下 has always been considered a 合法的な and fair way of 解任するing a 乱打する under the?Marylebone Cricket Club 法律s of Cricket.

On-field umpire Gerard Abood explained to Zampa TV umpire Shawn Craig gave Rogers not out after みなすing the 星／主役にするs 船長／主将 had 完全にするd his 活動／戦闘 without letting go of the ball.

法律 41.16.1 of the MCC code 明言する／公表するs that: 'If the 非，不，無-striker is out of his/her ground at any time from the moment the ball comes into play until the instant when the bowler would 普通は have been 推定する／予想するd to 解放（する） the ball, the 非，不，無-striker is liable to be Run out.?

'In these circumstances, the 非，不，無-striker will be out Run out if he/she is out of his/her ground when his/her wicket is put 負かす／撃墜する by the bowler throwing the ball at the stumps or by the bowler’s 手渡す 持つ／拘留するing the ball, whether or not the ball is subsequently 配達するd.'