John 石／投石するs' howlers against Holland showed why Pep Guardiola left England man out for Man City's run-in

• e-mail

Gareth Southgate summed it up perfectly after England’s extra-time 敗北・負かす by Holland.

‘We want bravery but not stupidity,’ the Three Lions boss said about passing it out from the 支援する. ‘We have to find that balance.’ John 石／投石するs didn’t have that on Thursday night.

When Holland took a 2-1 lead, it was the Manchester City centre-支援する who was caught dawdling on the ball. When they took a 3-1 lead, it was 石／投石するs’s hospital pass that put Ross Barkley under unnecessary 圧力. Both were unforced errors and both were inexcusable. It was bad 決定／判定勝ち（する）-making from 石／投石するs.

Gareth Southgate (L) consoles John 石／投石するs に引き続いて England's 敗北・負かす to Holland on Thursday

石／投石するs was caught in 所有／入手 by Memphis Depay and his 発射 led to an own goal

No one is 支持するing booting the ball into 列／漕ぐ／騒動 Z whenever an England defender has it. Southgate has the 権利 idea with the way he wants his team to play.

But what his defenders have to do is use their 長，率いるs.

When 石／投石するs 許すd himself to be stripped of 所有／入手 by Memphis Depay in 前線 of his own box, he took four touches in total.

Really, he should have taken one to 支配（する）／統制する the ball, then a second to pass it 支援する to the goalke eper. That’s what most central defenders would have done. That’s what Virgil 先頭 Dijk would have done. He would have smelled the danger and played it 安全な. 石／投石するs didn’t.

He took a 危険 and England 行方不明になるd out on their chance of making their first major final since 1966.

There is a 推論する／理由 why 石／投石するs was used いっそう少なく and いっそう少なく by Pep Guardiola for City’s 肩書を与える run-in. We saw it against Holland.

Chris Sutton’s ideal 支援する four: Walker, Gomez, Maguire, Rose.

There is a 推論する／理由 why 石／投石するs was used いっそう少なく and いっそう少なく by Pep Guardiola for the 肩書を与える run-in