Footy guru Phil Gould 明らかにする／漏らすs the most ridiculous 支配する in the NRL: 'Our game is so stupid'
- NRL changed the 支配するs in regards to short kick offs??
- Now there are calls to 禁止（する） the kick off to minimise concussions?
- Gould has gone 核の over the 支配する changes?
NRL guru Phil Gould has gone 核の over 提案するd 支配する changes to the kick off and called for the 最高の，を越す 厚かましさ／高級将校連 to listen to coaches and players instead of doctors and lawyers.
Gould has been left 激怒（する）ing over calls to 無法者 the kick return in a 企て，努力，提案 to 減ずる concussions in the game.
That conversation reached fever pitch on Anzac Day when St George Illawarra centre Moses Suli was knocked out when his 長，率いる collected the 肘 and 長，率いる of Roosters 支え（る） Jared Waerea-Hargreaves.
Former rugby league player and?尊敬（する）・点d doctor Nathan Gibbs has said the easiest way to 妨げる these 衝突／不一致 is to 禁止（する） the kick return while a host of 新聞記者／雑誌記者s have also agreed the idea has 長所.
Gould has questioned why players and coaches aren't 存在 協議するd and why there are so many new 支配するs popping up in the NRL
However former players have blown up at the suggestion, with former Bulldogs and Dragons 船長／主将 James Graham 説: 'If you want the game to be [完全に] 安全な, you're playing the wrong game,' on NRL360.
Gould is now begging the NRL to start listening to the coaches and playe rs and stop ripping at the fabric of the game through constant 支配する changes.?
'There's no 代案／選択肢, leave the game alone,' he said on Nine's 100% Footy.
'We are 涙／ほころびing it apart. It is really 失望させるing watching our game be torn apart by everybody 妨げる／法廷，弁護士業 the coaches and the players, it just 運動s me mad. Doctors, lawyers and fans on social マスコミ, that's all they listen to. They don't listen to players.'
He pointed to the 最近の 支配する change where teams no longer give away a 刑罰，罰則 for 試みる／企てるing a short 減少（する） out and failing as how the game has gone mad.
?'Our game is so stupid,' he said.
'You can lose the ball over the line 得点する／非難する／２０ing a try and you get penalised 20 metres and seven 取り組むs ... why? I don't know, because it's stupid.
'But I can just take a line 減少（する） out and if it goes out on the 十分な or doesn't go 10 metres, no consequence, nothing at all. What sort of stupid game is this? Who sits and makes up these 支配するs?
?'The Api Koroisau try. What the hell was that? We are so stupid with our 支配するs ... our game is stupid.'
Raiders fans were 失望させるd by the new short kick off 支配するs in their 激しい loss to Cronulla
Gould 地位，任命するd his rant to social マスコミ 壇・綱領・公約 X, where his 信奉者s agreed with his take and 申し込む／申し出d other examples 同様に.
'Same thing happened with [New Zealand 軍人] Roger's [Tuivasa-Sheck] try on the 週末,'?one 信奉者 地位，任命するd.
'Only called a knock on because it was slowed 負かす／撃墜する to the point it looks like a knock on but if you see it 正規の／正選手 速度(を上げる） it's as normal as any other 選ぶ up.'?
'Good on you Phil for calling out the stupidity,' 退役軍人 新聞記者／雑誌記者 Ray Gatt 地位，任命するd.
'The NRL has been a reactive organisation for too long. 反応する to this to that to everything! The game is getting unrecognisable.'
Another fan said the 脚 解除する 刑罰，罰則 was another reactive move from the NRL.
'Throw in that new 脚 解除する 刑罰，罰則 同様に 本人自身で. I understand penalising it if it becomes dangerous but just 解除するing the 脚 isn't 価値（がある） getting penalised. ありふれた sense is 行方不明の at the moment.'?
