テレビ視聴者s of The 1% Club were left baffled by a question that seemed to have more than one answer on Saturday.
The show 実験（する）s 100 members of the public's 知能, ありふれた sense and logic with questions that 上がる in order of difficulty によれば what 割合 of the wider public can answer them - 90 per cent, 80 per cent, 負かす／撃墜する to one per cent.
This week, what appeared at first to be a straightforward question from the 30 per cent section, got some fans of the show worked up.
It read: 'Amrit and his grandad 株 the same birthday. Their birthday balloons arrive muddled up. Amrit's grandad is three times older than him. How old is Amrit?'
Four gold balloons were on 陳列する，発揮する beneath the question 形態／調整d in the numbers six, eight, seven and two.
テレビ視聴者s of The 1% Club were left baffled by a question that seemed to have more than one answer on Saturday (show host 物陰／風下 Mack pictured)
This week, what appeared at first to be a straightforward question from the 30 per cent section, got some fans of the show worked up
It was 心配するd the answer would be that Amrit is 26 years old, making his grandfather 78.
However, one person commented on the show's 公式の／役人 Instagram page, （人命などを）奪う，主張するing: 'My other half is 毅然とした that his answer of 29 is also 権利.'
They 追加するd: 'There's no string on those balloons, therefore you could turn the 6 upside 負かす／撃墜する. 3x29=87 What do you reckon? Was he still in, or was he out of the game?'
テレビ視聴者s also took to Twitter to 申し込む／申し出 their thoughts, with one person 令状ing: 'Could've been 2 answers which is 半端物...flip the 6 一連の会議、交渉／完成する to a 9 and could've been 29 and 87.'
Someone else 株d: 'It could also be 29 ie one third of 87? If I had put that in the studio I would 推定する／予想する to 控訴，上告!!! Previous questions have used balloons to switch 6 and 9s!!!'
While another person 地位，任命するd: 'Hmm they should've drawn strings on the 底（に届く）s of the balloons if they 手配中の，お尋ね者 to 避ける people turning the 6 upside 負かす／撃墜する for 29 and 87.'?
一方／合間 The 1% Club テレビ視聴者s also criticised the show recently for its '平易な' final question during a February episode.?
The show 実験（する）s 100 members of the public's 知能, ありふれた sense and logic with questions that 上がる in order of difficulty によれば what 割合 of the wider public can answer them - 90 per cent, 80 per cent, 負かす／撃墜する to one per cent.
It was 心配するd the answer would be that Amrit is 26 years old, making his grandfather 78 bu some テレビ視聴者s 示唆するd an 代案／選択肢 answer
The 1% question on the most 最近の episode was 明らかに not as difficult as the show thought as many テレビ視聴者s thought it was too simple.
The question was: 'Using only two letters to fill in the blank, what is the word below? P _ _ _ E _ _ I _ N'.? The answer was '所有／入手'.?
While this is a question that 明らかに 99% of the public can't answer, plenty of X 使用者s got it 権利.
One 使用者 wrote: 'Don’t usually get the last question but I saw that one 即時に. 平易な peasy.'?
A nother agreed, 追加するing: 'That was easier than the few before it.'
A third wrote: 'Got it! Blimey I 現実に answered the 1% question!'
Another 使用者 jokingly wrote: 'Getting 堅い this show,' to which The 1% Cub's Twitter account replied: 'We're 堅い cookies what can we say'.?
The show, which has 空気／公表するd three series so far, is hosted by comedian 物陰／風下 Mack.
The question was: 'Using only two letters to fill in the blank, what is the word below? P _ _ _ E _ _ I _ N'. The answer was '所有／入手'
While this is a questin that 明らかに 99% of the public can't answer, plenty of X 使用者s got it 権利
It comes after 物陰／風下 以前 spoke out about 取り消す culture, 説?no joke on any 支配する should be off 限界s - as long as it is funny enough.
The Not Going Out 星／主役にする said the golden 支配する should be that the joke must be more funny than shocking.
But he said although that means in 原則 anything is fair game, in practice some topics are so 極度の慎重さを要する that no comedian will come up with a funny enough joke.
Mack - who still 令状s long-running BBC sitcom Not Going Out, but now rarely does stand-up - also said too often now jokes have become 裁判官d without looking at the 意向 behind them.
He said: 'In 原則, there isn't anything that you can't do a joke about, nothing.
'But for me, the joke has to be funnier than it is shocking.
'So the more shocking the 支配する 事柄 the better the joke has to be.
'And there are some 支配する 事柄s that are so shocking no one is good enough to think of a joke that is funnier than it is shocking.
It comes after 物陰／風下 以前 spoke out about 取り消す culture, 説 no joke on any 支配する should be off 限界s - as long as it is funny enough
'So in 原則 you can do a joke about anything, but in practice you can't because no one's that good.'
He 追加するd: 'You could go 'what about this horrific event, would you be able to do a joke?' In 原則, yes.
'But I could spend two years trying to 令状 a 魔法 joke about it that was more funny than shocking, and I'd never 達成する it.
'And that's the problem. いつかs comedians are doing jokes that just aren't funny enough, because they have to be even funnier when it's that shocking.'
