30 SECOND GUIDE: 財政上の 処理／取引 U-turns

By DAILY MAIL REPORTERS

Updated: 13:01 BST, 9 August 2012

The Daily Mail City team explains the 法律s that 規制する 財政上の 処理／取引s with countries 支配する to 許可／制裁s.

No U-turn: In the 事例／患者 US （疑いを）晴らすing banks do not have enough （警察などへの）密告，告訴（状） from the banks 伴う／関わるd

What’s the 連合 done now?

We're not talking about the 政府 flip flopping on pasty 税金 or caravan 税金. It is the 称する，呼ぶ／期間／用語 given to 述べる 財政上の 処理／取引s banks are 許すd to 過程 in countries that are 支配する to 許可／制裁s.

So what?

基準 借り切る／憲章d has been （刑事）被告 by a US regulator of 計画／陰謀ing with Iran between 2001 and 2010 to hide £160billion in secret 処理／取引s, 違反ing US 許可／制裁s.

The New York 明言する／公表する Department of 財政上の Services （人命などを）奪う，主張するs the bank did not stick to 成し遂げるing these 合法的な U-turn 処理／取引s.?

How does a U-turn work?

Money is moved for Iranian （弁護士の）依頼人s between 非，不，無-Iranian foreign banks and （疑いを）晴らすd through the US. Crucially, the 処理／取引 should neither start nor end in Iran.

In 基準 借り切る／憲章d’s 事例／患者 these US dollar 処理／取引s were 成し遂げるd through its New York office.

How is it （刑事）被告 of doing this?

To 設立する whether 処理／取引s are permitted under the U-turn 法律s, US （疑いを）晴らすing banks use the wire 移転 messages they get from banks 伴う／関わるd.

If banks do not have enough （警察などへの）密告，告訴（状） they are supposed to 凍結する the 資産s. 基準 is （刑事）被告 of stripping these wire messages of （警察などへの）密告，告訴（状） identifying their Iranian （弁護士の）依頼人s, 取って代わるing it with 誤った 入ること／参加（者）s.